Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew D. J. Cross

dblp:88/1501 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 8 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
3D vision · 53% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 29% Graph learning · 18%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 36% Geometric modeling and processing · 32% Image and video processing · 32%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 57% Algorithms and data structures · 43%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization
0.021998
Graph Matching With a Dual-Step EM Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Recovering Perspective Pose with a Dual Step EM Algorithm · NIPS 1997
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching
geometric matching
0.011998
Graph Matching With a Dual-Step EM Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph matching
0.011998
Graph Matching With a Dual-Step EM Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
0.011998
Graph Matching With a Dual-Step EM Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Computer vision › 3D vision
object matching
0.011998
Holistic Matching · ECCV (2) 1998
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud registration
transformation estimation
0.011998
Graph Matching With a Dual-Step EM Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia retrieval › content-based retrieval
shape retrieval
0.011998
Graph Matching for Shape Retrieval · NIPS 1998
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera pose estimation
perspective pose estimation
0.011997
Recovering Perspective Pose with a Dual Step EM Algorithm · NIPS 1997
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.011997
Recovering Perspective Pose with a Dual Step EM Algorithm · NIPS 1997
Image and video processing
edge detection
0.011997
Scale-Space Vector Fields for Feature Analysis · CVPR 1997
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis
symmetry detection
0.011997
Scale-Space Vector Fields for Feature Analysis · CVPR 1997
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph matching
structural matching
0.011996
Genetic Search for Structural Matching · ECCV (1) 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision
shape matching
0.011998
Holistic Matching · ECCV (2) 1998
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph matching
0.011998
Graph Matching for Shape Retrieval · NIPS 1998
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation
0.011997
Recovering Perspective Pose with a Dual Step EM Algorithm · NIPS 1997
Algorithms and data structures
search algorithms
0.011996
Genetic Search for Structural Matching · ECCV (1) 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph matching · 0.0genetic search · 0.0mixture model · 0.0holistic matching · 0.0expectation-maximization · 0.0bipartite graph matching · 0.0vector field analysis · 0.0scale-space representation · 0.0magneto-static analogy · 0.0EM algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Convergence of a hill-climbing genetic algorithm for graph matching
Andrew D. J. Cross, Richard Myers, Edwin R. Hancock
Pattern Recognit.1
1999 Scale space vector fields for symmetry detection
Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
Image Vis. Comput.1
1999 Corner detection via topographic analysis of vector-potential
Bin Luo 0001, Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2
1998 Corner Detection Via Topographic Analysis of Vector Potential
abstract
Abstract This paper describes how corner detection can be realised using a new feature representation based on a magneto-static analogy. The idea is to compute a vector-potential by appealing to an analogy in which the Canny edge-map is regarded as an elementary current density residing on the image plane. In this paper, we demonstrate that corners are located at the saddle-points of the magnitude of the vector-potential. These points correspond to the intersections of saddle-ridge and saddle-valley structures, i.e. to junctions of the edge and symmetry lines. We describe a template-based method for locating the saddle-points. This involves performing a non-minimum suppression test in the direction of the vector-potential and a non-maximum suppression test in the orthogonal direction. Experimental results using both synthetic and real images are given. We investigate the angle and scale sensitivity of the new corner detector and compare it with a number of alternative corner detectors.
Bin Luo 0001, Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
BMVC2
1998 Holistic Matching
Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
ECCV (2)1
1998 Edge Location with Electrostatic Region Attractors
abstract
This paper describes physically based model for detecting closed edge-contours. According to our model, the magnitude of the Canny edge-gradient represents a raw charge-density. Edge segmentation is realised by considering the damped-motion of charged test-particles in the resulting electric field. The attractor regions of the electric field represent continuous regions that are separated by closed edge-contours. In order to strike a compromise between over and under smoothing the resulting edge-map, we provide a hierarchical algorithm for controlling the dynamics of the region attractors. We illustrate the method on both synthetic and real world data.
Richard C. Wilson 0001, Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
ICIP (2)2
1998 Corner detection using vector potential
abstract
This paper describes how corner detection can be realised using a new feature representation that has recently been successfully exploited for edge and symmetry detection. The feature representation based on an magneto-static analogy. The idea is to compute a vector potential by appealing to an analogy in which the Canny edge-map is regarded as an elementary current density residing on the image plane. In our previous work we demonstrated that edges are the local maxima of the vector potential while points of symmetry correspond to the local minimum. In this paper we demonstrate that corners are located at the saddle points of the magnitude of the vector potential. These points corresponds to the intersections of saddle-ridge and saddle-valley structures, i.e. to junctions of the edge and symmetry lines. We describe a template-based method for locating the saddle-points. This involves performing a nonminimum suppression test in the direction of the vector potential and a nonmaximum suppression test in the orthogonal direction. Experimental results of both synthetic and real images are given.
Bin Luo 0001, Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
ICPR2
1998 Graph Matching for Shape Retrieval
Benoit Huet, Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
NIPS2
1998 Structural Matching with Active Triangulations
Richard C. Wilson 0001, Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.2
1998 Graph Matching With a Dual-Step EM Algorithm
abstract
This paper describes a new approach to matching geometric structure in 2D point-sets. The novel feature is to unify the tasks of estimating transformation geometry and identifying point-correspondence matches. Unification is realized by constructing a mixture model over the bipartite graph representing the correspondence match and by affecting optimization using the EM algorithm. According to our EM framework, the probabilities of structural correspondence gate contributions to the expected likelihood function used to estimate maximum likelihood transformation parameters. These gating probabilities measure the consistency of the matched neighborhoods in the graphs. The recovery of transformational geometry and hard correspondence matches are interleaved and are realized by applying coupled update operations to the expected log-likelihood function. We evaluate the technique on two real-world problems.
Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1997 Scale-Space Vector Fields for Feature Analysis
abstract
This paper describes a vectorial representation that can be used to assess the symmetry of objects in 2D images. The method exploits a magneto-static analogy. Commencing from the gradient-field extracted from filtered grey-scale images we construct a vector-potential. Our magneto-static analogy is that tangential gradient vectors represent the elements of a current distribution on the image plane. By embedding the image plane in an augmented 3-dimensional space, we compute the vector potential by performing volume integration over the current distribution. The associated magnetic field is computed by taking the curl of the vector-potential. The auxiliary spatial dimension provides a natural scale-space sampling of the generating current distribution; as the height above the image plane is increased, so the volume over which averaging is effected also increases. We extract edge and symmetry lines through a topographic analysis of the vector-field at various heights above the image plane. Symmetry axes are lines where the curl of the vector-potential vanishes; at edges the divergence of the vector-potential vanishes.
Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
CVPR1
1997 Recovering Perspective Pose with a Dual Step EM Algorithm
Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
NIPS1
1997 Inexact graph matching using genetic search
Andrew D. J. Cross, Richard C. Wilson 0001, Edwin R. Hancock
Pattern Recognit.1
1996 Genetic Search for Structural Matching
Andrew D. J. Cross, Richard C. Wilson 0001, Edwin R. Hancock
ECCV (1)1
1996 Sensitivity analysis for structural matching
abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the sensitivity of relational matching to attribute and structural information. Broadly speaking there are two main aspects to this study. First, we determine the relative importance of attribute and structural information in matching noise corrupted graphs. The second aspect of our analysis concerns the nature of the relational structures used in matching. Here we compare the matching results obtained using four different graph structures, namely the Delaunay graph, the N-nearest neighbour graph, the Gabriel graph and the relative neighbourhood graph. Our results are presented as noise sensitivity curves. The main conclusion of the study is that attributes are essential when the fractional corruption exceeds 20% and that the Delaunay graph has optimal noise robustness.
Richard C. Wilson 0001, Andrew D. J. Cross, Edwin R. Hancock
ICPR2