Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Igor Malioutov

dblp:85/3958 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4058-6638ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 91% Language models and text generation · 8% Speech recognition and synthesis · 1%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval
learned sparse retrieval
0.912025
An Alternative to FLOPS Regularization to Effectively Productionize SPLADE-Doc · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.912025
An Alternative to FLOPS Regularization to Effectively Productionize SPLADE-Doc · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
search engines
0.912025
An Alternative to FLOPS Regularization to Effectively Productionize SPLADE-Doc · SIGIR 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.512021
Cross-Register Projection for Headline Part of Speech Tagging · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.412020
Semantic Role Labeling as Syntactic Dependency Parsing · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling
0.412020
Semantic Role Labeling as Syntactic Dependency Parsing · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language acquisition
0.212013
Language Acquisition and Probabilistic Models: keeping it simple · ACL (1) 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
open information extraction
0.112021
Cross-Register Projection for Headline Part of Speech Tagging · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text segmentation
0.122007
Making Sense of Sound: Unsupervised Topic Segmentation over Acoustic Input · ACL 2007
Minimum Cut Model for Spoken Lecture Segmentation · ACL 2006
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph partitioning
0.012006
Minimum Cut Model for Spoken Lecture Segmentation · ACL 2006
Coding theory
network coding
0.012006
Minimum Cut Model for Spoken Lecture Segmentation · ACL 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

FLOPS regularization · 0.9DF-FLOPS · 0.9multi-domain training · 0.5annotation projection · 0.5joint labeling · 0.4dependency parsing · 0.4normalized cut · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 An Alternative to FLOPS Regularization to Effectively Productionize SPLADE-Doc
abstract
Learned Sparse Retrieval (LSR) models encode text as weighted term vectors, which need to be sparse to leverage inverted index structures during retrieval. SPLADE, the most popular LSR model, uses FLOPS regularization to encourage vector sparsity during training. However, FLOPS regularization does not ensure sparsity among terms-only within a given query or document. Terms with very high Document Frequencies (DFs) substantially increase latency in production retrieval engines, such as Apache Solr, due to their lengthy posting lists. To address the issue of high DFs, we present a new variant of FLOPS regularization: DF-FLOPS. This new regularization technique penalizes the usage of high-DF terms, thereby shortening posting lists and reducing retrieval latency. Unlike other inference-time sparsification methods, such as stopword removal, DF-FLOPS regularization allows for the selective inclusion of high-frequency terms in cases where the terms are truly salient. We find that DF-FLOPS successfully reduces the prevalence of high-DF terms and lowers retrieval latency (around 10x faster) in a production-grade engine while maintaining effectiveness both in-domain (only a 2.2-point drop in MRR@10) and cross-domain (improved performance in 12 out of 13 tasks on which we tested). With retrieval latencies on par with BM25, this work provides an important step towards making LSR practical for deployment in production-grade search engines.
Aldo Porco, Dhruv Mehra, Igor Malioutov, Karthik Radhakrishnan, Moniba Keymanesh, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Sean MacAvaney, Pengxiang Cheng 0001
SIGIR3
2021 Cross-Register Projection for Headline Part of Speech Tagging
abstract
Part of speech (POS) tagging is a familiar NLP task.State of the art taggers routinely achieve token-level accuracies of over 97% on news body text, evidence that the problem is wellunderstood.However, the register of English news headlines, "headlinese", is very different from the register of long-form text, causing POS tagging models to underperform on headlines.In this work, we automatically annotate news headlines with POS tags by projecting predicted tags from corresponding sentences in news bodies.We train a multi-domain POS tagger on both long-form and headline text and show that joint training on both registers improves over training on just one or naïvely concatenating training sets.We evaluate on a newly-annotated corpus of over 5,248 English news headlines from the Google sentence compression corpus, and show that our model yields a 23% relative error reduction per token and 19% per headline.In addition, we demonstrate that better headline POS tags can improve the performance of a syntax-based open information extraction system.We make POSH, the POS-tagged Headline corpus, available to encourage research in improved NLP models for news headlines.
Adrian Benton, Igor Malioutov
EMNLP (1)3
2021 Diversity-Aware Batch Active Learning for Dependency Parsing
abstract
Tianze Shi, Adrian Benton, Igor Malioutov, Ozan İrsoy. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021.
Tianze Shi, Adrian Benton, Igor Malioutov, Ozan Irsoy
NAACL-HLT3
2021 Learning Syntax from Naturally-Occurring Bracketings
abstract
Tianze Shi, Ozan İrsoy, Igor Malioutov, Lillian Lee. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021.
