Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arati S. Deo

dblp:86/3391 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 55% Robot manipulation · 43% Robot navigation and mapping · 2%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
inverse kinematics
0.021997
Minimum effort inverse kinematics for redundant manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997
Robot subtask performance with singularity robustness using optimal damped least-squares · ICRA 1992
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimal control
minimum effort control
0.011997
Minimum effort inverse kinematics for redundant manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › inverse kinematics
redundant manipulator inverse kinematics
0.011997
Minimum effort inverse kinematics for redundant manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.011997
Minimum effort inverse kinematics for redundant manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997
Robotics › Robot manipulation
cooperative manipulation
0.011995
Dynamics and Control Methods for Cooperating Manipulatros with Rolling Contacts · ICRA 1995
Robotics › Robot manipulation › cooperative manipulation
multi-arm manipulation
0.011995
Dynamics and Control Methods for Cooperating Manipulatros with Rolling Contacts · ICRA 1995
Robotics › Robot manipulation › nonprehensile manipulation
rolling contact manipulation
0.011995
Dynamics and Control Methods for Cooperating Manipulatros with Rolling Contacts · ICRA 1995
Robotics › Robot manipulation
redundant manipulator
0.011992
Robot subtask performance with singularity robustness using optimal damped least-squares · ICRA 1992
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
obstacle avoidance
0.011992
Robot subtask performance with singularity robustness using optimal damped least-squares · ICRA 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

infinity norm optimization · 0.0euclidean norm comparison · 0.0dynamic modeling · 0.0backstepping control · 0.0singularity-robust inverse · 0.0damped least squares · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Minimum effort inverse kinematics for redundant manipulators
abstract
This paper investigates the use of an infinity norm in formulating the optimization measures for computing the inverse kinematics of redundant arms. The infinity norm of a vector is its maximum absolute value component and hence its minimization implies the determination of a minimum effort solution as opposed to the minimum-energy criterion associated with the Euclidean norm. In applications where individual magnitudes of the vector components are of concern, this norm represents the physical requirements more closely than does the Euclidean norm. We first study the minimization of the infinity-norm of the joint velocity vector itself, and discuss its physical interpretation. Next, a new method of optimizing a subtask criterion, defined using the infinity-norm, to perform additional tasks such as obstacle avoidance or joint limit avoidance is introduced. Simulations illustrating these methods and comparing the results with the Euclidean norm solutions are presented.
Arati S. Deo, Ian D. Walker
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.1
1995 Dynamics and Control Methods for Cooperating Manipulatros with Rolling Contacts
abstract
In this paper, the authors present a new control algorithm for multiple cooperating mechanisms manipulating a common object, with rolling contact between the end-effectors and the object. The algorithm is based on a new dynamic formulation, in which the rolling degrees of freedom between the end-effector and the object are modeled as one or more unactuated joints of the manipulator. Such an augmentation of the rolling contacts imparts each manipulator with additional degrees of freedom and could also make it kinematically redundant. This can be exploited for the satisfaction of a secondary subtask criterion such as collision avoidance. In addition, a control law can be specified that enables simultaneous control of the object trajectory, the internal forces in the object and the trajectories of the contact points on the object or the end-effecters.
Arati S. Deo, Ian D. Walker
ICRA1
1992 Robot subtask performance with singularity robustness using optimal damped least-squares
abstract
The authors introduce a novel formulation of subtask performance for redundant manipulators. This formulation uses the singularity robust inverse (SRI), which is effective in yielding feasible joint motions in single regions, in conjunction with a homogeneous-like joint velocity component to perform an additional subtask such as obstacle avoidance. This novel inverse kinematic scheme enables the manipulator to overcome singularities (or, more accurately, avoid infeasible joint motions at or near singular configurations) and avoid obstacles in addition to the main motion task. The attractive aspect of this scheme is that it results in the satisfaction of two subtasks without requiring two explicit subtask criteria. This is because one of the subtasks, i.e., feasible joint motion, is implicitly incorporated in the particular solution in the form of the SRI. As depicted in simulations, the proposed formulation proves to be an effective inverse kinematic solution in singular regions of the manipulator workspace.>
Arati S. Deo, Ian D. Walker
ICRA1