Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Romain Dupont
dblp:85/5159
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
displacement estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › registration
non-rigid registration |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › multi-view stereo
stereo reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › 3d registration
surface registration |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
wide-baseline stereo |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
total generalized variation · 0.2feature-based matching · 0.2AD-Census · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Self-Improving SLAM in Dynamic Environments: Learning When to Mask
Adrian Bojko, Romain Dupont, Mohamed Tamaazousti, Hervé Le Borgne |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2020 | Learning to Segment Dynamic Objects using SLAM OutliersabstractWe present a method to automatically learn to segment dynamic objects using SLAM outliers. It requires only one monocular sequence per dynamic object for training and consists in localizing dynamic objects using SLAM outliers, creating their masks, and using these masks to train a semantic segmentation network. We integrate the trained network in ORB-SLAM 2 and LDSO. At runtime we remove features on dynamic objects, making the SLAM unaffected by them. We also propose a new stereo dataset and new metrics to evaluate SLAM robustness. Our dataset includes consensus inversions, i.e., situations where the SLAM uses more features on dynamic objects that on the static background. Consensus inversions are challenging for SLAM as they may cause major SLAM failures. Our approach performs better than the State-of-the-Art on the TUM RGB-D dataset in monocular mode and on our dataset in both monocular and stereo modes. Adrian Bojko, Romain Dupont, Mohamed Tamaazousti, Hervé Le Borgne |
ICPR | 2 |
| 2017 | EasyFlow: increasing the convergence basin of variational image matching with a feature-based costabstractDense motion field estimation is a key computer vision problem. Many solutions have been proposed to compute small or large displacements, narrow or wide baseline stereo disparity, or non‐rigid surface registration, but a unified methodology is still lacking. The authors introduce a general framework that robustly combines direct and feature‐based matching. The feature‐based cost is built around a novel robust distance function that handles keypoints and weak features such as segments. It allows us to use putative feature matches to guide dense motion estimation out of local minima. The authors’ framework uses a robust direct data term. It is implemented with a powerful second‐order regularisation with external and self‐occlusion reasoning. Their framework achieves state‐of‐the‐art performance in several cases (standard optical flow benchmarks, wide‐baseline stereo and non‐rigid surface registration). Their framework has a modular design that customises to specific application needs. Jim Braux-Zin, Romain Dupont, Adrien Bartoli, Mohamed Tamaazousti |
IET Comput. Vis. | 2 |
| 2013 | Combining Features and Intensity for Wide-Baseline Non-Rigid Surface RegistrationabstractInternational audience Jim Braux-Zin, Romain Dupont, Adrien Bartoli |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2013 | A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based CostsabstractDense motion field estimation (typically optical flow, stereo disparity and surface registration) is a key computer vision problem. Many solutions have been proposed to compute small or large displacements, narrow or wide baseline stereo disparity, but a unified methodology is still lacking. We here introduce a general framework that robustly combines direct and feature-based matching. The feature-based cost is built around a novel robust distance function that handles key points and ``weak'' features such as segments. It allows us to use putative feature matches which may contain mismatches to guide dense motion estimation out of local minima. Our framework uses a robust direct data term (AD-Census). It is implemented with a powerful second order Total Generalized Variation regularization with external and self-occlusion reasoning. Our framework achieves state of the art performance in several cases (standard optical flow benchmarks, wide-baseline stereo and non-rigid surface registration). Our framework has a modular design that customizes to specific application needs. Jim Braux-Zin, Romain Dupont, Adrien Bartoli |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2012 | Extracting planar structures efficiently with revisited BetaSAC
Marion Decrouez, Romain Dupont, François Gaspard, James L. Crowley |
ICPR | 2 |