Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Monika Rex-Haffner

dblp:86/9778 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112011
vipR: variant identification in pooled DNA using R · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing error modeling
0.112011
vipR: variant identification in pooled DNA using R · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant calling
0.112011
vipR: variant identification in pooled DNA using R · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical hypothesis testing · 0.1skellam distribution · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 vipR: variant identification in pooled DNA using R
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput-sequencing (HTS) technologies are the method of choice for screening the human genome for rare sequence variants causing susceptibility to complex diseases. Unfortunately, preparation of samples for a large number of individuals is still very cost- and labor intensive. Thus, recently, screens for rare sequence variants were carried out in samples of pooled DNA, in which equimolar amounts of DNA from multiple individuals are mixed prior to sequencing with HTS. The resulting sequence data, however, poses a bioinformatics challenge: the discrimination of sequencing errors from real sequence variants present at a low frequency in the DNA pool. RESULTS: Our method vipR uses data from multiple DNA pools in order to compensate for differences in sequencing error rates along the sequenced region. More precisely, instead of aiming at discriminating sequence variants from sequencing errors, vipR identifies sequence positions that exhibit significantly different minor allele frequencies in at least two DNA pools using the Skellam distribution. The performance of vipR was compared with three other models on data from a targeted resequencing study of the TMEM132D locus in 600 individuals distributed over four DNA pools. Performance of the methods was computed on SNPs that were also genotyped individually using a MALDI-TOF technique. On a set of 82 sequence variants, vipR achieved an average sensitivity of 0.80 at an average specificity of 0.92, thus outperforming the reference methods by at least 0.17 in specificity at comparable sensitivity. AVAILABILITY: The code of vipR is freely available via: http://sourceforge.net/projects/htsvipr/ CONTACT: [email protected].
André Altmann, Peter Weber, Carina Quast, Monika Rex-Haffner, Elisabeth B. Binder, Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bioinform.4