Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dawn Dew
dblp:85/6989
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The 'subsequent artificial neural network' (SANN) approach might bring more classificatory power to ANN-based DNA microarray analyses · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression classification
microarray classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The 'subsequent artificial neural network' (SANN) approach might bring more classificatory power to ANN-based DNA microarray analyses · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › cancer classification
multi-class tumor classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The 'subsequent artificial neural network' (SANN) approach might bring more classificatory power to ANN-based DNA microarray analyses · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The 'subsequent artificial neural network' (SANN) approach might bring more classificatory power to ANN-based DNA microarray analyses · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
coupled classifier cascade · 0.0artificial neural network · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | The 'subsequent artificial neural network' (SANN) approach might bring more classificatory power to ANN-based DNA microarray analysesabstractMOTIVATION: Human decisions often proceed in two steps. Initially those most preferred are chosen followed by a subsequent choice of these preferences. Applying one artificial neural network (ANN), a classification is limited to the preselection process. The final categorization is only possible by a subsequent ANN that distinguishes the pre-chosen classes. Existing strategies using coupled ANNs are discussed and a new approach particularly suited for multiclass classification problems is introduced ('Subsequent ANN', SANN). RESULTS: Evaluating a simulated data base comprising 3 classes, classification results of SANN were obviously superior to those achieved by ANN. To evaluate a real-world data base the microarray benchmark GCM (14 classes) was chosen. The ANN results reached 72%, comparable to previous results. Using SANN, up to 81% of the tumors were correctly classified. AVAILABILITY: Programs used in this work and numerical results are available upon request. Roland Linder, Dawn Dew, Holger Sudhoff, Dirk Theegarten, Klaus Remberger, Siegfried J. Pöppl, Mathias Wagner II |
Bioinform. | 2 |