Tianze Shi, Ozan Irsoy, Igor Malioutov, Lillian Lee
NAACL-HLT3
2020 Semantic Role Labeling as Syntactic Dependency Parsing
abstract
We reduce the task of (span-based) PropBankstyle semantic role labeling (SRL) to syntactic dependency parsing.Our approach is motivated by our empirical analysis that shows three common syntactic patterns account for over 98% of the SRL annotations for both English and Chinese data.Based on this observation, we present a conversion scheme that packs SRL annotations into dependency tree representations through joint labels that permit highly accurate recovery back to the original format.This representation allows us to train statistical dependency parsers to tackle SRL and achieve competitive performance with the current state of the art.Our findings show the promise of syntactic dependency trees in encoding semantic role relations within their syntactic domain of locality, and point to potential further integration of syntactic methods into semantic role labeling in the future.
Tianze Shi, Igor Malioutov, Ozan Irsoy
EMNLP (1)2
2013 Language Acquisition and Probabilistic Models: keeping it simple
Aline Villavicencio, Marco Idiart, Robert C. Berwick, Igor Malioutov
ACL (1)4
2010 Improving statistical parsing by linguistic regularization
abstract
Statistically-based parsers for large corpora, in particular the Penn Tree Bank (PTB), typically have not used all the linguistic information encoded in the annotated trees on which they are trained. In particular, they have not in general used information that records the effects of derivations, such as empty categories and the representation of displaced phrases, as is the case with passive, topicalization, and wh-constructions. Here we explore ways to use this information to “unwind” derivations, yielding a regularized underlying syntactic structure that can be used as an additional source of information for more accurate parsing. In effect, we make use of two joint sets of tree structures for parsing: the surface structure and its corresponding underlying structure where arguments have been restored to their canonical positions. We present a pilot experiment on passives in the PTB indicating that through the use of these two syntactic representations we can improve overall parsing performance by exploiting transformational regularities, in this way paring down the search space of possible syntactic analyses.
Igor Malioutov, Robert C. Berwick
ISDA1
2007 Making Sense of Sound: Unsupervised Topic Segmentation over Acoustic Input
Igor Malioutov, Alex Park 0001, Regina Barzilay, James R. Glass
ACL1
2007 Recent progress in the MIT spoken lecture processing project
abstract
In this paper we discuss our research activities in the area of spoken lecture processing. Our goal is to improve the access to on-line audio/visual recordings of academic lectures by developing tools for the processing, transcription, indexing, segmentation, summarization, retrieval and browsing of this media. In this paper, we provide an overview of the technology components and systems that have been developed as part of this project, present some experimental results, and discuss our ongoing and future research plans. Index Terms:spoken lecture processing, spoken document retrieval, audio browsing
James R. Glass, Timothy J. Hazen, D. Scott Cyphers, Igor Malioutov, David Huynh, Regina Barzilay
INTERSPEECH4
2006 Minimum Cut Model for Spoken Lecture Segmentation
abstract
We consider the task of unsupervised lecture segmentation. We formalize segmentation as a graph-partitioning task that optimizes the normalized cut criterion. Our approach moves beyond localized comparisons and takes into account long-range cohesion dependencies. Our results demonstrate that global analysis improves the segmentation accuracy and is robust in the presence of speech recognition errors.
Igor Malioutov, Regina Barzilay
ACL1
2006 Parallelization of Geant4 Using TOP-C and Marshalgen
abstract
Geant4 is a very large, highly accurate toolkit for Monte Carlo simulation of particle-matter interaction. It has been applied to high-energy physics, cosmic ray modeling, radiation shields, radiation therapy, mine detection, and other areas. Geant4 is being used to help design some high energy physics experiments (notably CMS and Atlas) to be run on the future large hadron collider: the largest particle collider in the world. The parallelization, ParGeant4, represents a challenge due to the unique characteristics of Geant4: (i) complex object-oriented design; (ii) intrinsic use of templates and abstract classes to be instantiated later by the end user; (iii) large program with many developers; and (iv) frequent releases. The key issue for parallelization is not just how to parallelize "correctly" but also how to parallelize "with minimum effort". In addition, the parallelization should make as few assumptions about the source code as possible, due to the frequent release schedule of Geant4. We use TOP-C (Task Oriented Parallel C/C++) for parallelization and Marshalgen for marshaling/ serialization. In some examples on a cluster of 100 nodes yielded a speedup of up to 94.4. The code’s portability, scalability and performance are also discussed.
Gene Cooperman, Viet Ha Nguyen 0003, Igor Malioutov
NCA3
2005 Fusion of biometric algorithms in the recognition problem
Andrew L. Rukhin, Igor Malioutov
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2