Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anuraag Agrawal
dblp:86/7734
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 39% 3D vision · 30% Image recognition and object detection · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › probabilistic segmentation
markov random field segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | MMM-classification of 3D range data · ICRA 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | MMM-classification of 3D range data · ICRA 2009 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | MMM-classification of 3D range data · ICRA 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › scene understanding
outdoor scene understanding |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | MMM-classification of 3D range data · ICRA 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polygon reconstruction · 0.1object feature distribution · 0.1markov random field · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Large-scale 3D scene modeling by registration of laser range data with Google Maps imagesabstractThis work presents a novel approach to registering multiple range images on top of a Google Maps image. The fundamental concept behind the method is matching completely different types of input with each other using classification as a middleman. Range images and Google Maps images are separated into classes, and the range image is also projected into a 2D top-down template image. The template image can then be matched against the Google Maps image to find its location and orientation on the map, which can be used for registering the range images. An experiment comparing this technique against using GPS to find position and orientation showed that it is effective at automatically constructing a reasonable large-scale 3D model whereas GPS would be completely ineffective. Anuraag Agrawal, Miki Matsumura, Atsushi Nakazawa, Haruo Takemura |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2009 | MMM-classification of 3D range dataabstractThis paper presents a method for accurately segmenting and classifying 3D range data into particular object classes. Object classification of input images is necessary for applications including robot navigation and automation, in particular with respect to path planning. To achieve robust object classification, we propose the idea of an object feature which represents a distribution of neighboring points around a target point. In addition, rather than processing raw points, we reconstruct polygons from the point data, introducing connectivity to the points. With these ideas, we can refine the Markov Random Field (MRF) calculation with more relevant information with regards to determining ldquorelated pointsrdquo. The algorithm was tested against five outdoor scenes and provided accurate classification even in the presence of many classes of interest. Anuraag Agrawal, Atsushi Nakazawa, Haruo Takemura |
ICRA | 1 |