Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chi-Feung Wu

dblp:85/5087 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Routing and switching · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › switching networks › multistage interconnection network
clos network
0.222011
Quasi-Output-Buffered Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2011
Quasi-Output-Buffered Switches · INFOCOM 2008
Routing and switching › switching systems
output-buffered switch
0.222011
Quasi-Output-Buffered Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2011
Quasi-Output-Buffered Switches · INFOCOM 2008
Routing and switching
switching
0.112011
Quasi-Output-Buffered Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2011
Routing and switching
switch architecture
0.112008
Quasi-Output-Buffered Switches · INFOCOM 2008
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.012011
Quasi-Output-Buffered Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recursive construction · 0.4inclusion-exclusion · 0.2simulation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Quasi-Output-Buffered Switches
abstract
It is well known that output-buffered switches have better performance than other switch architectures. However, output buffered switches also suffer from the notorious scalability problem, and direct constructions of large output-buffered switches are difficult. In this paper, we study the problem of constructing scalable switches that have comparable performance (in the sense of 100 percent throughput and first-in first-out (FIFO) delivery of packets from the same flow) to output-buffered switches. For this, we propose a new concept, called quasi-output-buffered switch. Like an output-buffered switch, a quasi-output-buffered switch is a deterministic switch that achieves 100 percent throughput and delivers packets from the same flow in the FIFO order. Using the three stage Clos network, we show that one can recursively construct a larger quasi-output-buffered switch with a set of smaller quasi output-buffered switches. By recursively expanding the three-stage Clos network, we obtain a quasi-output-buffered switch with only 2 × 2 switches. Such a switch is called a packet-pair switch in this paper as it always transmits packets in pairs. By computer simulations, we show that packet-pair switches have better delay performance than most load-balanced switches with comparable construction complexity.
Cheng-Shang Chang, Jay Cheng, Duan-Shin Lee, Chi-Feung Wu
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.4
2008 Quasi-Output-Buffered Switches
abstract
Output-buffered switches are known to have better performance than other switch architectures. However, output- buffered switches also suffer from the notorious scalability problem, and direct constructions of large output-buffered switches are difficult. In this paper, we study the problem of constructing scalable switches that have comparable performance to output- buffered switches. For this, we propose a new concept, called quasi-output-buffered switch. Like an output-buffered switch, a quasi-output-buffered switch is a deterministic switch that delivers packets in the FIFO order and achieves 100% throughput. Using the three-stage Clos network, we show that one can recursively construct a larger quasi-output-buffered switch with a set of smaller quasi-output-buffered switches. By recursively expanding the three-stage Clos network, we obtain a quasi-output-buffered switch with only 2 x 2 switches. Such a switch is called a packet- pair switch as it always transmits packets in pairs. By computer simulations, we show that packet-pair switches have better delay performance than most load-balanced switches with comparable construction complexity.
Cheng-Shang Chang, Jay Cheng, Duan-Shin Lee, Chi-Feung Wu
INFOCOM4