Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Randy L. Ribler

dblp:87/4720 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 50% Embedded and real-time systems · 38% Distributed systems · 12%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 61% Internet architecture and protocols · 30% Network performance modeling · 9%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › control systems
adaptive control
0.011998
Autopilot: Adaptive Control of Distributed Applications · HPDC 1998
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale
0.011998
Autopilot: Adaptive Control of Distributed Applications · HPDC 1998
Network measurement and analytics
traffic characterization
0.011995
Multimedia Traffic Analysis Using CHITRA95 · ACM Multimedia 1995
Internet architecture and protocols › world wide web
web traffic
0.011995
Multimedia Traffic Analysis Using CHITRA95 · ACM Multimedia 1995
Network measurement and analytics
workload characterization
0.011995
Multimedia Traffic Analysis Using CHITRA95 · ACM Multimedia 1995
High-performance computing
parallel i/o
0.011998
Autopilot: Adaptive Control of Distributed Applications · HPDC 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed sensors and actuators · 0.0closed-loop control · 0.0trace visualization · 0.0tcpdump log analysis · 0.0statistical analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 The Autopilot performance-directed adaptive control system
Randy L. Ribler, Huseyin Simitci, Daniel A. Reed
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.1
1998 Autopilot: Adaptive Control of Distributed Applications
abstract
With increasing development of applications for heterogeneous, distributed computing grids, the focus of performance analysis has shifted from a posteriori optimization on homogeneous parallel systems to application tuning for heterogeneous resources with time varying availability. This shift has profound implications for performance instrumentation and analysis techniques. Autopilot is a new infrastructure for dynamic performance tuning of heterogeneous computational grids based on closed loop control. The paper describes the Autopilot model of distributed sensors, actuators, and decision procedures, reports preliminary performance benchmarks, and presents a case study in which the Autopilot library is utilized in the development of an adaptive parallel input/output system.
Randy L. Ribler, Jeffrey S. Vetter, Huseyin Simitci, Daniel A. Reed
HPDC1
1995 Multimedia Traffic Analysis Using CHITRA95
abstract
We describe how to investigate collections of trace data representing network delivery of multimedia information with CHITRA95, a tool that allows a user to visualize, query, statistically analyze and test, transform, and model collections of trace data. CHITRA95 is applied to characterize World Wide Web (WWW) traffic from three workloads: students in a classroom of network-connected workstations, graduate students browsing the Web, undergraduates browsing educational and other materials, as well as traffic on a courseware repository server. We explore the inter-access time of files on a server (i.e., recency), the hit rate from a proxy server cache, and the distributions of file sizes and media types requested. The traffic study also yields statistics on the effectiveness of caching to improve transfer rates. In contrast to past WWW traffic studies, we analyze client as well as server traffic; we compare three workloads rather than drawing conclusions from one workload; and we analyze tcpdump logs to calculate the performance improvement in throughput that an end user sees due to caching.
Marc Abrams, Stephen M. Williams, Ghaleb Abdulla, Shashin Patel, Randy L. Ribler, Edward A. Fox
ACM Multimedia5