EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ajay M. Joshi
dblp:87/3998
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 44% Electronic design automation · 44% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › power estimation
peak power estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automated microprocessor stressmark generation · HPCA 2008 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automated microprocessor stressmark generation · HPCA 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic benchmark generation · 0.1machine learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Automated microprocessor stressmark generationabstractEstimating the maximum power and thermal characteristics of a processor is essential for designing its power delivery system, packaging, cooling, and power/thermal management schemes. Typical benchmark suites used in performance evaluation do not stress the processor to its limit though, and current practice in industry is to develop artificial benchmarks that are specifically written to generate maximum processor (component) activity. However, manually developing and tuning so called stressmarks is extremely tedious and time-consuming while requiring an intimate understanding of the processor. A synthetic program that can be tuned to produce a variety of benchmark characteristics would significantly help in addressing this problem by enabling the automatic exploration of the large temperature and power design space. This paper demonstrates that with a suitable choice of only 40 hardware-independent program characteristics related to the instruction mix, instruction-level parallelism, control flow behavior, and memory access patterns, it is possible to generate a synthetic benchmark whose performance relates to that of general-purpose and commercial applications. Leveraging this abstract workload modeling approach, we propose StressMaker, a framework that uses machine learning for the automated generation of stressmarks. A comparison with an exhaustive exploration of a large power design space demonstrates that StressMaker is very effective in automatically generating stressmarks in a limited amount of time. Ajay M. Joshi, Lieven Eeckhout, Lizy Kurian John, Ciji Isen |
HPCA | 1 |
| 2007 | Exploring the Application Behavior Space Using Parameterized Synthetic Benchmarks
Ajay M. Joshi, Lieven Eeckhout, Lizy Kurian John |
PACT | 1 |