Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Baker 0001
dblp:87/3352
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7896-6217ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 10 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
protein backbone generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem · ICLR 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
motif scaffolding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem · ICLR 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein structure design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem · ICLR 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
residue contact prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Protein contact prediction using metagenome sequence data and residual neural networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.4 | 4 | 2020 | Protein contact prediction using metagenome sequence data and residual neural networks · Bioinform. 2020 Foldit Standalone: a video game-derived protein structure manipulation interface using Rosetta · Bioinform. 2017 Feature Selection Methods for Improving Protein Structure Prediction with Rosetta · NIPS 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Foldit Standalone: a video game-derived protein structure manipulation interface using Rosetta · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics › structural similarity
protein structure similarity |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Structure similarity measure with penalty for close non-equivalent residues · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
template-based modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Foldit Standalone: a video game-derived protein structure manipulation interface using Rosetta · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Feature Selection Methods for Improving Protein Structure Prediction with Rosetta · NIPS 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › template-based modeling
homology modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Structure similarity measure with penalty for close non-equivalent residues · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
model quality assessment |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Structure similarity measure with penalty for close non-equivalent residues · Bioinform. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion probabilistic modeling · 1.33d generative modeling · 1.3residual neural network · 0.4multiple sequence alignment · 0.4covariance features · 0.4rigid body transformation · 0.3molecular modeling · 0.3total score with repulsion · 0.1GDT_TS · 0.1decision tree · 0.1parallel structure prediction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem
Brian L. Trippe, Jason Yim, Doug Tischer, David Baker 0001, Tamara Broderick, Regina Barzilay, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2023 | Fast and versatile sequence-independent protein docking for nanomaterials design using RPXDockabstractComputationally designed multi-subunit assemblies have shown considerable promise for a variety of applications, including a new generation of potent vaccines. One of the major routes to such materials is rigid body sequence-independent docking of cyclic oligomers into architectures with point group or lattice symmetries. Current methods for docking and designing such assemblies are tailored to specific classes of symmetry and are difficult to modify for novel applications. Here we describe RPXDock, a fast, flexible, and modular software package for sequence-independent rigid-body protein docking across a wide range of symmetric architectures that is easily customizable for further development. RPXDock uses an efficient hierarchical search and a residue-pair transform (RPX) scoring method to rapidly search through multidimensional docking space. We describe the structure of the software, provide practical guidelines for its use, and describe the available functionalities including a variety of score functions and filtering tools that can be used to guide and refine docking results towards desired configurations. William Sheffler, Erin C. Yang, Quinton Dowling, Yang Hsia, Chelsea N. Fries, Jenna Stanislaw, Mark D. Langowski, Marisa Brandys, Rebecca Skotheim, Andrew J. Borst, Alena Khmelinskaia, Neil P. King, David Baker 0001 |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 14 |
