Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bill Williamson

dblp:87/3067 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
0000-0003-1710-9945ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
surgical robotics
0.021994
An image-directed robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1994
A surgical robot for total hip replacement surgery · ICRA 1992
Medical and health informatics
orthopedic surgery
0.011994
An image-directed robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1994
Medical and health informatics › surgical robotics
orthopedic surgical robot
0.011992
A surgical robot for total hip replacement surgery · ICRA 1992
Robotics › Robot manipulation › industrial robot
machining robot
0.021994
An image-directed robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1994
A surgical robot for total hip replacement surgery · ICRA 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

CT-based presurgical planning · 0.0robotic cavity preparation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Providing visual information to validate 2-D to 3-D registration
André Guéziec, Kenong Wu, Alan D. Kalvin, Bill Williamson, Peter Kazanzides, Robert Van Vorhis
Medical Image Anal.4
1999 Exploiting 2-D to 3-D Intra-operative Image Registration for Qualitative Evaluations and Post-operative Simulations
André Guéziec, Kenong Wu, Bill Williamson, Peter Kazanzides, Robert Van Vorhis, Alan D. Kalvin
MICCAI3
1999 Computer-integrated revision total hip replacement surgery: concept and preliminary results
abstract
This paper describes an ongoing project to develop a computer-integrated system to assist surgeons in revision total hip replacement (RTHR) surgery. In RTHR surgery, a failing orthopedic hip implant, typically cemented, is replaced with a new one by removing the old implant, removing the cement and fitting a new implant into an enlarged canal broached in the femur. RTHR surgery is a difficult procedure fraught with technical challenges and a high incidence of complications. The goals of the computer-based system are the significant reduction of cement removal labor and time, the elimination of cortical wall penetration and femur fracture, the improved positioning and fit of the new implant resulting from precise, high-quality canal milling and the reduction of bone sacrificed to fit the new implant. Our starting points are the ROBODOC system for primary hip replacement surgery and the manual RTHR surgical protocol. We first discuss the main difficulties of computer-integrated RTHR surgery and identify key issues and possible solutions. We then describe possible system architectures and protocols for preoperative planning and intraoperative execution. We present a summary of methods and preliminary results in CT image metal artifact removal, interactive cement cut-volume definition and cement machining, anatomy-based registration using fluoroscopic X-ray images and clinical trials using an extended RTHR version of ROBODOC. We conclude with a summary of lessons learned and a discussion of current and future work.
Russell H. Taylor, Leo Joskowicz, Bill Williamson, André Guéziec, Alan D. Kalvin, Peter Kazanzides, Robert Van Vorhis, Jianhua Yao 0001, Rajesh Kumar 0001, Andrew Bzostek, Alind Sahay, Martin Börner, Armin Lahmer
Medical Image Anal.3
1998 Anatomy based registration of CT-scan and intraoperative X-ray images for guiding a surgical robot
abstract
We describe new methods for rigid registration of a preoperative computed tomography (CT)-scan image to a set of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopic images, for guiding a surgical robot to its trajectory planned from CT. Our goal is to perform the registration, i.e., compute a rotation and translation of one data set with respect to the other to within a prescribed accuracy, based upon bony anatomy only, without external fiducial markers. With respect to previous approaches, the following aspects are new: 1) we correct the geometric distortion in fluoroscopic images and calibrate them directly with respect to the robot by affixing to it a new calibration device designed as a radiolucent rod with embedded metallic markers, and by moving the device along two planes, while radiographs are being acquired at regular intervals; 2) the registration uses an algorithm for computing the best transformation between a set of lines in three space, the (intraoperative) X-ray paths, and a set of points on the surface of the bone (imaged preoperatively), in a statistically robust fashion, using the Cayley parameterization of a rotation; and 3) to find corresponding sets of points to the X-ray paths on the surfaces, our new approach consists of extracting the surface apparent contours for a given viewpoint, as a set of closed three-dimensional nonplanar curves, before registering the apparent contours to X-ray paths. Aside from algorithms, there are a number of major technical difficulties associated with engineering a clinically viable system using anatomy and image-based registration. To detect and solve them, we have so far conducted two experiments with the surgical robot in an operating room (OR), using CT and fluoroscopic image data of a cadaver bone, and attempting to faithfully simulate clinical conditions. Such experiments indicate that intraoperative X-ray-based registration is a promising alternative to marker-based registration for clinical use with our proposed method.
André Guéziec, Peter Kazanzides, Bill Williamson, Russell H. Taylor
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging3
1994 An image-directed robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery
abstract
The authors have developed an image-directed robotic system to augment the performance of human surgeons in precise bone machining procedures in orthopaedic surgery, initially targeted at cementless total hip replacement surgery. The total system consists of an interactive CT-based presurgical planning component and a surgical system consisting of a robot, redundant motion monitoring, and man-machine interface components. In vitro experiments conducted with this system have demonstrated an order-of-magnitude improvement in implant fit and placement accuracy, compared to standard manual preparation techniques. The first generation system described in this paper was used in a successful veterinary clinical trial on 26 dogs needing hip replacement surgery. It was the basis for subsequent development of a second-generation system that is now in human clinical trials.>
Russell H. Taylor, Brent D. Mittelstadt 0001, Howard A. Paul, William Hanson, Peter Kazanzides, Joel F. Zuhars, Bill Williamson, Bela L. Musits, Edward Glassman, William L. Bargar
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.7
1992 A surgical robot for total hip replacement surgery
abstract
The authors describe a robotic surgical system that has been designed to create femoral cavities that are precisely shaped and positioned for implantation of uncemented prostheses. This robotics system creates cavities with a dimensional accuracy more than 50 times greater than broached cavities, exceeds the tolerances to which implants are manufactured, and does not produce gaps that prevent bone ingrowth. A canine study was undertaken to evaluate the prosthesis fit and placement achieved by employing a surgical robot to prepare the femur. This study compared the results achieved on 15 dogs undergoing total hip replacement with manual broaching techniques and 25 dogs undergoing robotically assisted surgery. Among the 25 dogs, which ranged in age from 2/sup 1///sub 2/ to 11 years, there were no deaths, no infections, and no intraoperative complications. Human applications of this technique are also considered.>
Howard A. Paul, Brent Mittlestadt, William L. Bargar, Bela L. Musits, Russell H. Taylor, Peter Kazanzides, Joel F. Zuhars, Bill Williamson, William Hanson
ICRA8