Rajeev Verma

dblp:86/3322 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-9830-2069ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Memory systems · 89% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 9% Embedded and real-time systems · 2%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 43% Multi-agent systems · 43% Information extraction and text analysis · 14%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
memory management
1.012026
S-Tiering: A Unified HW/SW Solution for Memory Tiering Based on the Standard CXL Hotness Monitoring Unit · IEEE Trans. Computers 2026
Memory systems › virtual memory management
page migration
1.012026
S-Tiering: A Unified HW/SW Solution for Memory Tiering Based on the Standard CXL Hotness Monitoring Unit · IEEE Trans. Computers 2026
Memory systems
tiered memory
1.012026
S-Tiering: A Unified HW/SW Solution for Memory Tiering Based on the Standard CXL Hotness Monitoring Unit · IEEE Trans. Computers 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration
0.612022
Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifiers · ICML 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › human-agent interaction › human-AI decision making
human-AI complementarity
0.612022
Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifiers · ICML 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › human-agent interaction › human-AI decision making
learning to defer
0.612022
Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifiers · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.612022
Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifiers · ICML 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.412019
DeepSentiPeer: Harnessing Sentiment in Review Texts to Recommend Peer Review Decisions · ACL (1) 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › pairing-based cryptography
barreto-naehrig curves
0.312017
Fast Software Implementations of Bilinear Pairings · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
pairing-based cryptography
0.312017
Fast Software Implementations of Bilinear Pairings · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › pairing-based cryptography
pairing computation
0.312017
Fast Software Implementations of Bilinear Pairings · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › elliptic curve cryptography
pairing-friendly curves
0.312017
Fast Software Implementations of Bilinear Pairings · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-channel architecture · 1.1deep neural network · 1.1probabilistic data structure · 1.0count-min sketch · 1.0tower field arithmetic · 0.6one-vs-all classifier · 0.6miller's algorithm optimization · 0.6lazy reduction · 0.6consistent surrogate loss · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 S-Tiering: A Unified HW/SW Solution for Memory Tiering Based on the Standard CXL Hotness Monitoring Unit
abstract
In this paper, we proposeS-Tiering, a unified hardware and software solution for memory tiering based on the standard CXL Hotness Monitoring Unit (CHMU).S-Tieringconsists of hardware components that comply with CHMU hardware specification defined in the CXL 3.2 Specification, and software components that control hardware components. Based on these components,S-Tieringminimizes the access to CXL memory by properly steering page migration.We evaluate various probabilistic data structure algorithms and adopt a Count-Min Sketch-based Hot Page Tracker that achieves 99% accuracy with only 0.3% tracking buffer overhead compared to assigning a dedicated counter for every 4KB page. We implement hardware components ofS-Tieringon an Field-Programmable Gate Array board and software components ofS-Tieringon Ubuntu 22.04 with Linux-v6.8 kernel. We evaluate the performance impact ofS-Tieringon benchmarks representative of real applications (e.g., High Performance Computing, Graph-processing, In-Memory Database).S-Tieringachieves a performance improvement of up to 193% compared to first-touch allocation and outperforms AutoNUMA memory tiering by 184%p.S-Tieringminimizes the memory access to CXL memory and increases the bandwidth utilization of DDR memory up to ×11.
Seunghak Lee, Wonjae Lee 0001, Hojin Nam, Jehoon Park, Youngshin Park, Junhyeok Im, Jinin So, Raghu Vamsi Krishna Talanki, Praful Ramesh O, Rajeev Verma, Taeksang Song, Wonhwa Shin, Sangjoon Hwang 0001
IEEE Trans. Computers11
2025 A Structured Survey of Anomaly Types and Classification-Based Detection Models in IoT
Atefeh Gilvari, Ziad Kobti, Narayan C. Kar, Nasrin Tavakoli, Rajeev Verma
IJCCI (3)5
2025 On Continuous Monitoring of Risk Violations under Unknown Shift
abstract
Machine learning systems deployed in the real world must operate under dynamic and often unpredictable distribution shifts. This challenges the validity of statistical safety assurances on the system’s risk established beforehand. Common risk control frameworks rely on fixed assumptions and lack mechanisms to continuously monitor deployment reliability. In this work, we propose a general framework for the real-time monitoring of risk violations in evolving data streams. Leveraging the ‘testing by betting’ paradigm, we propose a sequential hypothesis testing procedure to detect violations of bounded risks associated with the model’s decision-making mechanism, while ensuring control on the false alarm rate. Our method operates under minimal assumptions on the nature of encountered shifts, rendering it broadly applicable. We illustrate the effectiveness of our approach by monitoring risks in outlier detection and set prediction under a variety of shifts.
Alexander Timans, Rajeev Verma, Eric T. Nalisnick, Christian A. Naesseth
UAI2
2024 Learning to Defer to a Population: A Meta-Learning Approach
abstract
The learning to defer (L2D) framework allows autonomous systems to be safe and robust by allocating difficult decisions to a human expert. All existing work on L2D assumes that each expert is well-identified, and if any expert were to change, the system should be re-trained. In this work, we alleviate this constraint, formulating an L2D system that can cope with never-before-seen experts at test-time. We accomplish this by using meta-learning, considering both optimization- and model-based variants. Given a small context set to characterize the currently available expert, our framework can quickly adapt its deferral policy. For the model-based approach, we employ an attention mechanism that is able to look for points in the context set that are similar to a given test point, leading to an even more precise assessment of the expert’s abilities. In the experiments, we validate our methods on image recognition, traffic sign detection, and skin lesion diagnosis benchmarks.
