Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julien M. Hendrickx

dblp:88/6313 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8214-8292ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%
Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 53% Hardware security and side channels · 47%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 41% Information theory · 41% Distributed computing theory · 18%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
bradley-terry-luce model
0.822020
Minimax Rate for Learning From Pairwise Comparisons in the BTL Model · ICML 2020
Graph Resistance and Learning from Pairwise Comparisons · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
pairwise learning
0.822020
Minimax Rate for Learning From Pairwise Comparisons in the BTL Model · ICML 2020
Graph Resistance and Learning from Pairwise Comparisons · ICML 2019
Privacy and data protection › query privacy
query obfuscation
0.712023
Web Privacy: A Formal Adversarial Model for Query Obfuscation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2023
Information theory › estimation theory › minimax estimation
minimax rate
0.412020
Minimax Rate for Learning From Pairwise Comparisons in the BTL Model · ICML 2020
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel leakage
leakage certification
0.412019
Leakage Certification Revisited: Bounding Model Errors in Side-Channel Security Evaluations · CRYPTO (1) 2019
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack
0.412019
Leakage Certification Revisited: Bounding Model Errors in Side-Channel Security Evaluations · CRYPTO (1) 2019
Privacy and data protection
web privacy
0.212023
Web Privacy: A Formal Adversarial Model for Query Obfuscation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2023
Distributed computing theory
distributed graph algorithms
0.212014
Views in a Graph: To Which Depth Must Equality Be Checked? · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2014
Graph algorithms and graph theory › metric graph theory
graph diameter
0.112014
Views in a Graph: To Which Depth Must Equality Be Checked? · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bradley-terry-luce model · 1.6weighted least squares · 0.9noisy comparisons · 0.8hypothesis testing · 0.7formal modeling · 0.7combinatorial analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Web Privacy: A Formal Adversarial Model for Query Obfuscation
abstract
The queries we perform, the searches we make, and the websites we visit – this sensitive data is collected at scale by companies as part of the services they provide. Query obfuscation, intertwining the genuine queries of the user with artificial queries, has been proposed as a solution to protect the privacy of individuals on the web.We here present a formal model and formulate through attack models three privacy requirements for obfuscators: (1)indistinguishability, that the user query should be hard to identify; (2)coverage, that its topic should be hard to identify; and (3)imprecision, that the query should still be hard to identify for an attacker with additional auxiliary information. The latter is needed to make the former two guarantees “future-proof”. Using our framework, we derive two important results for obfuscators. First, we show that indistinguishability imposes strong bounds on the coverage and imprecision achievable by an obfuscator. Second, we prove an important tradeoff between coverage and imprecision, which inherently limits the strength and robustness of the privacy guarantees that an obfuscator can provide. We then introduce a family of obfuscators with provable indistinguishability guarantees, which we callk–ball obfuscators, and show, for a range of parameter values, the achievable coverage and imprecision. We show empirically that our theoretical tradeoff holds, and that its bound is not tight in practice: even in a simple idealized setting, there is a significant gap between practical coverage and imprecision guarantees, and the optimal bounds. While obfuscators have proven popular with the general public, all obfuscators currently available provide adhoc guarantees, and have been shown to be vulnerable to attacks, putting the data of users at risk. We hope this work to be a first step towards a robust evaluation of the properties of query obfuscators and the development of principled obfuscators.
Florimond Houssiau, Thibaut Liénart, Julien M. Hendrickx, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.3
2020 Minimax Rank-$1$ Matrix Factorization
abstract
We consider the problem of recovering a rank-one matrix when a perturbed subset of its entries is revealed. We propose a method based on least squares in the log-space and show its performance matches the lower bounds that we derive for this problem in the small-perturbation regime, which are related to the spectral gap of a graph representing the revealed entries. Unfortunately, we show that for larger disturbances, potentially exponentially growing errors are unavoidable for any consistent recovery method. We then propose a second algorithm relying on encoding the matrix factorization in the stationary distribution of a certain Markov chain. We show that, under the stronger assumption of known upper and lower bounds on the entries of the true matrix, this second method does not have exponential error growth for large disturbances. Both algorithms can be implemented in nearly linear time.