| 2022 | Characterizing and explaining the impact of disease-associated mutations in proteins without known structures or structural homologsabstractMutations in human proteins lead to diseases. The structure of these proteins can help understand the mechanism of such diseases and develop therapeutics against them. With improved deep learning techniques, such as RoseTTAFold and AlphaFold, we can predict the structure of proteins even in the absence of structural homologs. We modeled and extracted the domains from 553 disease-associated human proteins without known protein structures or close homologs in the Protein Databank. We noticed that the model quality was higher and the Root mean square deviation (RMSD) lower between AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold models for domains that could be assigned to CATH families as compared to those which could only be assigned to Pfam families of unknown structure or could not be assigned to either. We predicted ligand-binding sites, protein-protein interfaces and conserved residues in these predicted structures. We then explored whether the disease-associated missense mutations were in the proximity of these predicted functional sites, whether they destabilized the protein structure based on ddG calculations or whether they were predicted to be pathogenic. We could explain 80% of these disease-associated mutations based on proximity to functional sites, structural destabilization or pathogenicity. When compared to polymorphisms, a larger percentage of disease-associated missense mutations were buried, closer to predicted functional sites, predicted as destabilizing and pathogenic. Usage of models from the two state-of-the-art techniques provide better confidence in our predictions, and we explain 93 additional mutations based on RoseTTAFold models which could not be explained based solely on AlphaFold models. Neeladri Sen, Ivan Anishchenko, Nicola Bordin, Ian Sillitoe, Sameer Velankar, David Baker 0001, Christine A. Orengo |
Briefings Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2021 | Protein sequence optimization with a pairwise decomposable penalty for buried unsatisfied hydrogen bondsabstractIn aqueous solution, polar groups make hydrogen bonds with water, and hence burial of such groups in the interior of a protein is unfavorable unless the loss of hydrogen bonds with water is compensated by formation of new ones with other protein groups. For this reason, buried "unsatisfied" polar groups making no hydrogen bonds are very rare in proteins. Efficiently representing the energetic cost of unsatisfied hydrogen bonds with a pairwise-decomposable energy term during protein design is challenging since whether or not a group is satisfied depends on all of its neighbors. Here we describe a method for assigning a pairwise-decomposable energy to sidechain rotamers such that following combinatorial sidechain packing, buried unsaturated polar atoms are penalized. The penalty can be any quadratic function of the number of unsatisfied polar groups, and can be computed very rapidly. We show that inclusion of this term in Rosetta sidechain packing calculations substantially reduces the number of buried unsatisfied polar groups. Brian Coventry, David Baker 0001 |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2020 | Protein contact prediction using metagenome sequence data and residual neural networksabstractMOTIVATION: Almost all protein residue contact prediction methods rely on the availability of deep multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). However, many proteins from the poorly populated families do not have sufficient number of homologs in the conventional UniProt database. Here we aim to solve this issue by exploring the rich sequence data from the metagenome sequencing projects. RESULTS: Based on the improved MSA constructed from the metagenome sequence data, we developed MapPred, a new deep learning-based contact prediction method. MapPred consists of two component methods, DeepMSA and DeepMeta, both trained with the residual neural networks. DeepMSA was inspired by the recent method DeepCov, which was trained on 441 matrices of covariance features. By considering the symmetry of contact map, we reduced the number of matrices to 231, which makes the training more efficient in DeepMSA. Experiments show that DeepMSA outperforms DeepCov by 10-13% in precision. DeepMeta works by combining predicted contacts and other sequence profile features. Experiments on three benchmark datasets suggest that the contribution from the metagenome sequence data is significant with P-values less than 4.04E-17. MapPred is shown to be complementary and comparable the state-of-the-art methods. The success of MapPred is attributed to three factors: the deeper MSA from the metagenome sequence data, improved feature design in DeepMSA and optimized training by the residual neural networks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://yanglab.nankai.edu.cn/mappred/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Qi Wu 0016, Zhen-Ling Peng, Ivan Anishchenko, Qian Cong, David Baker 0001, Jianyi Yang 0002 |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2020 | Better together: Elements of successful scientific software development in a distributed collaborative communityabstractMany scientific disciplines rely on computational methods for data analysis, model generation, and prediction. Implementing these methods is often accomplished by researchers with domain expertise but without formal training in software engineering or computer science. This arrangement has led to underappreciation of sustainability and maintainability of scientific software tools developed in academic environments. Some software tools have avoided this fate, including the scientific library Rosetta. We use this software and its