Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Strobel 0002

dblp:86/9733-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-3829-0048ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.912025
SHICEDO: single-cell Hi-C data enhancement with reduced over-smoothing · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell genomics
single-cell hi-c data analysis
0.912025
SHICEDO: single-cell Hi-C data enhancement with reduced over-smoothing · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
3d genome organization
0.312025
SHICEDO: single-cell Hi-C data enhancement with reduced over-smoothing · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generative adversarial network · 1.7channel-wise attention · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SHICEDO: single-cell Hi-C data enhancement with reduced over-smoothing
abstract
MOTIVATION: Single-cell Hi-C (scHi-C) technologies have significantly advanced our understanding of the 3D genome organization. However, scHi-C data are often sparse and noisy, leading to substantial computational challenges in downstream analyses. RESULTS: In this study, we introduce SHICEDO, a novel deep-learning model specifically designed to enhance scHi-C contact matrices by imputing missing or sparsely captured chromatin contacts through a generative adversarial framework. SHICEDO leverages the unique structural characteristics of scHi-C matrices to derive customized features that enable effective data enhancement. Additionally, the model incorporates a channel-wise attention mechanism to mitigate the over-smoothing issue commonly associated with scHi-C enhancement methods. Through simulations and real-data applications, we demonstrate that SHICEDO outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior quantitative and qualitative results. Moreover, SHICEDO enhances key structural features in scHi-C data, thus enabling more precise delineation of chromatin structures such as A/B compartments, TAD-like domains, and chromatin loops. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SHICEDO is publicly available at https://github.com/wmalab/SHICEDO.
Jingong Huang, Michael Strobel 0002, Yangyang Hu, Tiantian Ye, Tao Jiang 0001, Wenxiu Ma
Bioinform.3
2025 An evaluation methodology for machine learning-based tandem mass spectra similarity prediction
abstract
BACKGROUND: Untargeted tandem mass spectrometry serves as a scalable solution for the organization of small molecules. One of the most prevalent techniques for analyzing the acquired tandem mass spectrometry data (MS/MS) - called molecular networking - organizes and visualizes putatively structurally related compounds. However, a key bottleneck of this approach is the comparison of MS/MS spectra used to identify nearby structural neighbors. Machine learning (ML) approaches have emerged as a promising technique to predict structural similarity from MS/MS that may surpass the current state-of-the-art algorithmic methods. However, the comparison between these different ML methods remains a challenge because there is a lack of standardization to benchmark, evaluate, and compare MS/MS similarity methods, and there are no methods that address data leakage between training and test data in order to analyze model generalizability. RESULT: In this work, we present the creation of a new evaluation methodology using a train/test split that allows for the evaluation of machine learning models at varying degrees of structural similarity between training and test sets. We also introduce a training and evaluation framework that measures prediction accuracy on domain-inspired annotation and retrieval metrics designed to mirror real-world applications. We further show how two alternative training methods that leverage MS specific insights (e.g., similar instrumentation, collision energy, adduct) affect method performance and demonstrate the orthogonality of the proposed metrics. We especially highlight the role that collision energy plays in prediction errors. Finally, we release a continually updated version of our dataset online along with our data cleaning and splitting pipelines for community use. CONCLUSION: It is our hope that this benchmark will serve as the basis of development for future machine learning approaches in MS/MS similarity and facilitate comparison between models. We anticipate that the introduced set of evaluation metrics allows for a better reflection of practical performance.
Michael Strobel 0002, Alberto Gil-de-la-Fuente, Mohammad Reza Shahneh, Yasin El Abiead, Roman Bushuiev, Anton Bushuiev, Tomás Pluskal, Mingxun Wang 0001
BMC Bioinform.1