Venkatesh Saligrama, Alexander Olshevsky, Julien M. Hendrickx
AISTATS3
2020 Gaussian process regression for the estimation of stable univariate time-series processes
Georgios Birpoutsoukis, Julien M. Hendrickx
ESANN2
2020 Minimax Rate for Learning From Pairwise Comparisons in the BTL Model
abstract
We consider the problem of learning the qualities w_1, ... , w_n of a collection of items by performing noisy comparisons among them. We assume there is a fixed “comparison graph” and every neighboring pair of items is compared k times. We will study the popular Bradley-Terry-Luce model, where the probability that item i wins a comparison against j equals w_i/(w_i + w_j). We are interested in how the expected error in estimating the vector w = (w_1, ... , w_n) behaves in the regime when the number of comparisons k is large. Our contribution is the determination of the minimax rate up to a constant factor. We show that this rate is achieved by a simple algorithm based on weighted least squares, with weights determined from the empirical outcomes of the comparisons. This algorithm can be implemented in nearly linear time in the total number of comparisons.
Julien M. Hendrickx, Alexander Olshevsky, Venkatesh Saligrama
ICML1
2019 Leakage Certification Revisited: Bounding Model Errors in Side-Channel Security Evaluations
Olivier Bronchain, Julien M. Hendrickx, Clément Massart, Alexander Olshevsky, François-Xavier Standaert
CRYPTO (1)2
2019 Graph Resistance and Learning from Pairwise Comparisons
abstract
We consider the problem of learning the qualities of a collection of items by performing noisy comparisons among them. Following the standard paradigm, we assume there is a fixed “comparison graph” and every neighboring pair of items in this graph is compared k times according to the Bradley-Terry-Luce model (where the probability than an item wins a comparison is proportional the item quality). We are interested in how the relative error in quality estimation scales with the comparison graph in the regime where k is large. We show that, asymptotically, the relevant graph-theoretic quantity is the square root of the resistance of the comparison graph. Specifically, we provide an algorithm with relative error decay that scales with the square root of the graph resistance, and provide a lower bound showing that (up to log factors) a better scaling is impossible. The performance guarantee of our algorithm, both in terms of the graph and the skewness of the item quality distribution, significantly outperforms earlier results.
Julien M. Hendrickx, Alexander Olshevsky, Venkatesh Saligrama
ICML1
2017 Piecewise-Bézier C1 smoothing on manifolds with application to wind field estimation
Pierre-Yves Gousenbourger, Estelle M. Massart, Antoni Musolas, Pierre-Antoine Absil, Julien M. Hendrickx, Laurent Jacques, Youssef Marzouk 0001
ESANN5
2016 Extending a two-variable mean to a multi-variable mean
Estelle M. Massart, Julien M. Hendrickx, Pierre-Antoine Absil
ESANN2
2014 JSR: a toolbox to compute the joint spectral radius
abstract
We present a toolbox for computing the Joint Spectral Radius of a set of matrices, i.e., the maximal asymptotic growth rate of products of matrices taken in that set. The Joint Spectral Radius has a wide range of applications, including switched and hybrid systems, combinatorial words theory, or the study of wavelets. However, it is notoriously difficult to compute or approximate; it is actually uncomputable, and its approximation is NP-hard. The toolbox compiles several recent computation and approximation methods, and also contains an automatic blackbox method for inexperienced users, selecting the most appropriate methods based on an automatic study of the matrix set provided. The tool is implemented in Matlab and is freely downloadable (with documentation and demos) from Matlab Central1.
Guillaume Vankeerberghen, Julien M. Hendrickx, Raphaël M. Jungers
HSCC2
2014 Views in a Graph: To Which Depth Must Equality Be Checked?
abstract
The view of depth k of a node is a tree containing all the walks of length k leaving that node. Views contain all the information that nodes could obtain by exchanging messages with their neighbors. In particular, a value can be computed by a node on a network using a distributed deterministic algorithm if and only if that value only depends on the node's view of the network. Norris has proved that if two nodes have the same view of depth n - 1, they have the same views for all depths. Taking the diameter d into account, we prove a new bound in O(d + d log(n/d)) instead of n - 1 for bidirectional graphs with port numbering, which are natural models in distributed computation. This automatically improves various results relying on Norris's bound. We also provide a bound that is stronger for certain colored graphs and extend our results to graphs containing directed edges.
Julien M. Hendrickx
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1