Dharmesh Tailor, Aditya Patra, Rajeev Verma, Putra Manggala, Eric T. Nalisnick
AISTATS3
2023 Learning to Defer to Multiple Experts: Consistent Surrogate Losses, Confidence Calibration, and Conformal Ensembles
abstract
We study the statistical properties of learning to defer (L2D) to multiple experts. In particular, we address the open problems of deriving a consistent surrogate loss, confidence calibration, and principled ensembling of experts. Firstly, we derive two consistent surrogates—one based on a softmax parameterization, the other on a one-vs-all (OvA) parameterization—that are analogous to the single expert losses proposed by Mozannar and Sontag (2020) and Verma and Nalisnick (2022), respectively. We then study the frameworks’ ability to estimate $P( m_j = y | x )$, the probability that the $j$th expert will correctly predict the label for $x$. Theory shows the softmax-based loss causes mis-calibration to propagate between the estimates while the OvA-based loss does not (though in practice, we find there are trade offs). Lastly, we propose a conformal inference technique that chooses a subset of experts to query when the system defers. We perform empirical validation on tasks for galaxy, skin lesion, and hate speech classification.
Rajeev Verma, Daniel Barrejón, Eric T. Nalisnick
AISTATS1
2022 Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifiers
abstract
The learning to defer (L2D) framework has the potential to make AI systems safer. For a given input, the system can defer the decision to a human if the human is more likely than the model to take the correct action. We study the calibration of L2D systems, investigating if the probabilities they output are sound. We find that Mozannar & Sontag’s (2020) multiclass framework is not calibrated with respect to expert correctness. Moreover, it is not even guaranteed to produce valid probabilities due to its parameterization being degenerate for this purpose. We propose an L2D system based on one-vs-all classifiers that is able to produce calibrated probabilities of expert correctness. Furthermore, our loss function is also a consistent surrogate for multiclass L2D, like Mozannar & Sontag’s (2020). Our experiments verify that not only is our system calibrated, but this benefit comes at no cost to accuracy. Our model’s accuracy is always comparable (and often superior) to Mozannar & Sontag’s (2020) model’s in tasks ranging from hate speech detection to galaxy classification to diagnosis of skin lesions.
Rajeev Verma, Eric T. Nalisnick
ICML1
2021 Attend to Your Review: A Deep Neural Network to Extract Aspects from Peer Reviews
Rajeev Verma, Kartik Shinde, Hardik Arora, Tirthankar Ghosal
ICONIP (6)1
2019 DeepSentiPeer: Harnessing Sentiment in Review Texts to Recommend Peer Review Decisions
abstract
Automatically validating a research artefact is one of the frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (AI) that directly brings it close to competing with human intellect and intuition.Although criticized sometimes, the existing peer review system still stands as the benchmark of research validation.The present-day peer review process is not straightforward and demands profound domain knowledge, expertise, and intelligence of human reviewer(s), which is somewhat elusive with the current state of AI.However, the peer review texts, which contains rich sentiment information of the reviewer, reflecting his/her overall attitude towards the research in the paper, could be a valuable entity to predict the acceptance or rejection of the manuscript under consideration.Here in this work, we investigate the role of reviewers sentiments embedded within peer review texts to predict the peer review outcome.Our proposed deep neural architecture takes into account three channels of information: the paper, the corresponding reviews, and the review polarity to predict the overall recommendation score as well as the final decision.We achieve significant performance improvement over the baselines (∼ 29% error reduction) proposed in a recently released dataset of peer reviews.An AI of this kind could assist the editors/program chairs as an additional layer of confidence in the final decision making, especially when non-responding/missing reviewers are frequent in present day peer review.
Tirthankar Ghosal, Rajeev Verma, Asif Ekbal, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
ACL (1)2
2017 Fast Software Implementations of Bilinear Pairings
abstract
Advancement in pairing-based protocols has had a major impact on the applicability of cryptography to the solution of more complex real-world problems. However, the computation of pairings in software still needs to be optimized for different platforms including emerging embedded systems and high-performance PCs. Few works in the literature have considered implementations of pairings on the former applications despite their growing importance in a post-PC world. In this paper, we investigate the efficient computation of the Optimal-Ate pairing over special class of pairing friendly Barreto-Naehrig curves in software at different security levels. We target both applications and perform our implementations on ARM-powered processors (with and without NEON instructions) and PC processors. We exploit state-of-the-art techniques and propose new optimizations to speed up the computation in the different levels including tower field and curve arithmetic. In particular, we extend the concept of lazy reduction to inversion in extension fields, analyze an efficient alternative for the sparse multiplication used inside the Miller’s algorithm and reduce further the cost of point/line evaluation formulas in affine and projective homogeneous coordinates. In addition, we study the efficiency of using M-type and D-type sextic twists in the pairing computation and carry out a detailed comparison between affine, Jacobian, and homogeneous coordinate systems. Our implementations on various mass-market emerging embedded devices significantly improve the state-of-the-art of pairing computation on ARM-powered devices and x86-64 PC platforms. For ARM implementations we achieved considerably faster computations in comparison to the counterparts.
Reza Azarderakhsh, Dieter Fishbein, Gurleen Grewal, Shi Hu, David Jao, Patrick Longa, Rajeev Verma
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.7