community as a case study to show how modern software development can be accomplished successfully, irrespective of subject area. Rosetta is one of the largest software suites for macromolecular modeling, with 3.1 million lines of code and many state-of-the-art applications. Since the mid 1990s, the software has been developed collaboratively by the RosettaCommons, a community of academics from over 60 institutions worldwide with diverse backgrounds including chemistry, biology, physiology, physics, engineering, mathematics, and computer science. Developing this software suite has provided us with more than two decades of experience in how to effectively develop advanced scientific software in a global community with hundreds of contributors. Here we illustrate the functioning of this development community by addressing technical aspects (like version control, testing, and maintenance), community-building strategies, diversity efforts, software dissemination, and user support. We demonstrate how modern computational research can thrive in a distributed collaborative community. The practices described here are independent of subject area and can be readily adopted by other software development communities. Julia Koehler Leman, Brian D. Weitzner, P. Douglas Renfrew, Steven M. Lewis, Rocco Moretti, Andrew M. Watkins, Vikram Khipple Mulligan, Sergey Lyskov, Jared Adolf-Bryfogle, Jason W. Labonte, Justyna Krys, Christopher Bystroff, William R. Schief, Dominik Gront, Ora Schueler-Furman, David Baker 0001, Philip Bradley, Roland L. Dunbrack Jr., Tanja Kortemme, Andrew Leaver-Fay, Charlie E. M. Strauss, Jens Meiler, Brian Kuhlman, Jeffrey J. Gray, Richard Bonneau |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 17 |
| 2017 | Foldit Standalone: a video game-derived protein structure manipulation interface using RosettaabstractSUMMARY: Foldit Standalone is an interactive graphical interface to the Rosetta molecular modeling package. In contrast to most command-line or batch interactions with Rosetta, Foldit Standalone is designed to allow easy, real-time, direct manipulation of protein structures, while also giving access to the extensive power of Rosetta computations. Derived from the user interface of the scientific discovery game Foldit (itself based on Rosetta), Foldit Standalone has added more advanced features and removed the competitive game elements. Foldit Standalone was built from the ground up with a custom rendering and event engine, configurable visualizations and interactions driven by Rosetta. Foldit Standalone contains, among other features: electron density and contact map visualizations, multiple sequence alignment tools for template-based modeling, rigid body transformation controls, RosettaScripts support and an embedded Lua interpreter. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Foldit Standalone is available for download at https://fold.it/standalone , under the Rosetta license, which is free for academic and non-profit users. It is implemented in cross-platform C ++ and binary executables are available for Windows, macOS and Linux. CONTACT: [email protected]. Robert Kleffner, Jeff Flatten, Andrew Leaver-Fay, David Baker 0001, Justin B. Siegel, Firas Khatib, Seth Cooper |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2015 | FireProt: Energy- and Evolution-Based Computational Design of Thermostable Multiple-Point MutantsabstractThere is great interest in increasing proteins' stability to enhance their utility as biocatalysts, therapeutics, diagnostics and nanomaterials. Directed evolution is a powerful, but experimentally strenuous approach. Computational methods offer attractive alternatives. However, due to the limited reliability of predictions and potentially antagonistic effects of substitutions, only single-point mutations are usually predicted in silico, experimentally verified and then recombined in multiple-point mutants. Thus, substantial screening is still required. Here we present FireProt, a robust computational strategy for predicting highly stable multiple-point mutants that combines energy- and evolution-based approaches with smart filtering to identify additive stabilizing mutations. FireProt's reliability and applicability was demonstrated by validating its predictions against 656 mutations from the ProTherm database. We demonstrate that thermostability of the model enzymes haloalkane dehalogenase DhaA and γ-hexachlorocyclohexane dehydrochlorinase LinA can be substantially increased (ΔTm = 24°C and 21°C) by constructing and characterizing only a handful of multiple-point mutants. FireProt can be applied to any protein for which a tertiary structure and homologous sequences are available, and will facilitate the rapid development of robust proteins for biomedical and biotechnological applications. David Bednar, Koen Beerens, Eva Sebestova, Jaroslav Bendl, Sagar D. Khare, Radka Chaloupkova, Zbynek Prokop, Jan Brezovsky, David Baker 0001, Jirí Damborský |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 9 |
