Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrés Letelier

dblp:86/11411 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Query processing and optimization · 30% Database theory · 26% Data models and query languages · 26%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database theory
query containment
0.322013
Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2013
Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries · PODS 2012
Data models and query languages › RDF query language
SPARQL
0.322013
Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2013
SPAM: A SPARQL Analysis and Manipulation Tool · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2012
Query processing and optimization › query optimization › graph query optimization
SPARQL query optimization
0.322013
Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2013
Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries · PODS 2012
Indexing and storage engines › tree structures
pattern tree
0.212013
Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2013
Knowledge graphs › semantic web
semantic web data
0.012013
Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2013
Program analysis
static analysis
0.012012
SPAM: A SPARQL Analysis and Manipulation Tool · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pattern tree · 0.2normal form transformation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries
abstract
Static analysis is a fundamental task in query optimization. In this article we study static analysis and optimization techniques for SPARQL, which is the standard language for querying Semantic Web data. Of particular interest for us is the optionality feature in SPARQL. It is crucial in Semantic Web data management, where data sources are inherently incomplete and the user is usually interested in partial answers to queries. This feature is one of the most complicated constructors in SPARQL and also the one that makes this language depart from classical query languages such as relational conjunctive queries. We focus on the class of well-designed SPARQL queries, which has been proposed in the literature as a fragment of the language with good properties regarding query evaluation. We first propose a tree representation for SPARQL queries, called pattern trees, which captures the class of well-designed SPARQL graph patterns. Among other results, we propose several rules that can be used to transform pattern trees into a simple normal form, and study equivalence and containment. We also study the evaluation and enumeration problems for this class of queries.
Andrés Letelier, Jorge Pérez 0001, Reinhard Pichler, Sebastian Skritek
ACM Trans. Database Syst.1
2012 Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries
abstract
Static analysis is a fundamental task in query optimization. In this paper we study static analysis and optimization techniques for SPARQL, which is the standard language for querying Semantic Web data. Of particular interest for us is the optionality feature in SPARQL. It is crucial in Semantic Web data management, where data sources are inherently incomplete and the user is usually interested in partial answers to queries. This feature is one of the most complicated constructors in SPARQL and also the one that makes this language depart from classical query languages such as relational conjunctive queries. We focus on the class of well-designed SPARQL queries, which has been proposed in the literature as a fragment of the language with good properties regarding query evaluation. We first propose a tree representation for SPARQL queries, called pattern trees, which captures the class of well-designed SPARQL graph patterns and which can be considered as a query execution plan. Among other results, we propose several transformation rules for pattern trees, a simple normal form, and study equivalence and containment. We also study the enumeration and counting problems for this class of queries.
Andrés Letelier, Jorge Pérez 0001, Reinhard Pichler, Sebastian Skritek
PODS1
2012 SPAM: A SPARQL Analysis and Manipulation Tool
abstract
SQL developers are used to having elaborate tools which help them in writing queries. In contrast, the creation of tools to assist users in the development of SPARQL queries is still in its infancy. In this system demo, we present the SPARQL Analysis and Manipulation (SPAM) tool, which provides help for the development of SPARQL queries. The main features of the SPAM tool comprise an editor with both text and graphical interface, as well as various functions for the static and dynamic analysis of SPARQL queries.
Andrés Letelier, Jorge Pérez 0001, Reinhard Pichler, Sebastian Skritek
Proc. VLDB Endow.1