Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim Rieger

dblp:85/9567 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Virtual and augmented reality
augmented reality
0.212015
ARPML: The Augmented Reality Process Modeling Language · ISMAR 2015
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
process modeling
0.212015
ARPML: The Augmented Reality Process Modeling Language · ISMAR 2015
User interface design and tools
authoring tools
0.112015
ARPML: The Augmented Reality Process Modeling Language · ISMAR 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

requirements analysis · 0.7domain-specific language design · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 ARPML: The Augmented Reality Process Modeling Language
abstract
The successful application of augmented reality as a guidance tool for procedural tasks like maintenance or repair requires an easily usable way of modeling support processes. Even though some suggestions have already been made to address this problem, they still have shortcomings and don't provide all the required features. Thus in a first step the requirements a possible solution has to meet are collected and presented. Based on these, the augmented reality process modeling language (ARPML) is developed, which consists of the four building blocks (i) templates, (ii) sensors, (iii) work steps and (iv) tasks. In contrast to existing approaches it facilitates the creation of multiple views on a single process. This makes it possible to specifically select instructions and information needed in targeted work contexts. It also allows to combine multiple variants of one process into one model with only a minimum of redundancy. The application of ARPML is shown with a practical example.
Tobias Muller, Tim Rieger
ISMAR2