Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Muni Venkateswarlu K.
dblp:87/11139 · also Muni Venkateswarlu Kumaramangalam
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6752-6582ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 100% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | Self-Stabilizing Secure Computation · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2022 Brief Announcement: Secure Self-Stabilizing Computation · PODC 2017 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
self-stabilization |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | Self-Stabilizing Secure Computation · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2022 Brief Announcement: Secure Self-Stabilizing Computation · PODC 2017 |
Distributed systems
secure computation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Self-Stabilizing Secure Computation · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2022 |
Distributed systems
distributed coordination and fault tolerance |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Brief Announcement: Secure Self-Stabilizing Computation · PODC 2017 |
Distributed computing theory
fault tolerance |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Self-Stabilizing Secure Computation · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
finite state machine · 0.6byzantine fault tolerance · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Distributed and Verifiable Digital Badges
Raphaël Khoury, Sylvain Hallé, Muni Venkateswarlu K. |
CRiSIS | 3 |
| 2022 | Self-Stabilizing Secure Computation
Dan Brownstein, Shlomi Dolev, Muni Venkateswarlu K. |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 3 |
| 2019 | Perennial secure multi-party computation of universal Turing machine
Shlomi Dolev, Juan A. Garay 0001, Niv Gilboa, Vladimir Kolesnikov, Muni Venkateswarlu K. |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 5 |
| 2017 | Brief Announcement: Secure Self-Stabilizing ComputationabstractSelf-stabilization refers to the ability of systems to recover after temporal violations of conditions required for their correct operation. Such violations may lead the system to an arbitrary state from which it should automatically recover. Today, beyond recovering functionality, there is a need to recover security and confidentiality guarantees as well. To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no self-stabilizing protocols that also ensure recovering confidentiality, authenticity, and integrity properties. Specifically, self-stabilizing systems are designed to regain functionality which is, roughly speaking, desired input output relation, ignoring the security and confidentiality of computation and its state. Distributed (cryptographic) protocols for generic secure and privacy-preserving computation, e.g., secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC), usually ensure secrecy of inputs and outputs, and correctness of computation when the adversary is limited to compromise only a fraction of the components in the system, e.g., the computation is secure only in the presence of an honest majority of involved parties. While there are MPC protocols that are secure against a dishonest majority, in reality, the adversary may compromise all components of the system for a while; some of the corrupted components may then recover, e.g., due to security patches and software updates, or periodical code refresh and local state consistency check and enforcement based on self-stabilizing hardware and software techniques. It is currently unclear if a system and its state can be designed to always fully recover following such individual asynchronous recoveries. This paper introduces Secure Self-stabilizing Computation which answers this question in the affirmative. Secure self-stabilizing computation design ensures that secrecy of inputs and outputs, and correctness of the computation are automatically regained, even if at some point the entire system is compromised. We consider the distributed computation task as the implementation of virtual global finite satiate machine (FSM) to present commonly realized computation. The FSM is designed to regain consistency and security in the presence of a minority of Byzantine participants, e.g., one third of the parties, and following a temporary corruption of the entire system. We use this task and settings to demonstrate the definition of secure self-stabilizing computation. We show how our algorithms and system autonomously restore security and confidentiality of the computation of the FSM once the required corruption thresholds are again respected. Shlomi Dolev, Karim M. El Defrawy, Juan A. Garay 0001, Muni Venkateswarlu K., Rafail Ostrovsky, Moti Yung |
PODC | 4 |
| 2017 | Improving of entropy adaptive on-line compression
Shlomi Dolev, Sergey Frenkel, Marina Kopeetsky, Muni Venkateswarlu K. |
Wirel. Networks | 4 |