Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rémy La

dblp:86/1132 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 83% Mathematical optimization · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.012000
Variable-Sized Bin Packing: Tight Absolute Worst-Case Performance Ratios for Four Approximation Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 2000
Approximation and online algorithms
bin packing
0.012000
Variable-Sized Bin Packing: Tight Absolute Worst-Case Performance Ratios for Four Approximation Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 2000
Approximation and online algorithms › bin packing
variable-sized bin packing
0.012000
Variable-Sized Bin Packing: Tight Absolute Worst-Case Performance Ratios for Four Approximation Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 2000
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.012000
Variable-Sized Bin Packing: Tight Absolute Worst-Case Performance Ratios for Four Approximation Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 2000
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › packing problems
cutting stock problem
0.012000
Variable-Sized Bin Packing: Tight Absolute Worst-Case Performance Ratios for Four Approximation Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

worst-case analysis · 0.0greedy algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Variable-Sized Bin Packing: Tight Absolute Worst-Case Performance Ratios for Four Approximation Algorithms
abstract
In this paper we consider a one-dimensional bin packing problem where the bins do not have identical sizes, or a variable-sized bin packing problem, to minimize the bin consumption, i.e., the total size of the opened bins. The identical size problem has been extensively studied in the literature both for static and dynamic settings. The worst-case or average-case performance has been analyzed. Our problem setting particularly arises in metal cutting industries. Therefore, it presents a great practical relevance. Four greedy approximation algorithms based on a construction approach called largest object first with least absolute waste (LFLAW), largest object first with least relative waste (LFLRW), least absolute waste (LAW), and least relative waste (LRW) are examined. Their absolute worst-case performances are analyzed. The worst case bounds are 2 for LFLAW and LFLRW, 3 for LAW, and 2+ln 2 for LRW. We also show that these worst-case bounds are tight.
Chengbin Chu, Rémy La
SIAM J. Comput.2
1999 Fuzzy rule base learning through simulated annealing
François Guély, Rémy La, Patrick Siarry
Fuzzy Sets Syst.2