Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timo Erkkilä
dblp:87/6104
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cell type composition estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Probabilistic analysis of gene expression measurements from heterogeneous tissues · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Probabilistic analysis of gene expression measurements from heterogeneous tissues · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Probabilistic analysis of gene expression measurements from heterogeneous tissues · Bioinform. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic modeling · 0.1linear regression · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Probabilistic analysis of gene expression measurements from heterogeneous tissuesabstractMOTIVATION: Tissue heterogeneity, arising from multiple cell types, is a major confounding factor in experiments that focus on studying cell types, e.g. their expression profiles, in isolation. Although sample heterogeneity can be addressed by manual microdissection, prior to conducting experiments, computational treatment on heterogeneous measurements have become a reliable alternative to perform this microdissection in silico. Favoring computation over manual purification has its advantages, such as time consumption, measuring responses of multiple cell types simultaneously, keeping samples intact of external perturbations and unaltered yield of molecular content. RESULTS: We formalize a probabilistic model, DSection, and show with simulations as well as with real microarray data that DSection attains increased modeling accuracy in terms of (i) estimating cell-type proportions of heterogeneous tissue samples, (ii) estimating replication variance and (iii) identifying differential expression across cell types under various experimental conditions. As our reference we use the corresponding linear regression model, which mirrors the performance of the majority of current non-probabilistic modeling approaches. AVAILABILITY AND SOFTWARE: All codes are written in Matlab, and are freely available upon request as well as at the project web page http://www.cs.tut.fi/∼erkkila2/. Furthermore, a web-application for DSection exists at http://informatics.systemsbiology.net/DSection. CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] Timo Erkkilä, Saara Lehmusvaara, Pekka Ruusuvuori, Tapio Visakorpi, Ilya Shmulevich, Harri Lähdesmäki |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2009 | A joint finite mixture model for clustering genes from independent Gaussian and beta distributed dataabstractBACKGROUND: Cluster analysis has become a standard computational method for gene function discovery as well as for more general explanatory data analysis. A number of different approaches have been proposed for that purpose, out of which different mixture models provide a principled probabilistic framework. Cluster analysis is increasingly often supplemented with multiple data sources nowadays, and these heterogeneous information sources should be made as efficient use of as possible. RESULTS: This paper presents a novel Beta-Gaussian mixture model (BGMM) for clustering genes based on Gaussian distributed and beta distributed data. The proposed BGMM can be viewed as a natural extension of the beta mixture model (BMM) and the Gaussian mixture model (GMM). The proposed BGMM method differs from other mixture model based methods in its integration of two different data types into a single and unified probabilistic modeling framework, which provides a more efficient use of multiple data sources than methods that analyze different data sources separately. Moreover, BGMM provides an exceedingly flexible modeling framework since many data sources can be modeled as Gaussian or beta distributed random variables, and it can also be extended to integrate data that have other parametric distributions as well, which adds even more flexibility to this model-based clustering framework. We developed three types of estimation algorithms for BGMM, the standard expectation maximization (EM) algorithm, an approximated EM and a hybrid EM, and propose to tackle the model selection problem by well-known model selection criteria, for which we test the Akaike information criterion (AIC), a modified AIC (AIC3), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and the integrated classification likelihood-BIC (ICL-BIC). CONCLUSION: Performance tests with simulated data show that combining two different data sources into a single mixture joint model greatly improves the clustering accuracy compared with either of its two extreme cases, GMM or BMM. Applications with real mouse gene expression data (modeled as Gaussian distribution) and protein-DNA binding probabilities (modeled as beta distribution) also demonstrate that BGMM can yield more biologically reasonable results compared with either of its two extreme cases. One of our applications has found three groups of genes that are likely to be involved in Myd88-dependent Toll-like receptor 3/4 (TLR-3/4) signaling cascades, which might be useful to better understand the TLR-3/4 signal transduction. Xiaofeng Dai, Timo Erkkilä, Olli Yli-Harja, Harri Lähdesmäki |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2008 | Efficient automated method for image-based classification of microbial cellsabstractMonitoring of bacterial populations requires automated analysis tools that provide accurate cell type quantification results. Here, methods for automated image analysis and bacteria type classification are presented. The classification method employs several discriminative features, calculated from automatically segmented images, for class determination. The performance of the algorithm is evaluated with a case study where three different bacterial types are present. Moreover, the accuracy of the method is demonstrated by generating experiments of synthetic bacterial population images. Pekka Ruusuvuori, Jenni Seppälä, Timo Erkkilä, Antti Lehmussola, Jaakko A. Puhakka, Olli Yli-Harja |
ICPR | 3 |
| 2004 | Tampere Verification Tool
Heikki Virtanen, Henri Hansen, Antti Valmari, Juha Nieminen, Timo Erkkilä |
TACAS | 5 |