Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

E. James Prendergast

dblp:85/55 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 87% Integrated circuit design · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › design for manufacturability › statistical design
design centering
0.011990
Technology CAD for competitive products · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1990
Electronic design automation
technology computer-aided design
0.011990
Technology CAD for competitive products · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Applying lessons learned from TDDB testing
abstract
Since 1979 various papers and have been published on modeling the gate dielectric using Time Dependent Dielectric Breakdown (TDDB) testing. There are primarily 2 models used, the linear E field model and the 1/E field model. These are based on different failure kinetics and both predict vastly different lifetimes for the dielectric. As a result the majority of I.C. manufacturers used the 1/E model for reliability predictions.
E. James Prendergast
ITC1
1990 Technology CAD for competitive products
abstract
Recent trends in the integration of process-, device-, and circuit-modeling tools and the current rapid emergence of Unix-based computing environments of networked workstations and computer engines makes possible user-friendly, task-based CAD systems for technology optimization, characterization, and cell design. The authors discuss these trends and identify opportunities to use technology CAD tools in the development of competitive technologies and products. It is shown that the ability to provide design centering and extreme-case analysis related to process variables has been a key to aggressive design of robust IC products. This capability results from efforts in the early to mid-1980's to establish integrated modeling systems such as MECCA, the application of general-purpose optimization capabilities such as WATOPT and CENTER, and recent advances in open and powerful computing environments (principally Unix-based distributed resources).>
Peter Lloyd, Heinz K. Dirks, E. James Prendergast, Kishore Singhal
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.3