| 2014 | High-Resolution Modeling of Transmembrane Helical Protein Structures from Distant HomologuesabstractEukaryotic transmembrane helical (TMH) proteins perform a wide diversity of critical cellular functions, but remain structurally largely uncharacterized and their high-resolution structure prediction is currently hindered by the lack of close structural homologues. To address this problem, we present a novel and generic method for accurately modeling large TMH protein structures from distant homologues exhibiting distinct loop and TMH conformations. Models of the adenosine A2AR and chemokine CXCR4 receptors were first ranked in GPCR-DOCK blind prediction contests in the receptor structure accuracy category. In a benchmark of 50 TMH protein homolog pairs of diverse topology (from 5 to 12 TMHs), size (from 183 to 420 residues) and sequence identity (from 15% to 70%), the method improves most starting templates, and achieves near-atomic accuracy prediction of membrane-embedded regions. Unlike starting templates, the models are of suitable quality for computer-based protein engineering: redesigned models and redesigned X-ray structures exhibit very similar native interactions. The method should prove useful for the atom-level modeling and design of a large fraction of structurally uncharacterized TMH proteins from a wide range of structural homologues. Kuang-Yui M. Chen, Jason S. Salvo, David Baker 0001, Patrick Barth |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |
| 2011 | Analysis of social gameplay macros in the Foldit cookbookabstractAs games grow in complexity, gameplay needs to provide players with powerful means of managing this complexity. One approach is to give automation tools to players. In this paper, we analyze an in-game automation tool, the Foldit cookbook, for the scientific discovery game Foldit. The cookbook allows players to write recipes that can automate their strategies. Through analysis of cookbook usage, we observe that players take advantage of social mechanisms in the game to share, run, and modify recipes. Further, players take advantage of both a simplified visual programming interface and a text-based scripting interface for creating recipes. This indicates that there is potential for using automation tools to disseminate expert knowledge, and that it is useful to provide support for multiple authoring styles, especially for games where the final game goal is unbounded or hard to attain. Seth Cooper, Firas Khatib, Ilya Makedon, Hao Lü, Janos Barbero, David Baker 0001, James Fogarty, Zoran Popovic |
FDG | 6 |
| 2010 | The challenge of designing scientific discovery gamesabstractIncorporating the individual and collective problem solving skills of non-experts into the scientific discovery process could potentially accelerate the advancement of science. This paper discusses the design process used for Foldit, a multiplayer online biochemistry game that presents players with computationally difficult protein folding problems in the form of puzzles, allowing ordinary players to gain expertise and help solve these problems. The principle challenge of designing such scientific discovery games is harnessing the enormous collective problem-solving potential of the game playing population, who have not been previously introduced to the specific problem, or, often, the entire scientific discipline. To address this challenge, we took an iterative approach to designing the game, incorporating feedback from players and biochemical experts alike. Feedback was gathered both before and after releasing the game, to create the rules, interactions, and visualizations in Foldit that maximize contributions from game players. We present several examples of how this approach guided the game's design, and allowed us to improve both the quality of the gameplay and the application of player problem-solving. Seth Cooper, Adrien Treuille, Janos Barbero, Andrew Leaver-Fay, Kathleen Tuite, Firas Khatib, Alex Cho Snyder, Michael Beenen, David Salesin, David Baker 0001, Zoran Popovic |
FDG | 10 |
| 2009 | Structure similarity measure with penalty for close non-equivalent residuesabstractMOTIVATION: Recent improvement in homology-based structure modeling emphasizes the importance of sensitive evaluation measures that help identify and correct modest distortions in models compared with the target structures. Global Distance Test Total Score (GDT_TS), otherwise a very powerful and effective measure for model evaluation, is still insensitive to and can even reward such distortions, as observed for remote homology modeling in the latest CASP8 (Comparative Assessment of Structure Prediction). RESULTS: We develop a new measure that balances GDT_TS reward for the closeness of equivalent model and target residues ('attraction' term) with the penalty for the closeness of non-equivalent residues ('repulsion' term). Compared with GDT_TS, the resulting score, TR (total score with repulsion), is much more sensitive to structure compression both in real remote homologs and in CASP models. TR is correlated yet different from other measures of structure similarity. The largest difference from GDT_TS is observed in models of mid-range quality based on remote homology modeling. AVAILABILITY: The script