Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter R. Harvey

dblp:86/464 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization › intermediate representation
static single assignment form
0.011983
Analyzing Software Safety · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time embedded systems
safety-critical real-time systems
0.011983
Analyzing Software Safety · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fault tree analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 Software fault tree analysis
Nancy G. Leveson, Peter R. Harvey
J. Syst. Softw.2
1983 Analyzing Software Safety
abstract
With the increased use of software controls in critical realtime applications, a new dimension has been introduced into software reliability–the "cost" of errors. The problems of safety have become critical as these applcations have increasingly included areas where the consequences of failure are serious and may involve grave dangers to human life and property. This paper defines software safety and describes a technique called software fault tree analysis which can be used to analyze a design as to its safety. The technique has been applied to a program which controls the flight and telemetry for a University of California spacecraft. A critical failure scenario was detected by the technique which had not been revealed during substantial testing of the program. Parts of this analysis are presented as an example of the use of the technique and the results are discussed.
Nancy G. Leveson, Peter R. Harvey
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2