Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Merrick L. Furst

dblp:85/2593 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
18ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 11 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
9 papers
Computational complexity · 57% Algorithms and data structures · 13% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 9%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 57% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 43%
Network and information security
3 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.011994
Weakly learning DNF and characterizing statistical query learning using Fourier analysis · STOC 1994
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical query learning
0.011994
Weakly learning DNF and characterizing statistical query learning using Fourier analysis · STOC 1994
Computational complexity
circuit complexity
0.021991
The Expressive Power of Voting Polynomials · STOC 1991
Parity, Circuits, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy · FOCS 1981
Computational complexity
proof complexity
0.011989
Succinct Certificates for Almost All Subset Sum Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1989
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
subset sum
0.011989
Succinct Certificates for Almost All Subset Sum Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1989
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph embedding
0.011988
Finding a maximum-genus graph imbedding · J. ACM 1988
Coding theory › sequences
sequence generators
0.011987
Computing Short Generator Sequences · Inf. Comput. 1987
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation › computational algebra
algebraic algorithms
0.021983
On the Diameter of Permutation Groups · STOC 1983
Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Permutation Groups · FOCS 1980
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
group theory
0.021983
On the Diameter of Permutation Groups · STOC 1983
Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Permutation Groups · FOCS 1980
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation
permutation group algorithms
0.021983
On the Diameter of Permutation Groups · STOC 1983
Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Permutation Groups · FOCS 1980
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
pseudorandom generators
0.011985
Pseudorandom Number Generation and Space Complexity · Inf. Control. 1985
Computational complexity
pseudorandomness
0.011985
Pseudorandom Number Generation and Space Complexity · Inf. Control. 1985
Computational complexity
space complexity
0.011985
Pseudorandom Number Generation and Space Complexity · Inf. Control. 1985
Computational complexity
communication complexity
0.011983
Multi-Party Protocols · STOC 1983
Computational complexity › communication complexity
multiparty communication complexity
0.011983
Multi-Party Protocols · STOC 1983
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › group theory
permutation groups
0.011983
On the Diameter of Permutation Groups · STOC 1983
Computational complexity
boolean function complexity
0.011981
Parity, Circuits, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy · FOCS 1981
Computational complexity › circuit complexity › constant-depth circuits
constant-depth circuit lower bounds
0.011981
Parity, Circuits, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy · FOCS 1981
Computational complexity › boolean function complexity
parity function
0.011981
Parity, Circuits, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy · FOCS 1981
Computational complexity › complexity classes
polynomial hierarchy
0.011981
Parity, Circuits, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy · FOCS 1981
Computational complexity
relativization
0.011981
Parity, Circuits, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy · FOCS 1981
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation › computational algebra
computational group theory
0.011980
Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Permutation Groups · FOCS 1980
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph isomorphism
0.011980
Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Permutation Groups · FOCS 1980
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
computational number theory
0.011987
Computing Short Generator Sequences · Inf. Comput. 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

planning graph analysis · 0.0statistical queries · 0.0fourier analysis · 0.0lower bound techniques · 0.0lattice reduction · 0.0computational number theory · 0.0proof system · 0.0topological methods · 0.0linear matroid parity · 0.0reduction · 0.0polynomial-time algorithm · 0.0lower bound proof · 0.0generator representation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 On the Use of Computational Models of Influence for Managing Interactive Virtual Experiences
David L. Roberts 0001, Charles L. Isbell Jr., Mark O. Riedl, Ian Bogost, Merrick L. Furst
ICIDS5
2007 ThreadsTM: how to restructure a computer science curriculum for a flat world
abstract
In his book The World is Flat, Thomas Friedman convincingly explains the challenges of a global marketplace [4]. One implication is that software development can be out-sourced, as can any narrow, skills-based occupation; however, as Friedman also points out, leadership, innovation, and insight are always in demand. We have recently created and are implementing threadstm, a new structuring principle for computing curricula. Threads provides one clear path for scientists seeking to reinvent and re-invigorate science degree programs. Threads form a cohesive, coordinated set of contexts for understanding computing. The union of all threads covers the breadth computer science. The union of any two threads is sufficient to cover a science degree. In this paper, we describe Threads, our process, the impact so far, and some of our future plans. We close with recommendations for other schools, especially schools with smaller programs.
