Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sarah J. Aerni
dblp:85/5875
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
bioimage analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Automated cellular annotation for high-resolution images of adult Caenorhabditis elegans · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › bioimage analysis
microscopy image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Automated cellular annotation for high-resolution images of adult Caenorhabditis elegans · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
genealogical inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Reconstruction of genealogical relationships with applications to Phase III of HapMap · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Reconstruction of genealogical relationships with applications to Phase III of HapMap · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
association analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Reconstruction of genealogical relationships with applications to Phase III of HapMap · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimum-cost maximum-flow · 0.2cross-entropy-based learning · 0.2combinatorial optimization · 0.2linkage information · 0.1classification with rotations · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Automated cellular annotation for high-resolution images of adult Caenorhabditis elegansabstractMOTIVATION: Advances in high-resolution microscopy have recently made possible the analysis of gene expression at the level of individual cells. The fixed lineage of cells in the adult worm Caenorhabditis elegans makes this organism an ideal model for studying complex biological processes like development and aging. However, annotating individual cells in images of adult C.elegans typically requires expertise and significant manual effort. Automation of this task is therefore critical to enabling high-resolution studies of a large number of genes. RESULTS: In this article, we describe an automated method for annotating a subset of 154 cells (including various muscle, intestinal and hypodermal cells) in high-resolution images of adult C.elegans. We formulate the task of labeling cells within an image as a combinatorial optimization problem, where the goal is to minimize a scoring function that compares cells in a test input image with cells from a training atlas of manually annotated worms according to various spatial and morphological characteristics. We propose an approach for solving this problem based on reduction to minimum-cost maximum-flow and apply a cross-entropy-based learning algorithm to tune the weights of our scoring function. We achieve 84% median accuracy across a set of 154 cell labels in this highly variable system. These results demonstrate the feasibility of the automatic annotation of microscopy-based images in adult C.elegans. Sarah J. Aerni, Xiao Liu 0053, Chuong B. Do, Samuel S. Gross, Andy Nguyen, Stephen D. Guo, Fuhui Long, Hanchuan Peng, Stuart S. Kim, Serafim Batzoglou |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2012 | Reconstructing cancer genomes from paired-end sequencing dataabstractBACKGROUND: A cancer genome is derived from the germline genome through a series of somatic mutations. Somatic structural variants - including duplications, deletions, inversions, translocations, and other rearrangements - result in a cancer genome that is a scrambling of intervals, or "blocks" of the germline genome sequence. We present an efficient algorithm for reconstructing the block organization of a cancer genome from paired-end DNA sequencing data. RESULTS: By aligning paired reads from a cancer genome - and a matched germline genome, if available - to the human reference genome, we derive: (i) a partition of the reference genome into intervals; (ii) adjacencies between these intervals in the cancer genome; (iii) an estimated copy number for each interval. We formulate the Copy Number and Adjacency Genome Reconstruction Problem of determining the cancer genome as a sequence of the derived intervals that is consistent with the measured adjacencies and copy numbers. We design an efficient algorithm, called Paired-end Reconstruction of Genome Organization (PREGO), to solve this problem by reducing it to an optimization problem on an interval-adjacency graph constructed from the data. The solution to the optimization problem results in an Eulerian graph, containing an alternating Eulerian tour that corresponds to a cancer genome that is consistent with the sequencing data. We apply our algorithm to five ovarian cancer genomes that were sequenced as part of The Cancer Genome Atlas. We identify numerous rearrangements, or structural variants, in these genomes, analyze reciprocal vs. non-reciprocal rearrangements, and identify rearrangements consistent with known mechanisms of duplication such as tandem duplications and breakage/fusion/bridge (B/F/B) cycles. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that PREGO efficiently identifies complex and biologically relevant rearrangements in cancer genome sequencing data. An implementation of the PREGO algorithm is available at http://compbio.cs.brown.edu/software/. Layla Oesper, Anna M. Ritz, Sarah J. Aerni, Ryan Drebin, Benjamin J. Raphael |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2011 | Reconstruction of genealogical relationships with applications to Phase III of HapMapabstractMOTIVATION: Accurate inference of genealogical relationships between pairs of individuals is paramount in association studies, forensics and evolutionary analyses of wildlife populations. Current methods for relationship inference consider only a small set of close relationships and have limited to no power to distinguish between relationships with the same number of meioses separating the individuals under consideration (e.g. aunt-niece versus niece-aunt or first cousins versus great aunt-niece). RESULTS: We present CARROT (ClAssification of Relationships with ROTations), a novel framework for relationship inference that leverages linkage information to differentiate between rotated relationships, that is, between relationships with the same number of common ancestors and the same number of meioses separating the individuals under consideration. We demonstrate that CARROT clearly outperforms existing methods on simulated data. We also applied CARROT on four populations from Phase III of the HapMap Project and detected previously unreported pairs of third- and fourth-degree relatives. AVAILABILITY: Source code for CARROT is freely available at http://carrot.stanford.edu. CONTACT: [email protected]. Sofia Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou, Dorna Kashef Haghighi, Sarah J. Aerni, Andreas Sundquist, Sivan Bercovici, Serafim Batzoglou |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2006 | 10 Years of the International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB)
Sarah J. Aerni, Eleazar Eskin |
RECOMB | 1 |