Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Darren Galpin

dblp:86/2743 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.012002
A comparison of three verification techniques: directed testing, pseudo-random testing and property checking · DAC 2002
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
property checking
0.012002
A comparison of three verification techniques: directed testing, pseudo-random testing and property checking · DAC 2002
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › random testing
pseudorandom testing
0.012002
A comparison of three verification techniques: directed testing, pseudo-random testing and property checking · DAC 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

specman · 0.0gateprop · 0.0VHDL bus functional models · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 A comparison of three verification techniques: directed testing, pseudo-random testing and property checking
abstract
This paper describes the verification of two versions of a bridge between two on-chip buses. The verification was performed just as the Infineon Technologies Design Centre in Bristol was introducing pseudo-random testing (using Specman) and property checking (using GateProp) into their verification flows and thus provides a good opportunity to compare these two techniques with the existing strategy of directed testing using VHDL bus functional models.
Mike Bartley, Darren Galpin, Tim Blackmore
DAC2