Sebastian Schuon

dblp:87/7658 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 68% Geometric modeling and processing · 32%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction
0.212013
Algorithms for 3D Shape Scanning with a Depth Camera · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013
Computational photography and imaging
3d scanning
0.212013
Algorithms for 3D Shape Scanning with a Depth Camera · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013
Computational photography and imaging
time-of-flight imaging
0.122013
LidarBoost: Depth superresolution for ToF 3D shape scanning · CVPR 2009
Algorithms for 3D Shape Scanning with a Depth Camera · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.112010
3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera · CVPR 2010
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
3d scanning
0.112010
3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera · CVPR 2010
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.112009
LidarBoost: Depth superresolution for ToF 3D shape scanning · CVPR 2009
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
depth super-resolution
0.112009
LidarBoost: Depth superresolution for ToF 3D shape scanning · CVPR 2009
Computational photography and imaging › time-of-flight imaging
time-of-flight depth sensing
0.012010
3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera · CVPR 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic scan alignment · 0.4filtering · 0.43d superresolution · 0.4optimization with data fidelity and geometry prior · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Algorithms for 3D Shape Scanning with a Depth Camera
abstract
We describe a method for 3D object scanning by aligning depth scans that were taken from around an object with a Time-of-Flight (ToF) camera. These ToF cameras can measure depth scans at video rate. Due to comparably simple technology, they bear potential for economical production in big volumes. Our easy-to-use, cost-effective scanning solution, which is based on such a sensor, could make 3D scanning technology more accessible to everyday users. The algorithmic challenge we face is that the sensor's level of random noise is substantial and there is a nontrivial systematic bias. In this paper, we show the surprising result that 3D scans of reasonable quality can also be obtained with a sensor of such low data quality. Established filtering and scan alignment techniques from the literature fail to achieve this goal. In contrast, our algorithm is based on a new combination of a 3D superresolution method with a probabilistic scan alignment approach that explicitly takes into account the sensor's noise characteristics.
Yan Cui 0011, Sebastian Schuon, Sebastian Thrun, Didier Stricker, Christian Theobalt
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2010 3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera
abstract
We describe a method for 3D object scanning by aligning depth scans that were taken from around an object with a time-of-flight camera. These ToF cameras can measure depth scans at video rate. Due to comparably simple technology they bear potential for low cost production in big volumes. Our easy-to-use, cost-effective scanning solution based on such a sensor could make 3D scanning technology more accessible to everyday users. The algorithmic challenge we face is that the sensor's level of random noise is substantial and there is a non-trivial systematic bias. In this paper we show the surprising result that 3D scans of reasonable quality can also be obtained with a sensor of such low data quality. Established filtering and scan alignment techniques from the literature fail to achieve this goal. In contrast, our algorithm is based on a new combination of a 3D superresolution method with a probabilistic scan alignment approach that explicitly takes into account the sensor's noise characteristics.
Yan Cui 0011, Sebastian Schuon, Derek Chan, Sebastian Thrun, Christian Theobalt
CVPR2
2009 LidarBoost: Depth superresolution for ToF 3D shape scanning
abstract
Depth maps captured with time-of-flight cameras have very low data quality: the image resolution is rather limited and the level of random noise contained in the depth maps is very high. Therefore, such flash lidars cannot be used out of the box for high-quality 3D object scanning. To solve this problem, we present LidarBoost, a 3D depth superresolution method that combines several low resolution noisy depth images of a static scene from slightly displaced viewpoints, and merges them into a high-resolution depth image. We have developed an optimization framework that uses a data fidelity term and a geometry prior term that is tailored to the specific characteristics of flash lidars. We demonstrate both visually and quantitatively that LidarBoost produces better results than previous methods from the literature.
Sebastian Schuon, Christian Theobalt, James Davis 0001, Sebastian Thrun
CVPR1