Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paula B. Hawthorn

dblp:87/6282 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 4 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers
Database system architecture and tuning · 82% Query processing and optimization · 18%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 59% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 22% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 19%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database system architecture and tuning › database machine
database machine architecture
0.021982
Performance Analysis of Alternative Database Machine Architectures · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1982
A Performance Evaluation of Data Base Machine Architectures (Invited Paper) · VLDB 1981
Database system architecture and tuning
database machine
0.021981
The Effect of Target Applications on the Design of Database Machines · SIGMOD Conference 1981
Database Machines · VLDB 1980
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › database accelerator
database machine
0.011981
The Effect of Target Applications on the Design of Database Machines · SIGMOD Conference 1981
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
special-purpose processor
0.011981
The Effect of Target Applications on the Design of Database Machines · SIGMOD Conference 1981
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
database accelerator
0.011980
Database Machines · VLDB 1980

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

performance modeling · 0.0workload tracing · 0.0simulation · 0.0benchmarking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 Microprocessor Assisted Tuple Access, Decompression and Assembly for Statistical Database Systems
Paula B. Hawthorn
VLDB1
1982 Performance Analysis of Alternative Database Machine Architectures
abstract
The rapid advances in the development of low-cost computer hardware have led to many proposals for the use of this hardware to improve the performance of database management systems. Usually the design proposals are quite vague about the performance of the system with respect to a given data management application. In this paper we predict the performance of several of the proposed database management machines with respect to several representative INGRES queries. The systems analyzed in this paper include associative disks, RAP, CASSM, DBC, DIRECT, and CAFS. We demonstrate that no one database machine is best for executing all types of queries. We will also show that for one class of queries the degree of performance improvement achieved does not warrant use of a database machine.
Paula B. Hawthorn, David J. DeWitt
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
1981 The Effect of Target Applications on the Design of Database Machines
abstract
Specialized, single function processors can be built to be faster and cheaper than general purpose processors. Most database machines use such special purpose processors to manipulate data, with a general purpose managing processor to control the special purpose processors and perform utility functions. In this paper, the organization and use of these data manipulation processors is explored. Database machines are classified into single data manipulation processor systems, multiple disk-associated data manipulation processor systems, and multiple cache-associated processor systems. Examples of actual database machines are given for each category.Application types are classified into business, bibliographic search, and statistical analysis systems. A metric is developed to compare the performance of the categories of database machines with respect to the application types. The metric is the effective instruction rate, which is comparable to the instruction rate (millions of instructions per second) for conventional computers. It is shown that the effective instruction rate is highly sensitive to the proportion of work performed in the database machine's data manipulation processors. Therefore, determining the work that must be performed in the machine's managing processor is found to be important to determining the performance of the machine.Database machine performance for each category of database machines is compared for each type of application. It is shown that single processor systems are best for business applications; that disk-based multiple processor systems are best for bibliographic search applications; and that hybrid systems are best for statistical analysis applications. Therefore, the design of the organization of data manipulation processors is shown to be application-dependent.
Paula B. Hawthorn
SIGMOD Conference1
1981 A Performance Evaluation of Data Base Machine Architectures (Invited Paper)
David J. DeWitt, Paula B. Hawthorn
VLDB2
1980 Database Machines
Paula B. Hawthorn
VLDB1
1979 Performance Analysis of a Relational Data Base Management System
abstract
The effect on the performance of data management systems of the use of extended storage devices, multiple processors and prefetching data blocks is analyzed with respect to one system, INGRES. Benchmark query streams, derived from user queries, were run on the INGRES system and their CPU usage and data reference patterns traced. The results show that the performance characteristics of two query types: data-intensive queries and overhead-intensive queries, are so different that it may be difficult to design a single architecture to optimize the performance of both types. It is shown that the random access model of data references holds only for overhead-intensive queries, and then only if references to system catalogs are not considered data references. Significant sequentiality of reference was found in the data-intensive queries. It is shown that back-end data management machines that distribute processing toward the data may be cost effective only for data-intensive queries. It is proposed that the best method of distributing the processing of the overhead-intensive query is through the use of intelligent terminals. A third benchmark set, multi-relation queries, was devised, and proposals are made for taking advantage of the locality of reference which was found.
Paula B. Hawthorn, Michael Stonebraker
SIGMOD Conference1