Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yu Chen 0099
dblp:87/1254-99
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-4709-2892ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification › automated scoring
automated essay scoring |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Activations as Features: Probing LLMs for Generalizable Essay Scoring Representations · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
activation probing |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Activations as Features: Probing LLMs for Generalizable Essay Scoring Representations · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probing · 1.0activation analysis · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Activations as Features: Probing LLMs for Generalizable Essay Scoring RepresentationsabstractAutomated essay scoring (AES) is a challenging task in cross-prompt settings due to the diversity of scoring criteria. While previous studies have focused on the output of large language models (LLMs) to improve scoring accuracy, we believe activations from intermediate layers may also provide valuable information. To explore this possibility, we evaluated the discriminative power of LLMs’ activations in cross-prompt essay scoring task. Specifically, we used activation to fit probes and further analyzed the effects of different models and input content of LLMs on this discriminative power. By computing the directions of essays across various trait dimensions under different prompts, we analyzed the variation in evaluation perspectives of large language models concerning essay types and traits. Results show that the activations possess strong discriminative power in evaluating essay quality and that LLMs can adapt their evaluation perspectives to different traits and essay types, effectively handling the diversity of scoring criteria in cross-prompt settings. Jinwei Chi, Ke Wang 0068, Yu Chen 0099, Xuanye Lin |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2026 | Semantic-Guided Fast Adversarial Training via Class Relationship ExploitationabstractFast Adversarial Training (FAT) is known for its efficiency but is often constrained by the limited quality of single-step adversarial examples (AEs), which weakens robust learning signals and leads to unstable optimization. Because of its single-step nature, many generated AEs fail to cross decision boundaries effectively, resulting in diluted robustness improvements. We identify that this limitation stems from a fundamental mismatch: single-step perturbations ignore the semantic vulnerability manifold—low-dimensional subspaces where decision boundaries are thinnest due to class semantic relationships (CSRs). While multi-step attacks implicitly navigate this manifold, single-step methods generate isotropic perturbations that rarely align with these fragile directions. Building on this insight, we propose Semantic-Guided Fast Adversarial Training (SG-FAT), a unified framework that steers single-step attacks along CSR subspaces through three synergistic components operating under a common principle: constrain perturbations to semantic vulnerability directions. SG-FAT improves the quality of single-step adversarial examples and stabilizes training while maintaining computational efficiency. Compared with existing fast AT methods, SG-FAT consistently achieves higher robustness across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet. Under PGD-10 attacks (ϵ = 8/255), SG-FAT improves robust accuracy by +2.38%, +1.49%, and +1.09%, respectively. Our code and training logs are available at https://github.com/SSonnyboy/SG-FAT. Yu Chen 0099, Ke Wang 0068, Jinwei Chi, Honghao Wei |
ICMR | 1 |
| 2026 | IUGC: A benchmark of landmark detection in end-to-end intrapartum ultrasound biometry
Jieyun Bai, Yitong Tang, Xiao Liu 0037, Jiale Hu, Yunda Li, Xufan Chen, Yunshu Li, Bowen Guo, Jing Jiao, Lifei Li, Yuzhang Ma, Xiaoxin Han, Haochen Shao, Qingchen Liu, Jingfan Kuang, Shanglin Song, Anirvan Krishna, Zaid Ahmed Khan, Zelan Li, Zhengyang Zhang, Hansen Zhang, Xuezhi Zhang, Lyuyang Tong, Bo Du 0004, Yu Chen 0099, Zilun Peng, Saeid Rezaei, Tom Weidong Cai, Fangyijie Wang, Kathleen M. Curran, Guénolé C. M. Silvestre, Isaac Khobo, Yaosheng Lu, Dong Ni 0001, Mohammad Yaqub, Jun Ma 0016, Karim Lekadir, Shuo Li 0001 |
Medical Image Anal. | 35 |
| 2026 | FUGC: Benchmarking Semi-Supervised Learning Methods for Cervical SegmentationabstractAccurate segmentation of cervical structures in transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is critical for assessing the risk of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB), yet the scarcity of labeled data limits the performance of supervised learning approaches. This paper introduces the Fetal Ultrasound Grand Challenge (FUGC), the first benchmark for semi-supervised learning in cervical segmentation, hosted at ISBI 2025. FUGC provides a dataset of 890 TVS images, including 500 training images, 90 validation images, and 300 test images. Methods were evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), and runtime (RT), with a weighted combination of 0.4/0.4/0.2. The challenge attracted 10 teams with 82 participants submitting innovative solutions. The best-performing methods for each individual metric achieved 90.26% mDSC, 38.88 mHD, and 32.85 ms RT, respectively. FUGC establishes a standardized benchmark for cervical segmentation, demonstrates the efficacy of semi-supervised methods with limited labeled data, and provides a foundation for AI-assisted clinical PTB risk assessment. Jieyun Bai, Yitong Tang, Mahdi Islam, Musarrat Tabassum, Enrique Almar-Munoz, Nianjiang Lv, Yu Chen 0099, Zilun Peng, Yusong Xiao, Li Xiao 0002, Nam-Khanh Tran, Dac-Phu Phan-Le, Hai-Dang Nguyen, Xiao Liu 0037, Jiale Hu, Mingxu Huang, Jitao Liang, Chaolu Feng, Xuezhi Zhang, Lyuyang Tong, Bo Du 0001, Ha-Hieu Pham, Thanh-Huy Nguyen, Min Xu 0009, Juntao Jiang, Jiangning Zhang, Yong Liu 0007, Md. Kamrul Hasan 0002, Zhuonan Liang, Tom Weidong Cai, Gongning Luo, Mohammad Yaqub, Karim Lekadir |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 11 |