Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maarten Mariën

dblp:87/4237 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 8 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › uncertainty reasoning
approximate reasoning
0.112008
Approximate Reasoning in First-Order Logic Theories · KR 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning
0.112008
Grounding with Bounds · AAAI 2008
Logic in computer science
first-order logic
0.012008
Approximate Reasoning in First-Order Logic Theories · KR 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bound-based grounding · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Grounding FO and FO(ID) with Bounds
abstract
Grounding is the task of reducing a first-order theory and finite domain to an equivalent propositional theory. It is used as preprocessing phase in many logic-based reasoning systems. Such systems provide a rich first-order input language to a user and can rely on efficient propositional solvers to perform the actual reasoning. Besides a first-order theory and finite domain, the input for grounders contains in many applications also additional data. By exploiting this data, the size of the grounder's output can often be reduced significantly. A common practice to improve the efficiency of a grounder in this context is by manually adding semantically redundant information to the input theory, indicating where and when the grounder should exploit the data. In this paper we present a method to compute and add such redundant information automatically. Our method therefore simplifies the task of writing input theories that can be grounded efficiently by current systems. We first present our method for classical first-order logic (FO) theories. Then we extend it to FO(ID), the extension of FO with inductive definitions, which allows for more concise and comprehensive input theories. We discuss implementation issues and experimentally validate the practical applicability of our method.
Johan Wittocx, Maarten Mariën, Marc Denecker
J. Artif. Intell. Res.2
2008 Grounding with Bounds
Johan Wittocx, Maarten Mariën, Marc Denecker
AAAI2
2008 Approximate Reasoning in First-Order Logic Theories
Johan Wittocx, Maarten Mariën, Marc Denecker
KR2
2008 SAT(ID): Satisfiability of Propositional Logic Extended with Inductive Definitions
Maarten Mariën, Johan Wittocx, Marc Denecker, Maurice Bruynooghe
SAT1
2007 Integrating Inductive Definitions in SAT
Maarten Mariën, Johan Wittocx, Marc Denecker
LPAR1
2007 Predicate Introduction for Logics with a Fixpoint Semantics. Part I: Logic Programming
Joost Vennekens, Johan Wittocx, Maarten Mariën, Marc Denecker
Fundam. Informaticae3
2007 Predicate Introduction for Logics with Fixpoint Semantics. Part II: Autoepistemic Logic
Joost Vennekens, Johan Wittocx, Maarten Mariën, Marc Denecker
Fundam. Informaticae3
2006 Predicate Introduction Under Stable and Well-Founded Semantics
Johan Wittocx, Joost Vennekens, Maarten Mariën, Marc Denecker, Maurice Bruynooghe
ICLP3
2005 Satisfiability Checking for PC(ID)
Maarten Mariën, Rudradeb Mitra, Marc Denecker, Maurice Bruynooghe
LPAR1
2004 On the Relation Between ID-Logic and Answer Set Programming
Maarten Mariën, David Gilis, Marc Denecker
JELIA1