Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fan Wang 0041
dblp:88/898-41
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 48% Efficient and distributed learning · 36% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program synthesis and code generation · 79% Services computing and microservices · 21% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model fine-tuning
knowledge-aware fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | KaSA: Knowledge-Aware Singular-Value Adaptation of Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LlamaDuo: LLMOps Pipeline for Seamless Migration from Service LLMs to Small-Scale Local LLMs · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
language model architecture |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LlamaDuo: LLMOps Pipeline for Seamless Migration from Service LLMs to Small-Scale Local LLMs · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model adaptation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | KaSA: Knowledge-Aware Singular-Value Adaptation of Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
model scaling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | KaSA: Knowledge-Aware Singular-Value Adaptation of Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.7singular value decomposition · 0.9mixture of experts · 0.9conditional computation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | A Survey on Large Language Models for Code GenerationabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have garnered remarkable advancements across diverse code-related tasks, known as Code LLMs, particularly in code generation that generates source code with LLM from natural language descriptions. This burgeoning field has captured significant interest from both academic researchers and industry professionals due to its practical significance in software development, e.g., GitHub Copilot . Despite the active exploration of LLMs for a variety of code tasks, either from the perspective of Natural Language Processing (NLP) or Software Engineering (SE) or both, there is a noticeable absence of a comprehensive and up-to-date literature review dedicated to LLM for code generation. In this survey, we aim to bridge this gap by providing a systematic literature review that serves as a valuable reference for researchers investigating the cutting-edge progress in LLMs for code generation. We introduce a taxonomy to categorize and discuss the recent developments in LLMs for code generation, covering aspects such as data curation, latest advances, performance evaluation, ethical implications, environmental impact, and real-world applications. In addition, we present a historical overview of the evolution of LLMs for code generation and provide a quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis of experimental results of code LLMs, sourced from their original papers to ensure a fair comparison on the HumanEval, MBPP, and BigCodeBench benchmarks, across various levels of difficulty and types of programming tasks, to highlight the progressive enhancements in LLM capabilities for code generation. We identify critical challenges and promising opportunities regarding the gap between academia and practical development. Furthermore, we have established a dedicated resource GitHub page ( https://github.com/juyongjiang/CodeLLMSurvey ) to continuously document and disseminate the most recent advances in the field. Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang 0041, Jiasi Shen 0001, Sungju Kim, Sung Hun Kim 0003 |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 2 |
| 2025 | LlamaDuo: LLMOps Pipeline for Seamless Migration from Service LLMs to Small-Scale Local LLMsabstractThe widespread adoption of cloud-based proprietary large language models (LLMs) has introduced significant challenges, including operational dependencies, privacy concerns, and the necessity of continuous internet connectivity.In this work, we introduce an LLMOps pipeline, "LlamaDuo", for the seamless migration of knowledge and abilities from serviceoriented LLMs to smaller, locally manageable models.This pipeline is crucial for ensuring service continuity in the presence of operational failures, strict privacy policies, or offline requirements.Our LlamaDuo involves fine-tuning a small language model against the service LLM using a synthetic dataset generated by the latter.If the performance of the fine-tuned model falls short of expectations, it is automatically improved through additional fine-tuning using extra similar data generated by the service LLM.This multi-turn process guarantees that the smaller model can eventually match or even surpass the service LLM's capabilities in specific downstream tasks, offering a practical and scalable solution for managing AI deployments in constrained environments.Extensive experiments with leadingedge LLMs are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness, adaptability, and affordability of LlamaDuo across various downstream tasks.Our pipeline implementation is available at https://github.com/deep-diver/llamaduo. Chansung Park, Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang 0041, Sayak Paul, Jing Tang 0004 |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | KaSA: Knowledge-Aware Singular-Value Adaptation of Large Language ModelsabstractThe increasing sizes of large language models (LLMs) result in significant computational overhead and memory usage when adapting these models to specific tasks or domains. Various parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods have been devised to mitigate these challenges by training a small set of parameters for the task-specific updates of the model weights. Among PEFT methods, LoRA stands out for its simplicity and efficiency, inspiring the development of a series of variants. However, LoRA and its successors disregard the knowledge that is noisy or irrelevant to the targeted task, detrimentally impacting model performance and leading to suboptimality. To address this limitation, we introduce Knowledge-aware Singular-value Adaptation (KaSA), a PEFT method that leverages singular value decomposition (SVD) with knowledge-aware singular values to dynamically activate knowledge based on its relevance to the task at hand. We conduct extensive experiments across a range of LLMs on tasks spanning natural language understanding (NLU), generation (NLG), instruction following, and commonsense reasoning. The experimental results demonstrate that KaSA consistently outperforms FFT and 14 popular PEFT baselines across 16 benchmarks and 4 synthetic datasets, underscoring our method's efficacy and adaptability. The source code of our method is available at https://github.com/juyongjiang/KaSA. Fan Wang 0041, Juyong Jiang, Chansung Park, Sunghun Kim 0001, Jing Tang 0004 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language ModelsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have garnered unprecedented advancements across diverse fields, ranging from natural language processing to computer vision and beyond. The prowess of LLMs is underpinned by their substantial model size, extensive and diverse datasets, and the vast computational power harnessed during training, all of which contribute to the emergent abilities of LLMs (e.g., in-context learning) that are not present in small models. Within this context, the mixture of experts (MoE) has emerged as an effective method for substantially scaling up model capacity with minimal computation overhead, gaining significant attention from academia and industry. Despite its growing prevalence, there lacks a systematic and comprehensive review of the literature on MoE. This survey seeks to bridge that gap, serving as an essential resource for researchers delving into the intricacies of MoE. We first briefly introduce the structure of the MoE layer, followed by proposing a new taxonomy of MoE. Next, we overview the core designs for various MoE models including both algorithmic and systemic aspects, alongside collections of available open-source implementations, hyperparameter configurations and empirical evaluations. Furthermore, we delineate the multifaceted applications of MoE in practice, and outline some potential directions for future research. Weilin Cai, Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang 0041, Jing Tang 0004, Sunghun Kim 0001, Jiayi Huang 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 3 |