EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sigrid Knust
dblp:85/3138
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 7 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scheduling sports tournaments with two court types
Sigrid Knust, Melissa Koch, Xuan Thanh Le |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 1 |
| 2024 | Structural insights about avoiding transfers in the patient-to-room assignment problem
Tabea Brandt, Christina Büsing, Sigrid Knust |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 3 |
| 2022 | One Transfer per Patient Suffices: Structural Insights About Patient-to-Room Assignment
Tabea Brandt, Christina Büsing, Sigrid Knust |
ISCO | 3 |
| 2016 | The assignment problem with nearly Monge arrays and incompatible partner indicesabstractIn this paper we study the d-dimensional assignment problem in which entries of the cost array satisfy the Monge property, except for ∞-entries, which may violate it. We assume that the ∞-entries are incurred by incompatible partner indices and their number is bounded by an upper bound λ for each index. We show that the problem can be solved in linear time for fixed d and λ, and it becomes strongly NP-hard if d or λ is part of the input. Christian Weiß 0003, Sigrid Knust, Natalia V. Shakhlevich, Stefan Waldherr |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 2015 | Message scheduling for real-time interprocessor communication
Stefan Waldherr, Sigrid Knust, Stefan Aust |
J. Syst. Archit. | 2 |
| 2015 | A Review and Taxonomy of Interactive Optimization Methods in Operations ResearchabstractThis article presents a review and a classification of interactive optimization methods. These interactive methods are used for solving optimization problems. The interaction with an end user or decision maker aims at improving the efficiency of the optimization procedure, enriching the optimization model, or informing the user regarding the solutions proposed by the optimization system. First, we present the challenges of using optimization methods as a tool for supporting decision making, and we justify the integration of the user in the optimization process. This integration is generally achieved via a dynamic interaction between the user and the system. Next, the different classes of interactive optimization approaches are presented. This detailed review includes trial and error, interactive reoptimization, interactive multiobjective optimization, interactive evolutionary algorithms, human-guided search, and other approaches that are less well covered in the research literature. On the basis of this review, we propose a classification that aims to better describe and compare interaction mechanisms. This classification offers two complementary views on interactive optimization methods. The first perspective focuses on the user’s contribution to the optimization process, and the second concerns the components of interactive optimization systems. Finally, on the basis of this review and classification, we identify some open issues and potential perspectives for interactive optimization methods. David Meignan, Sigrid Knust, Jean-Marc Frayret, Gilles Pesant, Nicolas Gaud |
ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. | 2 |
| 2010 | Constructing fair sports league schedules with regard to strength groups
Dirk Briskorn, Sigrid Knust |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 2002 | A tabu search algorithm for scheduling a single robot in a job-shop environment
Johann L. Hurink, Sigrid Knust |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 2001 | Makespan minimization for flow-shop problems with transportation times and a single robot
Johann L. Hurink, Sigrid Knust |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 2000 | Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling and Timetabling
Peter Brucker, Sigrid Knust |
PATAT | 2 |