Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John M. Burke
dblp:87/8248
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-1412-5539ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Transposome: a toolkit for annotation of transposable element families from unassembled sequence reads · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
transposable element annotation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Transposome: a toolkit for annotation of transposable element families from unassembled sequence reads · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
whole-genome shotgun sequencing analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Transposome: a toolkit for annotation of transposable element families from unassembled sequence readsabstractMOTIVATION: Transposable elements (TEs) can be found in virtually all eukaryotic genomes and have the potential to produce evolutionary novelty. Despite the broad taxonomic distribution of TEs, the evolutionary history of these sequences is largely unknown for many taxa due to a lack of genomic resources and identification methods. Given that most TE annotation methods are designed to work on genome assemblies, we sought to develop a method to provide a fine-grained classification of TEs from DNA sequence reads. Here, we present a toolkit for the efficient annotation of TE families from low-coverage whole-genome shotgun (WGS) data, enabling the rapid identification of TEs in a large number of taxa. We compared our software, Transposome, with other approaches for annotating repeats from WGS data, and we show that it offers significant improvements in run time and produces more precise estimates of genomic repeat abundance. Transposome may also be used as a general toolkit for working with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) data, and for constructing custom genome analysis pipelines. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code for Transposome is freely available (http://sestaton.github.io/Transposome), implemented in Perl and is supported on Linux. S. Evan Staton, John M. Burke |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2010 | Systematic calibration of a cell signaling network modelabstractBACKGROUND: Mathematical modeling is being applied to increasingly complex biological systems and datasets; however, the process of analyzing and calibrating against experimental data is often challenging and a rate limiting step in model development. To address this problem, we developed a systematic methodology for calibrating quantitative models of dynamic biological processes and illustrate its utility by validating a model of TRAIL (Tumor necrosis factor Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand)-induced cell death. RESULTS: We propose a serial framework integrating analysis and calibration modules and we compare various methods for global sensitivity analysis and global parameter estimation. First, adequacy of the network structure is checked by global sensitivity analysis to changes in concentrations of molecular species, validating that the model can reproduce qualitative features of the system behavior derived from experiments or literature surveys. Second, rate parameters are ranked by importance using gradient-based and variance-based sensitivity indices, and we systematically determine the optimal number of parameters to include in model calibration. Third, deterministic, stochastic and hybrid algorithms for global optimization are applied to estimate the values of the most important parameters by fitting to time series data. We compare the performance of these three optimization algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed framework covers the entire process from validating a proto-model to establishing a realistic model for in silico experiments and thereby provides a generalized workflow for the construction of predictive models of complex network systems. Kyoung Ae Kim, Sabrina L. Spencer, John G. Albeck, John M. Burke, Peter K. Sorger, Suzanne Gaudet |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |