EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joseph A. Dana
dblp:89/1041
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
software validation |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Quantitative Aspects of Software Validation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
error categorization · 0.0cost analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 | Quantitative Aspects of Software ValidationabstractDiscusses the need for quantitative descriptions of software errors and methods for gathering such data. The software development cycle is reviewed, and the frequency of the errors that are detected during software development and independent validation are compared. Data obtained from validation efforts are presented, indicating the number of errors in ten categories and three severity levels; the inferences that can be drawn from these data are discussed. Data describing the effectiveness of validation tools and techniques as a function of time are presented and discussed. The software validation cost is contrasted with the software development cost. The applications of better quantitative software error data are summarized. Raymond J. Rubey, Joseph A. Dana, Peter W. Biché |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |