Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhengyi Li 0004
dblp:85/9245-4
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-3899-0057ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Security and privacy · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.7 | 3 | 2016 | Differentially private frequent itemset mining via transaction splitting · ICDE 2016 Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining via Transaction Splitting · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 Differentially private frequent sequence mining via sampling-based candidate pruning · ICDE 2015 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.5 | 3 | 2016 | Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining via Transaction Splitting · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 Differentially private frequent sequence mining via sampling-based candidate pruning · ICDE 2015 Differentially private frequent itemset mining via transaction splitting · ICDE 2016 |
Data mining › pattern mining › itemset mining
frequent itemset mining |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Differentially private frequent itemset mining via transaction splitting · ICDE 2016 Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining via Transaction Splitting · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 |
Data mining › pattern mining › sequential pattern mining
frequent sequence mining |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Differentially private frequent sequence mining via sampling-based candidate pruning · ICDE 2015 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private query answering › private data analysis
differentially private data mining |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Differentially private frequent sequence mining via sampling-based candidate pruning · ICDE 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transaction splitting · 0.9threshold relaxation · 0.4sequence shrinking · 0.4sampling-based candidate pruning · 0.4run-time support estimation · 0.4differential privacy · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Differentially private frequent itemset mining via transaction splittingabstractFrequent itemset mining (FIM) is one of the most fundamental problems in data mining. It has practical importance in a wide range of application areas such as decision support, Web usage mining, bioinformatics, etc. Given a database, where each transaction contains a set of items, FIM tries to find itemsets that occur in transactions more frequently than a given threshold. Despite valuable insights the discovery of frequent itemsets can potentially provide, if the data is sensitive (e.g., web browsing history and medical records), releasing the discovered frequent itemsets might pose considerable threats to individual privacy. Sen Su, Shengzhi Xu, Xiang Cheng 0003, Zhengyi Li 0004, Fangchun Yang |
ICDE | 4 |
| 2015 | Differentially private frequent sequence mining via sampling-based candidate pruningabstractIn this paper, we study the problem of mining frequent sequences under the rigorous differential privacy model. We explore the possibility of designing a differentially private frequent sequence mining (FSM) algorithm which can achieve both high data utility and a high degree of privacy. We found, in differentially private FSM, the amount of required noise is proportionate to the number of candidate sequences. If we could effectively reduce the number of unpromising candidate sequences, the utility and privacy tradeoff can be significantly improved. To this end, by leveraging a sampling-based candidate pruning technique, we propose a novel differentially private FSM algorithm, which is referred to as PFS2. The core of our algorithm is to utilize sample databases to further prune the candidate sequences generated based on the downward closure property. In particular, we use the noisy local support of candidate sequences in the sample databases to estimate which sequences are potentially frequent. To improve the accuracy of such private estimations, a sequence shrinking method is proposed to enforce the length constraint on the sample databases. Moreover, to decrease the probability of misestimating frequent sequences as infrequent, a threshold relaxation method is proposed to relax the user-specified threshold for the sample databases. Through formal privacy analysis, we show that our PFS2algorithm is ϵ-differentially private. Extensive experiments on real datasets illustrate that our PFS2algorithm can privately find frequent sequences with high accuracy. Shengzhi Xu, Sen Su, Xiang Cheng 0003, Zhengyi Li 0004, Li Xiong 0001 |
ICDE | 4 |
| 2015 | DP-Apriori: A differentially private frequent itemset mining algorithm based on transaction splitting
Xiang Cheng 0003, Sen Su, Shengzhi Xu, Zhengyi Li 0004 |
Comput. Secur. | 4 |
| 2015 | Differentially private maximal frequent sequence mining
Xiang Cheng 0003, Sen Su, Shengzhi Xu, Peng Tang 0002, Zhengyi Li 0004 |
Comput. Secur. | 5 |
| 2015 | Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining via Transaction SplittingabstractRecently, there has been a growing interest in designing differentially private data mining algorithms. Frequent itemset mining (FIM) is one of the most fundamental problems in data mining. In this paper, we explore the possibility of designing a differentially private FIM algorithm which can not only achieve high data utility and a high degree of privacy, but also offer high time efficiency. To this end, we propose a differentially private FIM algorithm based on the FP-growth algorithm, which is referred to as PFP-growth. The PFP-growth algorithm consists of a preprocessing phase and a mining phase. In the preprocessing phase, to improve the utility and privacy tradeoff, a novel smart splitting method is proposed to transform the database. For a given database, the preprocessing phase needs to be performed only once. In the mining phase, to offset the information loss caused by transaction splitting, we devise a run-time estimation method to estimate the actual support of itemsets in the original database. In addition, by leveraging the downward closure property, we put forward a dynamic reduction method to dynamically reduce the amount of noise added to guarantee privacy during the mining process. Through formal privacy analysis, we show that our PFP-growth algorithm is ε-differentially private. Extensive experiments on real datasets illustrate that our PFP-growth algorithm substantially outperforms the state-of-the-art techniques. Sen Su, Shengzhi Xu, Xiang Cheng 0003, Zhengyi Li 0004, Fangchun Yang |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 4 |