EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Juozas Gordevicius
dblp:86/885
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Spatial and temporal data management · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics › functional enrichment analysis
pathway enrichment analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | aPEAR: an R package for autonomous visualization of pathway enrichment networks · Bioinform. 2023 |
Visualization and visual analytics › biological data visualization
biological network visualization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | aPEAR: an R package for autonomous visualization of pathway enrichment networks · Bioinform. 2023 |
Spatial and temporal data management › temporal databases
temporal aggregation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Parsimonious temporal aggregation · VLDB J. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
network clustering · 1.3gene set similarity · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | aPEAR: an R package for autonomous visualization of pathway enrichment networksabstractSUMMARY: The interpretation of pathway enrichment analysis results is frequently complicated by an overwhelming and redundant list of significantly affected pathways. Here, we present an R package aPEAR (Advanced Pathway Enrichment Analysis Representation) which leverages similarities between the pathway gene sets and represents them as a network of interconnected clusters. Each cluster is assigned a meaningful name that highlights the main biological themes in the experiment. Our approach enables an automated and objective overview of the data without manual and time-consuming parameter tweaking. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The package aPEAR is implemented in R, published under the MIT open-source licence. The source code, documentation, and usage instructions are available on https://gitlab.com/vugene/aPEAR as well as on CRAN (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=aPEAR). Ieva Kerseviciute, Juozas Gordevicius |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2012 | Clustering Visually Similar Web Page Elements for Structured Web Data Extraction
Tomas Grigalis, Lukas Radvilavicius, Antanas Cenys, Juozas Gordevicius |
ICWE | 4 |
| 2012 | Parsimonious temporal aggregation
Juozas Gordevicius, Johann Gamper, Michael H. Böhlen |
VLDB J. | 1 |
| 2010 | Ranking of evolving stories through meta-aggregationabstractIn this paper we focus on the problem of ranking news stories within their historical context by exploiting their content similarity. We observe that news stories evolve and thus have to be ranked in a time and query dependent manner. We do this in two steps. First, the mining step discovers metastories, which constitute meaningful groups of similar stories that occur at arbitrary points in time. Second, the ranking step uses well known measures of content similarity to construct implicit links among all metastories, and uses them to rank those metastories that overlap the time interval provided in a user query. We use real data from conventional and social media sources (weblogs) to study the impact of different meta-aggregation techniques and similarity measures in the final ranking. We evaluate the framework using both objective and subjective criteria, and discuss the selection of clustering method and similarity measure that lead to the best ranking results. Juozas Gordevicius, Francisco J. Estrada, Hyun Chul Lee, Periklis Andritsos, Johann Gamper |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2009 | Parsimonious temporal aggregationabstractTemporal aggregation is a crucial operator in temporal databases and has been studied in various flavors, including instant temporal aggregation (ITA) and span temporal aggregation (STA), each having its strengths and weaknesses. In this paper we define a new temporal aggregation operator, called parsimonious temporal aggregation (PTA), which comprises two main steps: (i) it computes the ITA result over the input relation and (ii) it compresses this intermediate result to a user-specified size c by merging adjacent tuples and keeping the induced total error minimal; the compressed ITA result is returned as the final result. By considering the distribution of the input data and allowing to control the result size, PTA combines the best features of ITA and STA. We provide two evaluation algorithms for PTA queries. First, the oPTA algorithm computes an exact solution, by applying dynamic programming to explore all possibilities to compress the ITA result and selecting the compression with the minimal total error. It runs in O(n2pc) time and O(n2) space, where n is the size of the input relation and p is the number of aggregation functions in the query. Second, the more efficient gPTA algorithm computes an approximate solution by greedily merging the most similar ITA result tuples, which, however, does not guarantee a compression with a minimal total error. gPTA intermingles the two steps of PTA and avoids large intermediate results. The compression step of gPTA runs in O(np log(c + δ)) time and O(c + δ) space, where δ is a small buffer for "look ahead". An empirical evaluation shows good results: considerable reductions of the result size introduce only small errors, and gPTA scales to large data sets and is only slightly worse than the exact solution of PTA. Juozas Gordevicius, Johann Gamper, Michael H. Böhlen |
EDBT | 1 |
| 2008 | A Greedy Approach Towards Parsimonious Temporal AggregationabstractTemporal aggregation is a crucial operator in temporal databases and has been studied in various flavors. In instant temporal aggregation (ITA) the aggregate value at time instant t is computed from the tuples that hold at t. ITA considers the distribution of the input data and works at the smallest time granularity, but the result size depends on the input timestamps and can get twice as large as the input relation. In span temporal aggregation (STA) the user specifies the timestamps over which the aggregates are computed and thus controls the result size. In this paper we introduce a new temporal aggregation operator, called greedy parsimonious temporal aggregation (gPTA), which combines features from ITA and STA. The operator extends and approximates ITA by greedily merging adjacent tuples with similar aggregate values until the number of result tuples is sufficiently small, which can be controlled by the application. Thus, gPTA considers the distribution of the data and allows to control the result size. Our empirical evaluation on real world data shows good results: considerable reductions of the result size introduce small errors only. Juozas Gordevicius, Johann Gamper, Michael H. Böhlen |
TIME | 1 |