Merrick L. Furst, Charles L. Isbell Jr., Mark Guzdial
SIGCSE1
1997 Fast Planning Through Planning Graph Analysis
Avrim Blum, Merrick L. Furst
Artif. Intell.2
1995 Fast Planning Through Planning Graph Analysis
Avrim Blum, Merrick L. Furst
IJCAI2
1994 Weakly learning DNF and characterizing statistical query learning using Fourier analysis
abstract
We present new results, both positive and negative, on the well-studied problem of learning disjunctive normal form (DNF) expressions.We first prove that an algorithm due to Kushilevitz and Mansour ysis of a finite class of boolean functions 011 the hypercube.1
Avrim Blum, Merrick L. Furst, Jeffrey C. Jackson, Michael Kearns, Yishay Mansour, Steven Rudich
STOC2
1993 Cryptographic Primitives Based on Hard Learning Problems
Avrim Blum, Merrick L. Furst, Michael Kearns, Richard J. Lipton
CRYPTO2
1992 Exploiting correlations among competing models with application to large vocabulary speech recognition
abstract
In a typical speech recognition system, computing the match between an incoming acoustic string and many competing models is computationally expensive. Once the highest ranking models are identified, all other match scores are discarded. The authors propose to make use of all computed scores by means of statistical inference. They view the match between an incoming acoustic string s and a model M/sub i/ as a random variable Y/sub i/. The class-conditioning distributions of (Y/sub 1/,. . .Y/sub N/) can be studied offline by sampling, and then used in a variety of ways. For example, the means of these distributions give rise to a natural measure of distance between models. One of the most useful applications of these distributions is as a basis for a new Bayesian classifier. The latter can be used to significantly reduce search effort in large vocabularies, and to quickly obtain a short list of candidate words. An example hidden Markov model (HMM)-based system shows promising results.>
Ronald Rosenfeld, Xuedong Huang 0001, Merrick L. Furst
ICASSP3
1991 The Expressive Power of Voting Polynomials
abstract
We consider the problem of approximating a Boolean function f : f0; 1g n ! f0; 1g by the sign of an integer polynomial p of degree k. For us, a polynomial p(x) predicts the value of f(x) if, whenever p(x) 0, f(x) = 1, and whenever p(x) ! 0, f(x) = 0. A low-degree polynomial p is a good approximator for f if it predicts f at almost all points. Given a positive integer k, and a Boolean function f , we ask, "how good is the best degree k approximation to f?" We introduce a new lower bound technique which applies to any Boolean function. We show that the lower bound technique yields tight bounds in the case f is parity. Minsky and Papert [10] proved that a perceptron can not compute parity; our bounds indicate exactly how well Yale University, Dept. of Computer Science, P.O. Box 208285, New Haven CT 06520-8285. y Email: [email protected]. z Email: [email protected]. Supported in part by NSF grants CCR-8808949 and CCR-8958528. x Carnegie-Mellon University, Schoo...
James Aspnes, Richard Beigel, Merrick L. Furst, Steven Rudich
STOC3
1989 Succinct Certificates for Almost All Subset Sum Problems
abstract
Given n natural numbers $a_1 , \cdots ,a_n $ and a target integer b, the SubsetSum problem is to determine whether some subset of the $a_i $; sums to b. That is, to recognize members of the following set: \[ {\text{SubsetSum}} = \left\{ \left\langle {a_1 , \cdots ,a_n ;b} \right\rangle |a_i \in {\bf N} b \in {\bf Z},{\text{ and }}\exists x \in \{ 0,1\} ^n {\text{ such that }} a \cdot x = b \right\} . \] For a given vector $a = (a_1 , \cdots ,a_n )$ and integer b, if a subset of the $a_i $ sums to b, then listing which subset provides a short proof that $\langle {a;b} \rangle \in {\text{SubsetSum}}$. However, in general there are no short (polynomial-length) proofs of nonmembership unless NP equals coNP. The main result in this paper provides a proof system that contains polynomial-length nonmembership proofs for a vast majority of the problem instances that do not belong to SubsetSum.
Merrick L. Furst, Ravi Kannan
SIAM J. Comput.1
1988 Finding a maximum-genus graph imbedding
abstract
The computational complexity of constructing the imbeddings of a given graph into surfaces of different genus is not well understood. In this paper, topological methods and a reduction to linear matroid parity are used to develop a polynomial-time algorithm to find a maximum-genus cellular imbedding. This seems to be the first imbedding algorithm for which the running time is not exponential in the genus of the imbedding surface.
Merrick L. Furst, Jonathan L. Gross, Lyle A. McGeoch
J. ACM1
1987 Computing Short Generator Sequences
James R. Driscoll, Merrick L. Furst
Inf. Comput.2
1985 Pseudorandom Number Generation and Space Complexity
Merrick L. Furst, Richard J. Lipton, Larry J. Stockmeyer
Inf. Control.1
1984 Parity, Circuits, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy
Merrick L. Furst, James B. Saxe, Michael Sipser
Math. Syst. Theory1
1983 Pseudorandom Number Generation and Space Complexity
Merrick L. Furst, Richard J. Lipton, Larry J. Stockmeyer
FCT1
1983 Multi-Party Protocols
abstract
Many different types of inter-process communication have been examined from a complexity point of view [SP, Y]. We study a new model, in which a collection of processes
Ashok K. Chandra, Merrick L. Furst, Richard J. Lipton
STOC2
1983 On the Diameter of Permutation Groups
abstract
We show that any group represented by generators that are cycles of bounded degree has O(n2) diameter, i.e., that the longest product of generators required to reach any permutation in the group is O(n2). We also show how such “short” products can be found in polynomial time. The techniques presented are applicable to generalizations of many permutation-group puzzles such as Alexander's Star and the Hungarian Rings.
James R. Driscoll, Merrick L. Furst
STOC2
1981 Parity, Circuits, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy
abstract
A super-polynomial lower bound is given for the size of circuits of fixed depth computing the parity function. Introducing the notion of polynomial-size, constant-depth reduction, similar results are shown for the majority, multiplication, and transitive closure functions. Connections are given to the theory of programmable logic arrays and to the relativization of the polynomial-time hierarchy.
Merrick L. Furst, James B. Saxe, Michael Sipser
FOCS1
1980 Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Permutation Groups
abstract
A permutation group on n letters may always be represented by a small set of generators, even though its size may be exponential in n. We show that it is practical to use such a representation since many problems such as membership testing, equality testing, and inclusion testing are decidable in polynomial time. In addition, we demonstrate that the normal closure of a subgroup can be computed in polynomial time, and that this proceaure can be used to test a group for solvability. We also describe an approach to computing the intersection of two groups. The procedures and techniques have wide applicability and have recently been used to improve many graph isomorphism algorithms.
Merrick L. Furst, John E. Hopcroft, Eugene M. Luks
FOCS1