Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pragya Srivastava
dblp:85/5227
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8547-1244ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Language models and text generation · 33% Graph learning · 17% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
associative recall |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding and Mitigating Bottlenecks of State Space Models through the Lens of Recency and Over-smoothing · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
long-range dependency modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding and Mitigating Bottlenecks of State Space Models through the Lens of Recency and Over-smoothing · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding and Mitigating Bottlenecks of State Space Models through the Lens of Recency and Over-smoothing · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding and Mitigating Bottlenecks of State Space Models through the Lens of Recency and Over-smoothing · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | NICE: To Optimize In-Context Examples or Not? · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting › prompt engineering
prompt optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | NICE: To Optimize In-Context Examples or Not? · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | NICE: To Optimize In-Context Examples or Not? · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
theoretical analysis · 0.9polarization of state transition matrices · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.8in-context example optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Understanding and Mitigating Bottlenecks of State Space Models through the Lens of Recency and Over-smoothingabstractStructured State Space Models (SSMs) have emerged as alternatives to transformers.
While SSMs are often regarded as effective in capturing long-sequence dependencies, we rigorously demonstrate that they are inherently limited by strong recency bias.
Our empirical studies also reveal that this bias impairs the models' ability to recall distant information and introduces robustness issues. Our scaling experiments then discovered that deeper structures in SSMs can facilitate the learning of long contexts.
However, subsequent theoretical analysis reveals that as SSMs increase in depth, they exhibit another inevitable tendency toward over-smoothing, e.g., token representations becoming increasingly indistinguishable.
This *fundamental dilemma* between recency and over-smoothing hinders the scalability of existing SSMs.
Inspired by our theoretical findings, we propose to *polarize* two channels of the state transition matrices in SSMs, setting them to zero and one, respectively, simultaneously addressing recency bias and over-smoothing.
Experiments demonstrate that our polarization technique consistently enhances the associative recall accuracy of long-range tokens and unlocks SSMs to benefit further from deeper architectures.
All source codes are released at https://github.com/VITA-Group/SSM-Bottleneck. Peihao Wang, Ruisi Cai, Yuehao Wang, Pragya Srivastava, Zhangyang Wang, Pan Li 0005 |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2024 | NICE: To Optimize In-Context Examples or Not?abstractRecent work shows that in-context learning and optimization of in-context examples (ICE) can significantly improve the accuracy of large language models (LLMs) on a wide range of tasks, leading to an apparent consensus that ICE optimization is crucial for better performance.However, most of these studies assume a fixed or no instruction provided in the prompt.We challenge this consensus by investigating the necessity of optimizing ICE when task-specific instructions are provided and find that there are many tasks for which it yields diminishing returns.In particular, using a diverse set of tasks and a systematically created instruction set with gradually added details, we find that as the prompt instruction becomes more detailed, the returns on ICE optimization diminish.To characterize this behavior, we introduce a taskspecific metric called Normalized Invariability to Choice of Examples (NICE) that quantifies the learnability of tasks from a given instruction, and provides a heuristic to help decide whether to optimize instructions or ICE for a new task.Given a task, the proposed metric can reliably predict the utility of optimizing ICE compared to using random ICE.Our code is available at https://github.com/microsoft/nice- icl. Pragya Srivastava, Satvik Golechha, Amit Sharma 0007 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2005 | Comparative analysis of chromatin landscape in regulatory regions of human housekeeping and tissue specific genesabstractBACKGROUND: Global regulatory mechanisms involving chromatin assembly and remodelling in the promoter regions of genes is implicated in eukaryotic transcription control especially for genes subjected to spatial and temporal regulation. The potential to utilise global regulatory mechanisms for controlling gene expression might depend upon the architecture of the chromatin in and around the gene. In-silico analysis can yield important insights into this aspect, facilitating comparison of two or more classes of genes comprising of a large number of genes within each group. RESULTS: In the present study, we carried out a comparative analysis of chromatin characteristics in terms of the scaffold/matrix attachment regions, nucleosome formation potential and the occurrence of repetitive sequences, in the upstream regulatory regions of housekeeping and tissue specific genes. Our data show that putative scaffold/matrix attachment regions are more abundant and nucleosome formation potential is higher in the 5' regions of tissue specific genes as compared to the housekeeping genes. CONCLUSION: The differences in the chromatin features between the two groups of genes indicate the involvement of chromatin organisation in the control of gene expression. The presence of global regulatory mechanisms mediated through chromatin organisation can decrease the burden of invoking gene specific regulators for maintenance of the active/silenced state of gene expression. This could partially explain the lower number of genes estimated in the human genome. Mythily Ganapathi, Pragya Srivastava, Sushanta Kumar Das Sutar, Dipayan Dasgupta, Gajinder Pal Singh, Vani Brahmachari, Samir K. Brahmachari |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |