Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kamil Bajda-Pawlikowski
dblp:87/7258
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Distributed and cloud data management · 68% Query processing and optimization · 16% Database system architecture and tuning · 14% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 38% High-performance computing · 33% Parallel and multicore computing · 29% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed and cloud data management › mapreduce
mapreduce and parallel database integration |
0.6 | 3 | 2019 | Integration of Large-Scale Data Processing Systems and Traditional Parallel Database Technology · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 HadoopDB in action: building real world applications · SIGMOD Conference 2010 HadoopDB: An Architectural Hybrid of MapReduce and DBMS Technologies for Analytical Workloads · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009 |
Distributed and cloud data management › mapreduce
hybrid SQL-MapReduce system |
0.5 | 2 | 2019 | Integration of Large-Scale Data Processing Systems and Traditional Parallel Database Technology · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 HadoopDB: An Architectural Hybrid of MapReduce and DBMS Technologies for Analytical Workloads · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009 |
Database system architecture and tuning
parallel database system |
0.2 | 2 | 2019 | Integration of Large-Scale Data Processing Systems and Traditional Parallel Database Technology · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 HadoopDB in action: building real world applications · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Query processing and optimization › query optimization › transformation-based optimization
query pushdown |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Efficient processing of data warehousing queries in a split execution environment · SIGMOD Conference 2011 |
Query processing and optimization
SQL query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Efficient processing of data warehousing queries in a split execution environment · SIGMOD Conference 2011 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster computing framework
mapreduce framework |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Efficient processing of data warehousing queries in a split execution environment · SIGMOD Conference 2011 |
Data mining
big data analytics |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | HadoopDB in action: building real world applications · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
High-performance computing
cluster computing |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | HadoopDB in action: building real world applications · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mapreduce · 0.8parallel database query processing · 0.6query pushdown · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Integration of Large-Scale Data Processing Systems and Traditional Parallel Database TechnologyabstractIn 2009 we explored the feasibility of building a hybrid SQL data analysis system that takes the best features from two competing technologies: large-scale data processing systems (such as Google MapReduce and Apache Hadoop) and parallel database management systems (such as Greenplum and Vertica). We built a prototype, HadoopDB, and demonstrated that it can deliver the high SQL query performance and efficiency of parallel database management systems while still providing the scalability, fault tolerance, and flexibility of large-scale data processing systems. Subsequently, HadoopDB grew into a commercial product, Hadapt, whose technology was eventually acquired by Teradata. In this paper, we provide an overview of HadoopDB's original design, and its evolution during the subsequent ten years of research and development effort. We describe how the project innovated both in the research lab, and as a commercial product at Hadapt and Teradata. We then discuss the current vibrant ecosystem of software projects (most of which are open source) that continued HadoopDB's legacy of implementing a systems level integration of large-scale data processing systems and parallel database technology. Azza Abouzeid, Daniel J. Abadi, Kamil Bajda-Pawlikowski, Avi Silberschatz |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |
| 2011 | Efficient processing of data warehousing queries in a split execution environmentabstractHadapt is a start-up company currently commercializing the Yale University research project called HadoopDB. The company focuses on building a platform for Big Data analytics in the cloud by introducing a storage layer optimized for structured data and by providing a framework for executing SQL queries efficiently. This work considers processing data warehousing queries over very large datasets. Our goal is to maximize perfor mance while, at the same time, not giving up fault tolerance and scalability. We analyze the complexity of this problem in the split execution environment of HadoopDB. Here, incoming queries are examined; parts of the query are pushed down and executed inside the higher performing database layer; and the rest of the query is processed in a more generic MapReduce framework. Kamil Bajda-Pawlikowski, Daniel J. Abadi, Avi Silberschatz, Erik Paulson 0001 |
SIGMOD Conference | 1 |
| 2010 | HadoopDB in action: building real world applicationsabstractHadoopDB is a hybrid of MapReduce and DBMS technologies, designed to meet the growing demand of analyzing massive datasets on very large clusters of machines. Our previous work has shown that HadoopDB approaches parallel databases in performance and still yields the scalability and fault tolerance of MapReduce-based systems. In this demonstration, we focus on HadoopDB's flexible architecture and versatility with two real world application scenarios: a semantic web data application for protein sequence analysis and a business data warehousing application based on TPC-H. The demonstration offers a thorough walk-through of how to easily build applications on top of HadoopDB. Azza Abouzeid, Kamil Bajda-Pawlikowski, Jiewen Huang, Daniel J. Abadi, Avi Silberschatz |
SIGMOD Conference | 2 |
| 2009 | HadoopDB: An Architectural Hybrid of MapReduce and DBMS Technologies for Analytical WorkloadsabstractThe production environment for analytical data management applications is rapidly changing. Many enterprises are shifting away from deploying their analytical databases on high-end proprietary machines, and moving towards cheaper, lower-end, commodity hardware, typically arranged in a shared-nothing MPP architecture, often in a virtualized environment inside public or private "clouds". At the same time, the amount of data that needs to be analyzed is exploding, requiring hundreds to thousands of machines to work in parallel to perform the analysis. There tend to be two schools of thought regarding what technology to use for data analysis in such an environment. Proponents of parallel databases argue that the strong emphasis on performance and efficiency of parallel databases makes them well-suited to perform such analysis. On the other hand, others argue that MapReduce-based systems are better suited due to their superior scalability, fault tolerance, and flexibility to handle unstructured data. In this paper, we explore the feasibility of building a hybrid system that takes the best features from both technologies; the prototype we built approaches parallel databases in performance and efficiency, yet still yields the scalability, fault tolerance, and flexibility of MapReduce-based systems. Azza Abouzeid, Kamil Bajda-Pawlikowski, Daniel J. Abadi, Alexander Rasin, Avi Silberschatz |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |