EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aditya Ganjam
dblp:86/6881
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0009-0004-5694-3953ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 6 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
6 papers |
Content delivery and video streaming · 77% Internet architecture and protocols · 10% Software-defined and programmable networks · 5% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Distributed systems · 57% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 43% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Content delivery and video streaming
overlay multicast |
0.2 | 4 | 2007 | SAAR: A Shared Control Plane for Overlay Multicast · NSDI 2007 Internet Multicast Video Delivery · Proc. IEEE 2005 Early Experience with an Internet Broadcast System Based on Overlay Multicast · USENIX ATC, General Track 2004 |
Content delivery and video streaming › quality of experience
video quality optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | C3: Internet-Scale Control Plane for Video Quality Optimization · NSDI 2015 |
Content delivery and video streaming
quality of experience |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement · SIGCOMM 2011 |
Content delivery and video streaming › quality of experience
video quality |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement · SIGCOMM 2011 |
Software-defined and programmable networks
control plane |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | C3: Internet-Scale Control Plane for Video Quality Optimization · NSDI 2015 |
Internet architecture and protocols
multicast |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Internet Multicast Video Delivery · Proc. IEEE 2005 |
Routing and switching
multicast routing |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Internet Multicast Video Delivery · Proc. IEEE 2005 |
Internet architecture and protocols
quality of service |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Internet Multicast Video Delivery · Proc. IEEE 2005 |
Content delivery and video streaming
video multicast |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Internet Multicast Video Delivery · Proc. IEEE 2005 |
Content delivery and video streaming
live streaming |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The feasibility of supporting large-scale live streaming applications with dynamic application end-points · SIGCOMM 2004 |
Content delivery and video streaming › peer-assisted content distribution
peer-assisted streaming |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The feasibility of supporting large-scale live streaming applications with dynamic application end-points · SIGCOMM 2004 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
multicast |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | SAAR: A Shared Control Plane for Overlay Multicast · NSDI 2007 |
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
overlay construction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The feasibility of supporting large-scale live streaming applications with dynamic application end-points · SIGCOMM 2004 |
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
overlay networks |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Early Experience with an Internet Broadcast System Based on Overlay Multicast · USENIX ATC, General Track 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical analysis · 0.1trace analysis · 0.1overlay multicast · 0.1overlay design alternatives evaluation · 0.1qos mechanisms · 0.1overlay routing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | C3: Internet-Scale Control Plane for Video Quality Optimization
Aditya Ganjam, Faisal Siddiqui, Jibin Zhan, Ion Stoica, Junchen Jiang, Vyas Sekar, Hui Zhang 0001 |
NSDI | 1 |
| 2011 | Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagementabstractAs the distribution of the video over the Internet becomes main- stream and its consumption moves from the computer to the TV screen, user expectation for high quality is constantly increasing. In this context, it is crucial for content providers to understand if and how video quality affects user engagement and how to best invest their resources to optimize video quality. This paper is a first step towards addressing these questions. We use a unique dataset that spans different content types, including short video on demand (VoD), long VoD, and live content from popular video con- tent providers. Using client-side instrumentation, we measure quality metrics such as the join time, buffering ratio, average bitrate, rendering quality, and rate of buffering events. Florin Dobrian, Vyas Sekar, Asad Awan, Ion Stoica, Dilip Antony Joseph, Aditya Ganjam, Jibin Zhan, Hui Zhang 0001 |
SIGCOMM | 6 |
| 2010 | On-demand waypoints for live P2P video broadcasting
Aditya Ganjam, Sanjay G. Rao, Kunwadee Sripanidkulchai, Jibin Zhan, Hui Zhang 0001 |
Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. | 1 |
| 2007 | SAAR: A Shared Control Plane for Overlay Multicast
Animesh Nandi, Aditya Ganjam, Peter Druschel, T. S. Eugene Ng, Ion Stoica, Hui Zhang 0001, Bobby Bhattacharjee |
NSDI | 2 |
| 2005 | Internet Multicast Video DeliveryabstractInternet video delivery has been motivating research in multicast routing, quality of service (QoS), and the service model of the Internet itself for the last 15 years. Multicast delivery has the potential to deliver a large amount of content that currently cannot be delivered through broadcast. IP and overlay multicast are two architectures proposed to provide multicast support. A large body of research has been done with IP multicast and QoS mechanisms for IP multicast since the late 1980s. In the past five years, overlay multicast research has gained momentum with a vision to accomplish ubiquitous multicast delivery that is efficient and scales in the dimensions of the number of groups, number of receivers, and number of senders. This work presents an overview of the issues facing both IP and overlay multicast and the approaches that researchers are taking to solve them. Many of these approaches take advantage of a rich interface, beyond a single rate video stream, between the coding and delivery mechanisms. The semantics of this interface is an important question for future research and we discuss this with insight from experience on delivery technologies. Aditya Ganjam, Hui Zhang 0001 |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |
| 2004 | Connectivity restrictions in overlay multicastabstractA large number of overlay multicast protocols have been developed, almost all of which assume universal connectivity between end hosts. However, in reality, this assumption is not valid with widespread use of Network Address Translators (NAT) and firewalls. The impact of NAT and firewall connectivity restrictions on overlay multicast, es-pecially in the application-endpoint setting, has not been seriously considered. In this paper, we argue that it is critical to consider con-nectivity restrictions because NAT and firewall hosts make up a large fraction of the endpoints, affecting proper functionality as well as performance of overlay multicast protocols. We present several de-sign enhancements that explicitly consider connectivity restrictions in overlay multicast and evaluate the design space and tradeoffs based on real Internet broadcasts and Internet testbed experiments. Aditya Ganjam, Hui Zhang 0001 |
NOSSDAV | 1 |
| 2004 | The feasibility of supporting large-scale live streaming applications with dynamic application end-pointsabstractWhile application end-point architectures have proven to be viable solutions for large-scale distributed applications such as distributed computing and file-sharing, there is little known about its feasibility for more bandwidth-demanding applications such as live streaming. Heterogeneity in bandwidth resources and dynamic group membership, inherent properties of application end-points, may adversely affect the construction of a usable and efficient overlay. At large scales, the problems become even more challenging. In this paper, we study one of the most prominent architectural issues in overlay multicast: the feasibility of supporting large-scale groups using an application end-point architecture. We look at three key requirements for feasibility: (i) are there enough resources to construct an overlay, (ii) can a stable and connected overlay be maintained in the presence of group dynamics, and (iii) can an efficient overlay be constructed? Using traces from a large content delivery network, we characterize the behavior of users watching live audio and video streams. We show that in many common real-world scenarios, all three requirements are satisfied. In addition, we evaluate the performance of several design alternatives and show that simple algorithms have the potential to meet these requirements in practice. Overall, our results argue for the feasibility of supporting large-scale live streaming using an application end-point architecture. Kunwadee Sripanidkulchai, Aditya Ganjam, Bruce M. Maggs, Hui Zhang 0001 |
SIGCOMM | 2 |
| 2004 | Early Experience with an Internet Broadcast System Based on Overlay Multicast
Yang-Hua Chu, Aditya Ganjam, T. S. Eugene Ng, Sanjay G. Rao, Kunwadee Sripanidkulchai, Jibin Zhan, Hui Zhang 0001 |
USENIX ATC, General Track | 2 |