Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yan Li 0074

dblp:87/660-74 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7605-1670ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 18%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
embedding learning
0.612022
Frequency-aware SGD for Efficient Embedding Learning with Provable Benefits · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.612022
Frequency-aware SGD for Efficient Embedding Learning with Provable Benefits · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.512021
Pessimism Meets Invariance: Provably Efficient Offline Mean-Field Multi-Agent RL · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.512021
Pessimism Meets Invariance: Provably Efficient Offline Mean-Field Multi-Agent RL · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming › value iteration
pessimistic value iteration
0.512021
Pessimism Meets Invariance: Provably Efficient Offline Mean-Field Multi-Agent RL · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.412020
Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent based Adversarial Training on Separable Data · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.412020
Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent based Adversarial Training on Separable Data · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › robust reinforcement learning
distributionally robust reinforcement learning
0.412020
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Robust and Smooth Policy · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.412020
Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent based Adversarial Training on Separable Data · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
implicit bias
0.412020
Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent based Adversarial Training on Separable Data · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.412020
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Robust and Smooth Policy · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.412020
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Robust and Smooth Policy · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.412019
Toward Understanding the Importance of Noise in Training Neural Networks · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization
0.412019
Toward Understanding the Importance of Noise in Training Neural Networks · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
spurious local minima
0.412019
Toward Understanding the Importance of Noise in Training Neural Networks · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.412019
Toward Understanding the Importance of Noise in Training Neural Networks · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 0.6frequency-aware sampling · 0.6value iteration · 0.5pessimism · 0.5permutation invariance · 0.5smoothness-inducing regularization · 0.4TRPO · 0.4DDPG · 0.4perturbed gradient descent · 0.4noise annealing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Noise Regularizes Over-parameterized Rank One Matrix Recovery, Provably
abstract
We investigate the role of noise in optimization algorithms for learning over-parameterized models. Specifically, we consider the recovery of a rank one matrix $Y^*\in R^{d\times d}$ from a noisy observation $Y$ using an over-parameterization model. Specifically, we parameterize the rank one matrix $Y^*$ by $XX^\top$, where $X\in R^{d\times d}$. We then show that under mild conditions, the estimator, obtained by the randomly perturbed gradient descent algorithm using the square loss function, attains a mean square error of $O(\sigma^2/d)$, where $\sigma^2$ is the variance of the observational noise. In contrast, the estimator obtained by gradient descent without random perturbation only attains a mean square error of $O(\sigma^2)$. Our result partially justifies the implicit regularization effect of noise when learning over-parameterized models, and provides new understanding of training over-parameterized neural networks.
Yan Li 0074, Enlu Zhou, Tuo Zhao
AISTATS2
2022 Frequency-aware SGD for Efficient Embedding Learning with Provable Benefits
Yan Li 0074, Dhruv Choudhary, Xiaohan Wei, Baichuan Yuan, Bhargav Bhushanam, Tuo Zhao, Guanghui Lan
ICLR1
2021 Noisy Gradient Descent Converges to Flat Minima for Nonconvex Matrix Factorization
abstract
Numerous empirical evidences have corroborated the importance of noise in nonconvex optimization problems. The theory behind such empirical observations, however, is still largely unknown. This paper studies this fundamental problem through investigating the nonconvex rectangular matrix factorization problem, which has infinitely many global minima due to rotation and scaling invariance. Hence, gradient descent (GD) can converge to any optimum, depending on the initialization. In contrast, we show that a perturbed form of GD with an arbitrary initialization converges to a global optimum that is uniquely determined by the injected noise. Our result implies that the noise imposes implicit bias towards certain optima. Numerical experiments are provided to support our theory.
Yan Li 0074, Song Wei, Enlu Zhou, Tuo Zhao
AISTATS2
2021 Pessimism Meets Invariance: Provably Efficient Offline Mean-Field Multi-Agent RL
abstract
Mean-Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MF-MARL) is attractive in the applications involving a large population of homogeneous agents, as it exploits the permutation invariance of agents and avoids the curse of many agents. Most existing results only focus on online settings, in which agents can interact with the environment during training. In some applications such as social welfare optimization, however, the interaction during training can be prohibitive or even unethical in the societal systems. To bridge such a gap, we propose a SAFARI (peSsimistic meAn-Field vAlue iteRatIon) algorithm for off-line MF-MARL, which only requires a handful of pre-collected experience data. Theoretically, under a weak coverage assumption that the experience dataset contains enough information about the optimal policy, we prove that for an episodic mean-field MDP with a horizon $H$ and $N$ training trajectories, SAFARI attains a sub-optimality gap of $\mathcal{O}(H^2d_{\rm eff} /\sqrt{N})$, where $d_{\rm eff}$ is the effective dimension of the function class for parameterizing the value function, but independent on the number of agents. Numerical experiments are provided.
Minshuo Chen, Yan Li 0074, Ethan Wang, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran Wang 0001, Tuo Zhao
NeurIPS2
2020 Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent based Adversarial Training on Separable Data
Yan Li 0074, Ethan X. Fang, Tuo Zhao
ICLR1
2020 Deep Reinforcement Learning with Robust and Smooth Policy
abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved great empirical successes in various domains. However, the large search space of neural networks requires a large amount of data, which makes the current RL algorithms not sample efficient. Motivated by the fact that many environments with continuous state space have smooth transitions, we propose to learn a smooth policy that behaves smoothly with respect to states. We develop a new framework — \textbf{S}mooth \textbf{R}egularized \textbf{R}einforcement \textbf{L}earning ($\textbf{SR}^2\textbf{L}$), where the policy is trained with smoothness-inducing regularization. Such regularization effectively constrains the search space, and enforces smoothness in the learned policy. Moreover, our proposed framework can also improve the robustness of policy against measurement error in the state space, and can be naturally extended to distribubutionally robust setting. We apply the proposed framework to both on-policy (TRPO) and off-policy algorithm (DDPG). Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our method achieves improved sample efficiency and robustness.
Qianli Shen, Yan Li 0074, Haoming Jiang, Zhaoran Wang 0001, Tuo Zhao
ICML2
2019 Toward Understanding the Importance of Noise in Training Neural Networks
abstract
Numerous empirical evidence has corroborated that the noise plays a crucial rule in effective and efficient training of deep neural networks. The theory behind, however, is still largely unknown. This paper studies this fundamental problem through training a simple two-layer convolutional neural network model. Although training such a network requires to solve a non-convex optimization problem with a spurious local optimum and a global optimum, we prove that a perturbed gradient descent algorithm in conjunction with noise annealing is guaranteed to converge to a global optimum in polynomial time with arbitrary initialization. This implies that the noise enables the algorithm to efficiently escape from the spurious local optimum. Numerical experiments are provided to support our theory.
Yan Li 0074, Dachao Lin, Enlu Zhou, Tuo Zhao
ICML3