Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel M. Kuchta
dblp:87/929
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Optical networks · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Optical networks › fiber optic local area network
fiber-optic bus network |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Computer Modeling and Simulation of the Optoelectronic Technology Consortium (OETC) Optical Bus · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Computer Modeling and Simulation of the Optoelectronic Technology Consortium (OETC) Optical Bus · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quasi-analytical simulation · 0.0block-oriented simulation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Bandwidth Scaling for AI Interconnect - More Wavelengths versusMore Fiber?abstractWith AI model size doubling every four months, the size of AI compute clusters is growing rapidly to keep up. Traditional data center front-end networks rely on optical interconnect for data movement with Terabits per second of connectivity and have been doubling data rate every 4 years. As the models grow it is also expected that the back-end GPU networks expand beyond the confines of the rack. Optical interconnects will be needed at distances of tens of meters with 10Tb/s data transfer rates and doubling every 2 years will be expected. How should optical interconnects best achieve this bandwidth increase and what is the best performance axis to push next? In this panel discussion we pose the question - “Is it better to scale with more wavelengths or by adding more fibers?” Join us to see if any of the panelists can convince you they have the right approach. Katharine Schmidtke, Daniel M. Kuchta, Peter J. Winzer, Rebecca Schaevitz, Amit Nagra, Alan Liu, Bardia Pezeshki |
HOTI | 2 |
| 1997 | Computer Modeling and Simulation of the Optoelectronic Technology Consortium (OETC) Optical BusabstractThe Optoelectronic Technology Consortium (OETC) 16 Gbit/s, 32-channel parallel fiber optic bus introduces new requirements for modeling and simulation of an optical bus which were not present for previous single-channel optical link systems. These requirements include the simulation of the statistical variation in component parameters, timing skew, and crosstalk. Due to the required simulation of statistical variation in component parameters, a time efficient simulation approach such as the quasi-analytical simulation methodology is vital. In addition, the adoption of a block-oriented simulation environment facilitates mixed-level simulation which minimizes the computational requirements of the bus simulation while achieving the required accuracy in the simulation of all bus components. Simulation results indicate that while noise is not a limiting factor in the performance of the optical bus, timing skew, and device uniformity across the channels of the bus are the most important factors for satisfactory performance. Experimental measurements confirm these simulation results. Brent K. Whitlock, Petar K. Pepeljugoski, Daniel M. Kuchta, John D. Crow |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 3 |