Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elizabeth Guruceaga

dblp:86/4888 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-0547-681XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.922020
DeepMSPeptide: peptide detectability prediction using deep learning · Bioinform. 2020
MiTPeptideDB: a proteogenomic resource for the discovery of novel peptides · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry proteomics
0.412020
MiTPeptideDB: a proteogenomic resource for the discovery of novel peptides · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › proteogenomics
novel peptide identification
0.412020
MiTPeptideDB: a proteogenomic resource for the discovery of novel peptides · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
proteogenomics
0.412020
MiTPeptideDB: a proteogenomic resource for the discovery of novel peptides · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › computational proteomics
proteotypic peptide prediction
0.412020
DeepMSPeptide: peptide detectability prediction using deep learning · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
transcriptome assembly
0.112020
MiTPeptideDB: a proteogenomic resource for the discovery of novel peptides · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

shotgun proteomics · 0.4peptide detectability filter · 0.4deep learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 MiTPeptideDB: a proteogenomic resource for the discovery of novel peptides
abstract
MOTIVATION: The principal lines of research in MS/MS based Proteomics have been directed toward the molecular characterization of the proteins including their biological functions and their implications in human diseases. Recent advances in this field have also allowed the first attempts to apply these techniques to the clinical practice. Nowadays, the main progress in Computational Proteomics is based on the integration of genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic experimental data, what is known as Proteogenomics. This methodology is being especially useful for the discovery of new clinical biomarkers, small open reading frames and microproteins, although their validation is still challenging. RESULTS: We detected novel peptides following a proteogenomic workflow based on the MiTranscriptome human assembly and shotgun experiments. The annotation approach generated three custom databases with the corresponding peptides of known and novel transcripts of both protein coding genes and non-coding genes. In addition, we used a peptide detectability filter to improve the computational performance of the proteomic searches, the statistical analysis and the robustness of the results. These innovative additional filters are specially relevant when noisy next generation sequencing experiments are used to generate the databases. This resource, MiTPeptideDB, was validated using 43 cell lines for which RNA-Seq experiments and shotgun experiments were available. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MiTPeptideDB is available at http://bit.ly/MiTPeptideDB. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Elizabeth Guruceaga, Alba Garín-Muga, Victor Segura
Bioinform.1
2020 DeepMSPeptide: peptide detectability prediction using deep learning
abstract
SUMMARY: The protein detection and quantification using high-throughput proteomic technologies is still challenging due to the stochastic nature of the peptide selection in the mass spectrometer, the difficulties in the statistical analysis of the results and the presence of degenerated peptides. However, considering in the analysis only those peptides that could be detected by mass spectrometry, also called proteotypic peptides, increases the accuracy of the results. Several approaches have been applied to predict peptide detectability based on the physicochemical properties of the peptides. In this manuscript, we present DeepMSPeptide, a bioinformatic tool that uses a deep learning method to predict proteotypic peptides exclusively based on the peptide amino acid sequences. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DeepMSPeptide is available at https://github.com/vsegurar/DeepMSPeptide. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Guillermo Serrano, Elizabeth Guruceaga, Victor Segura
Bioinform.2
2005 Correlation between Gene Expression and GO Semantic Similarity
abstract
This research analyzes some aspects of the relationship between gene expression, gene function, and gene annotation. Many recent studies are implicitly based on the assumption that gene products that are biologically and functionally related would maintain this similarity both in their expression profiles as well as in their Gene Ontology (GO) annotation. We analyze how accurate this assumption proves to be using real publicly available data. We also aim to validate a measure of semantic similarity for GO annotation. We use the Pearson correlation coefficient and its absolute value as a measure of similarity between expression profiles of gene products. We explore a number of semantic similarity measures (Resnik, Jiang, and Lin) and compute the similarity between gene products annotated using the GO. Finally, we compute correlation coefficients to compare gene expression similarity against GO semantic similarity. Our results suggest that the Resnik similarity measure outperforms the others and seems better suited for use in Gene Ontology. We also deduce that there seems to be correlation between semantic similarity in the GO annotation and gene expression for the three GO ontologies. We show that this correlation is negligible up to a certain semantic similarity value; then, for higher similarity values, the relationship trend becomes almost linear. These results can be used to augment the knowledge provided by clustering algorithms and in the development of bioinformatic tools for finding and characterizing gene products.
José L. Sevilla Campo, Victor Segura, Adam Podhorski, Elizabeth Guruceaga, José M. Mato, Luis A. Martínez-Cruz, Fernando J. Corrales, Angel Rubio
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.4