EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew W. B. Trotter
dblp:86/3195
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-3702-915XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 77% Medical and health informatics · 23% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | DECO: decompose heterogeneous population cohorts for patient stratification and discovery of sample biomarkers using omic data profiling · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
omics data analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | DECO: decompose heterogeneous population cohorts for patient stratification and discovery of sample biomarkers using omic data profiling · Bioinform. 2019 |
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
patient stratification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | DECO: decompose heterogeneous population cohorts for patient stratification and discovery of sample biomarkers using omic data profiling · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein-protein interaction prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Co-complex protein membership evaluation using Maximum Entropy on GO ontology and InterPro annotation · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
functional annotation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Co-complex protein membership evaluation using Maximum Entropy on GO ontology and InterPro annotation · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
gene ontology annotation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Co-complex protein membership evaluation using Maximum Entropy on GO ontology and InterPro annotation · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
differential analysis · 0.4correspondence analysis · 0.4support vector machine · 0.3maximum entropy · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | DECO: decompose heterogeneous population cohorts for patient stratification and discovery of sample biomarkers using omic data profilingabstractMOTIVATION: Patient and sample diversity is one of the main challenges when dealing with clinical cohorts in biomedical genomics studies. During last decade, several methods have been developed to identify biomarkers assigned to specific individuals or subtypes of samples. However, current methods still fail to discover markers in complex scenarios where heterogeneity or hidden phenotypical factors are present. Here, we propose a method to analyze and understand heterogeneous data avoiding classical normalization approaches of reducing or removing variation. RESULTS: DEcomposing heterogeneous Cohorts using Omic data profiling (DECO) is a method to find significant association among biological features (biomarkers) and samples (individuals) analyzing large-scale omic data. The method identifies and categorizes biomarkers of specific phenotypic conditions based on a recurrent differential analysis integrated with a non-symmetrical correspondence analysis. DECO integrates both omic data dispersion and predictor-response relationship from non-symmetrical correspondence analysis in a unique statistic (called h-statistic), allowing the identification of closely related sample categories within complex cohorts. The performance is demonstrated using simulated data and five experimental transcriptomic datasets, and comparing to seven other methods. We show DECO greatly enhances the discovery and subtle identification of biomarkers, making it especially suited for deep and accurate patient stratification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DECO is freely available as an R package (including a practical vignette) at Bioconductor repository (http://bioconductor.org/packages/deco/). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Francisco J. Campos-Laborie, Alberto Risueño, M. Ortiz-Estévez, B. Rosón-Burgo, Conrad Droste, Celia Fontanillo, Remco Loos, Jose Manuel Sánchez-Santos, Matthew W. B. Trotter, Javier De Las Rivas |
Bioinform. | 9 |
| 2018 | Co-complex protein membership evaluation using Maximum Entropy on GO ontology and InterPro annotationabstractMotivation: Protein-protein interactions (PPI) play a crucial role in our understanding of protein function and biological processes. The standardization and recording of experimental findings is increasingly stored in ontologies, with the Gene Ontology (GO) being one of the most successful projects. Several PPI evaluation algorithms have been based on the application of probabilistic frameworks or machine learning algorithms to GO properties. Here, we introduce a new training set design and machine learning based approach that combines dependent heterogeneous protein annotations from the entire ontology to evaluate putative co-complex protein interactions determined by empirical studies. Results: PPI annotations are built combinatorically using corresponding GO terms and InterPro annotation. We use a S.cerevisiae high-confidence complex dataset as a positive training set. A series of classifiers based on Maximum Entropy and support vector machines (SVMs), each with a composite counterpart algorithm, are trained on a series of training sets. These achieve a high performance area under the ROC curve of ≤0.97, outperforming go2ppi-a previously established prediction tool for protein-protein interactions (PPI) based on Gene Ontology (GO) annotations. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/ima23/maxent-ppi. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Irina M. Armean, Kathryn S. Lilley, Matthew W. B. Trotter, Nicholas Charles Victor Pilkington, Sean B. Holden |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2016 | Learning from Heterogeneous Data Sources: An Application in Spatial ProteomicsabstractSub-cellular localisation of proteins is an essential post-translational regulatory mechanism that can be assayed using high-throughput mass spectrometry (MS). These MS-based spatial proteomics experiments enable us to pinpoint the sub-cellular distribution of thousands of proteins in a specific system under controlled conditions. Recent advances in high-throughput MS methods have yielded a plethora of experimental spatial proteomics data for the cell biology community. Yet, there are many third-party data sources, such as immunofluorescence microscopy or protein annotations and sequences, which represent a rich and vast source of complementary information. We present a unique transfer learning classification framework that utilises a nearest-neighbour or support vector machine system, to integrate heterogeneous data sources to considerably improve on the quantity and quality of sub-cellular protein assignment. We demonstrate the utility of our algorithms through evaluation of five experimental datasets, from four different species in conjunction with four different auxiliary data sources to classify proteins to tens of sub-cellular compartments with high generalisation accuracy. We further apply the method to an experiment on pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells to classify a set of previously unknown proteins, and validate our findings against a recent high resolution map of the mouse stem cell proteome. The methodology is distributed as part of the open-source Bioconductor pRoloc suite for spatial proteomics data analysis. Lisa M. Breckels, Sean B. Holden, David Wojnar, Claire M. Mulvey, Andy Christoforou, Arnoud Groen, Matthew W. B. Trotter, Oliver Kohlbacher, Kathryn S. Lilley, Laurent Gatto |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 7 |