Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kathleen O'Sullivan
dblp:86/536
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
array CGH segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis · Bioinform. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterative weighted least-squares · 0.1heavy-tailed random-effect model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysisabstractMOTIVATION: Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) provides a genome-wide technique to screen for copy number alteration. The existing segmentation approaches for analyzing aCGH data are based on modeling data as a series of discrete segments with unknown boundaries and unknown heights. Although the biological process of copy number alteration is discrete, in reality a variety of biological and experimental factors can cause the signal to deviate from a stepwise function. To take this into account, we propose a smooth segmentation (smoothseg) approach. METHODS: To achieve a robust segmentation, we use a doubly heavy-tailed random-effect model. The first heavy-tailed structure on the errors deals with outliers in the observations, and the second deals with possible jumps in the underlying pattern associated with different segments. We develop a fast and reliable computational procedure based on the iterative weighted least-squares algorithm with band-limited matrix inversion. RESULTS: Using simulated and real data sets, we demonstrate how smoothseg can aid in identification of regions with genomic alteration and in classification of samples. For the real data sets, smoothseg leads to smaller false discovery rate and classification error rate than the circular binary segmentation (CBS) algorithm. In a realistic simulation setting, smoothseg is better than wavelet smoothing and CBS in identification of regions with genomic alterations and better than CBS in classification of samples. For comparative analyses, we demonstrate that segmenting the t-statistics performs better than segmenting the data. AVAILABILITY: The R package smoothseg to perform smooth segmentation is available from http://www.meb.ki.se/~yudpaw. Jian Huang 0005, Arief Gusnanto, Kathleen O'Sullivan, Johan Staaf, Åke Borg, Yudi Pawitan |
Bioinform. | 3 |