for TR calculation is included in Supplementary Material. TR scores for all server models in CASP8 are available at http://prodata.swmed.edu/CASP8. Ruslan Sadreyev, Shuoyong Shi, David Baker 0001, Nick V. Grishin |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2009 | Computation of Conformational Coupling in Allosteric ProteinsabstractIn allosteric regulation, an effector molecule binding a protein at one site induces conformational changes, which alter structure and function at a distant active site. Two key challenges in the computational modeling of allostery are the prediction of the structure of one allosteric state starting from the structure of the other, and elucidating the mechanisms underlying the conformational coupling of the effector and active sites. Here we approach these two challenges using the Rosetta high-resolution structure prediction methodology. We find that the method can recapitulate the relaxation of effector-bound forms of single domain allosteric proteins into the corresponding ligand-free states, particularly when sampling is focused on regions known to change conformation most significantly. Analysis of the coupling between contacting pairs of residues in large ensembles of conformations spread throughout the landscape between and around the two allosteric states suggests that the transitions are built up from blocks of tightly coupled interacting sets of residues that are more loosely coupled to one another. Brian A. Kidd, David Baker 0001, Wendy E. Thomas |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2007 | Feature Selection Methods for Improving Protein Structure Prediction with RosettaabstractRosetta is one of the leading algorithms for protein structure prediction today. It is a Monte Carlo energy minimization method requiring many random restarts to find structures with low energy. In this paper we present a resampling technique for structure prediction of small alpha/beta proteins using Rosetta. From an ini- tial round of Rosetta sampling, we learn properties of the energy landscape that guide a subsequent round of sampling toward lower-energy structures. Rather than attempt to fit the full energy landscape, we use feature selection methods—both L1-regularized linear regression and decision trees—to identify structural features that give rise to low energy. We then enrich these structural features in the second sampling round. Results are presented across a benchmark set of nine small al- pha/beta proteins demonstrating that our methods seldom impair, and frequently improve, Rosetta’s performance. Ben Blum, Michael I. Jordan, David E. Kim, Rhiju Das, Philip Bradley, David Baker 0001 |
NIPS | 6 |
| 2006 | Parallelization and performance characterization of protein 3D structure prediction of RosettaabstractThe prediction of protein 3D structure has become a hot research area in the post-genome era, through which people can understand a protein's function in health and disease, explore ways to control its actions and assist drug design. Many protein structure prediction approaches have been proposed in past decades. Among them, Rosetta is one of the best systems. However, the huge time complexity of Rosetta, e.g. a few days to predict a protein, limits its wide use in practice. To accelerate the prediction of protein 3D structure in Rosetta, this paper presents three different approaches, i.e., non-interactive, periodic interactive and asynchronous dynamic interactive scheme, to parallelize Rosetta. The asynchronous interactive scheme, with the adaptation of dynamic solution interaction, outperforms the other two, delivering much faster convergence speed and better solution quality. Detailed measurements and performance analysis also indicate that parallel Rosetta with asynchronous dynamic interactive scheme scales well Wenlong Li 0003, Tao Wang 0003, Eric Q. Li, David Baker 0001, Steven Ge, Yurong Chen 0001, Yimin Zhang 0002 |
IPDPS | 4 |
| 2006 | Poster reception - High resolution, high throughput protein structure prediction using IBM Blue Gene supercomputers: predicting CASP targets in record timeabstractHigh-resolution 3-dimensional structures of proteins can help in functional annotation and also explain the underlying mechanisms of protein interactions. The ability to quickly and accurately predict a protein's structure from its sequence is an important challenge in computational structural biology. Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) is a biannual community-wide competition for protein structure prediction and an important benchmark for judging the performance of the various protein structure prediction algorithm.CASP 7 ran from May 11th to August 10th 2006 and for the first time we have been able to make use of the unprecedented computational power provided by Blue Gene systems at San Diego Supercomputer Center, Argonne National Lab and IBM TJWatson with the Rosetta protein structure prediction code. We describe the results of our CASP predictions and detail how access to Blue Gene systems has impacted our protein structure design approach. Ross C. Walker, Srivatsan Raman, David Baker 0001 |
SC | 3 |