EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ricky Rosen
dblp:85/3467
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 5 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational complexity · 91% Algorithms and data structures · 9% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › probabilistically checkable proofs
parallel repetition |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A Strong Parallel Repetition Theorem for Projection Games on Expanders · CCC 2012 |
Computational complexity
proof complexity |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A Strong Parallel Repetition Theorem for Projection Games on Expanders · CCC 2012 |
Computational complexity
two-prover games |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A Strong Parallel Repetition Theorem for Projection Games on Expanders · CCC 2012 |
Computational complexity › lattice problems
closest vector problem |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Lattice problems and norm embeddings · STOC 2006 |
Computational complexity
lattice problems |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Lattice problems and norm embeddings · STOC 2006 |
Algorithms and data structures › metric embedding
norm embedding |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Lattice problems and norm embeddings · STOC 2006 |
Computational complexity › lattice problems
shortest vector problem |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Lattice problems and norm embeddings · STOC 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral gap · 0.1expander graphs · 0.1reduction · 0.1norm embeddings · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | A Strong Parallel Repetition Theorem for Projection Games on ExpandersabstractThe parallel repetition theorem states that for any Two Prover Game with value at most 1-€ (for €3)Ω(n/s), where s is the length of the answers of the two provers [24], [17]. For Projection Games, the bound on the value of the game repeated n times in parallel was improved to (1 - €2)Ω(n)[23] and this bound was shown to be tight [25]. In this paper we study the case where the underlying distribution, according to which the questions for the two provers are generated, is uniform over the edges of a (bipartite) expander graph. We show that if λ is the (normalized) spectral gap of the underlying graph, the value of the repeated game is at most (1 - €2)Ω(c(λ)·n/s), where c(λ) = poly(λ); and if in addition the game is a projection game, we obtain a bound of (1 - €)Ω(c(λ)·n), where c(λ) = poly(λ), that is, a strong parallel repetition theorem (when λ is constant). This gives a strong parallel repetition theorem for a large class of two prover games. Ran Raz, Ricky Rosen |
CCC | 2 |
| 2010 | A K-Provers Parallel Repetition Theorem for a Version of No-Signaling Model
Ricky Rosen |
COCOON | 1 |
| 2009 | Strong Parallel Repetition Theorem for Free Projection Games
Boaz Barak, Anup Rao 0001, Ran Raz, Ricky Rosen, Ronen Shaltiel |
APPROX-RANDOM | 4 |
| 2006 | Lattice problems and norm embeddingsabstractWe present reductions from lattice problems in the l2 norm to the corresponding problems in other norms such as l1, l∞ (and in fact in any other lp norm where 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞). We consider lattice problems such as the Shortest Vector Problem, Shortest Independent Vector Problem, Closest Vector Problem and the Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing. Most reductions are simple and follow from known constructions of embeddings of normed spaces.Among other things, our reductions imply that the Shortest Vector Problem in the l1 norm and the Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing in the l∞ norm are hard to approximate to within any constant (and beyond). Previously, the former problem was known to be hard to approximate to within 2-ε, while no hardness result was known for the latter problem. Oded Regev 0001, Ricky Rosen |
STOC | 2 |
| 2006 | A note on Unique Games
Adi Avidor, Ricky Rosen |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 2 |