EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sebastian Schuon
dblp:87/7658
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Computational photography and imaging · 68% Geometric modeling and processing · 32% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Algorithms for 3D Shape Scanning with a Depth Camera · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 |
Computational photography and imaging
3d scanning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Algorithms for 3D Shape Scanning with a Depth Camera · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 |
Computational photography and imaging
time-of-flight imaging |
0.1 | 2 | 2013 | LidarBoost: Depth superresolution for ToF 3D shape scanning · CVPR 2009 Algorithms for 3D Shape Scanning with a Depth Camera · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | 3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera · CVPR 2010 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
3d scanning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | 3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera · CVPR 2010 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | LidarBoost: Depth superresolution for ToF 3D shape scanning · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
depth super-resolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | LidarBoost: Depth superresolution for ToF 3D shape scanning · CVPR 2009 |
Computational photography and imaging › time-of-flight imaging
time-of-flight depth sensing |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | 3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera · CVPR 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic scan alignment · 0.4filtering · 0.43d superresolution · 0.4optimization with data fidelity and geometry prior · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Algorithms for 3D Shape Scanning with a Depth CameraabstractWe describe a method for 3D object scanning by aligning depth scans that were taken from around an object with a Time-of-Flight (ToF) camera. These ToF cameras can measure depth scans at video rate. Due to comparably simple technology, they bear potential for economical production in big volumes. Our easy-to-use, cost-effective scanning solution, which is based on such a sensor, could make 3D scanning technology more accessible to everyday users. The algorithmic challenge we face is that the sensor's level of random noise is substantial and there is a nontrivial systematic bias. In this paper, we show the surprising result that 3D scans of reasonable quality can also be obtained with a sensor of such low data quality. Established filtering and scan alignment techniques from the literature fail to achieve this goal. In contrast, our algorithm is based on a new combination of a 3D superresolution method with a probabilistic scan alignment approach that explicitly takes into account the sensor's noise characteristics. Yan Cui 0011, Sebastian Schuon, Sebastian Thrun, Didier Stricker, Christian Theobalt |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2010 | 3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight cameraabstractWe describe a method for 3D object scanning by aligning depth scans that were taken from around an object with a time-of-flight camera. These ToF cameras can measure depth scans at video rate. Due to comparably simple technology they bear potential for low cost production in big volumes. Our easy-to-use, cost-effective scanning solution based on such a sensor could make 3D scanning technology more accessible to everyday users. The algorithmic challenge we face is that the sensor's level of random noise is substantial and there is a non-trivial systematic bias. In this paper we show the surprising result that 3D scans of reasonable quality can also be obtained with a sensor of such low data quality. Established filtering and scan alignment techniques from the literature fail to achieve this goal. In contrast, our algorithm is based on a new combination of a 3D superresolution method with a probabilistic scan alignment approach that explicitly takes into account the sensor's noise characteristics. Yan Cui 0011, Sebastian Schuon, Derek Chan, Sebastian Thrun, Christian Theobalt |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2009 | LidarBoost: Depth superresolution for ToF 3D shape scanningabstractDepth maps captured with time-of-flight cameras have very low data quality: the image resolution is rather limited and the level of random noise contained in the depth maps is very high. Therefore, such flash lidars cannot be used out of the box for high-quality 3D object scanning. To solve this problem, we present LidarBoost, a 3D depth superresolution method that combines several low resolution noisy depth images of a static scene from slightly displaced viewpoints, and merges them into a high-resolution depth image. We have developed an optimization framework that uses a data fidelity term and a geometry prior term that is tailored to the specific characteristics of flash lidars. We demonstrate both visually and quantitatively that LidarBoost produces better results than previous methods from the literature. Sebastian Schuon, Christian Theobalt, James Davis 0001, Sebastian Thrun |
CVPR | 1 |