Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathaniel Korda

dblp:89/11468 · also Nathan Korda · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 86% Optimization for machine learning · 8% Learning theory · 6%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.322013
Thompson Sampling for 1-Dimensional Exponential Family Bandits · NIPS 2013
Optimistic Bayesian Sampling in Contextual-Bandit Problems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling
0.322013
Thompson Sampling for 1-Dimensional Exponential Family Bandits · NIPS 2013
Optimistic Bayesian Sampling in Contextual-Bandit Problems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › structured bandit
clustering of bandits
0.212016
Distributed Clustering of Linear Bandits in Peer to Peer Networks · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › multi-agent bandit
distributed bandits
0.212016
Distributed Clustering of Linear Bandits in Peer to Peer Networks · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.212016
Distributed Clustering of Linear Bandits in Peer to Peer Networks · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
linear function approximation
0.212015
On TD(0) with function approximation: Concentration bounds and a centered variant with exponential convergence · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.212015
Fast Gradient Descent for Drifting Least Squares Regression, with Application to Bandits · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
0.212015
On TD(0) with function approximation: Concentration bounds and a centered variant with exponential convergence · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function estimation
0.212015
On TD(0) with function approximation: Concentration bounds and a centered variant with exponential convergence · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
bandit theory
0.212013
Thompson Sampling for 1-Dimensional Exponential Family Bandits · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit
0.112012
Optimistic Bayesian Sampling in Contextual-Bandit Problems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
0.112015
Fast Gradient Descent for Drifting Least Squares Regression, with Application to Bandits · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
linear bandits
0.112015
Fast Gradient Descent for Drifting Least Squares Regression, with Application to Bandits · AAAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

concentration inequalities · 0.4regret analysis · 0.2confidence ball algorithms · 0.2stochastic gradient descent · 0.2stochastic approximation · 0.2adaptive regularization · 0.2kullback-leibler divergence · 0.2jeffreys prior · 0.2fisher information · 0.2optimistic bayesian sampling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Concentration bounds for temporal difference learning with linear function approximation: the case of batch data and uniform sampling
Prashanth L. A., Nathaniel Korda, Rémi Munos
Mach. Learn.2
2016 Distributed Clustering of Linear Bandits in Peer to Peer Networks
abstract
We provide two distributed confidence ball algorithms for solving linear bandit problems in peer to peer networks with limited communication capabilities. For the first, we assume that all the peers are solving the same linear bandit problem, and prove that our algorithm achieves the optimal asymptotic regret rate of any centralised algorithm that can instantly communicate information between the peers. For the second, we assume that there are clusters of peers solving the same bandit problem within each cluster, and we prove that our algorithm discovers these clusters, while achieving the optimal asymptotic regret rate within each one. Through experiments on several real-world datasets, we demonstrate the performance of proposed algorithms compared to the state-of-the-art.
Nathaniel Korda, Balázs Szörényi
ICML1
2015 Fast Gradient Descent for Drifting Least Squares Regression, with Application to Bandits
abstract
Online learning algorithms require to often recompute least squares regression estimates of parameters. We study improving the computational complexity of such algorithms by using stochastic gradient descent (SGD) type schemes in place of classic regression solvers. We show that SGD schemes efficiently track the true solutions of the regression problems, even in the presence of a drift. This finding coupled with an $O(d)$ improvement in complexity, where $d$ is the dimension of the data, make them attractive for implementation in the \textit{big data} settings. In the case when strong convexity in the regression problem is guaranteed, we provide bounds on the error both in expectation and high probability (the latter is often needed to provide theoretical guarantees for higher level algorithms), despite the drifting least squares solution. As an example of this case we prove that the regret performance of an SGD version of the PEGE linear bandit algorithm is worse than that of PEGE itself only by a factor of $O(\log^4 n)$. When strong convexity of the regression problem cannot be guaranteed, we investigate using an adaptive regularisation. We make an empirical study of an adaptively regularised, SGD version of LinUCB in a news article recommendation application, which uses the large scale news recommendation dataset from Yahoo! front page. These experiments show a large gain in computational complexity and a consistently low tracking error.
Nathaniel Korda, Prashanth L. A., Rémi Munos
AAAI1
2015 On TD(0) with function approximation: Concentration bounds and a centered variant with exponential convergence
abstract
We provide non-asymptotic bounds for the well-known temporal difference learning algorithm TD(0) with linear function approximators. These include high-probability bounds as well as bounds in expectation. Our analysis suggests that a step-size inversely proportional to the number of iterations cannot guarantee optimal rate of convergence unless we assume (partial) knowledge of the stationary distribution for the Markov chain underlying the policy considered. We also provide bounds for the iterate averaged TD(0) variant, which gets rid of the step-size dependency while exhibiting the optimal rate of convergence. Furthermore, we propose a variant of TD(0) with linear approximators that incorporates a centering sequence, and establish that it exhibits an exponential rate of convergence in expectation. We demonstrate the usefulness of our bounds on two synthetic experimental settings.
Nathaniel Korda, Prashanth L. A.
ICML1
2014 Fast LSTD Using Stochastic Approximation: Finite Time Analysis and Application to Traffic Control
Prashanth L. A., Nathaniel Korda, Rémi Munos
ECML/PKDD (2)2
2013 Thompson Sampling for 1-Dimensional Exponential Family Bandits
abstract
Thompson Sampling has been demonstrated in many complex bandit models, however the theoretical guarantees available for the parametric multi-armed bandit are still limited to the Bernoulli case. Here we extend them by proving asymptotic optimality of the algorithm using the Jeffreys prior for $1$-dimensional exponential family bandits. Our proof builds on previous work, but also makes extensive use of closed forms for Kullback-Leibler divergence and Fisher information (and thus Jeffreys prior) available in an exponential family. This allow us to give a finite time exponential concentration inequality for posterior distributions on exponential families that may be of interest in its own right. Moreover our analysis covers some distributions for which no optimistic algorithm has yet been proposed, including heavy-tailed exponential families.
Nathaniel Korda, Emilie Kaufmann, Rémi Munos
NIPS1
2013 Finite-Time Analysis of Kernelised Contextual Bandits
Michal Valko, Nathaniel Korda, Rémi Munos, Ilias N. Flaounas, Nello Cristianini
UAI2
2012 Thompson Sampling: An Asymptotically Optimal Finite-Time Analysis
Emilie Kaufmann, Nathaniel Korda, Rémi Munos
ALT2
2012 Optimistic Bayesian Sampling in Contextual-Bandit Problems
Benedict C. May, Nathaniel Korda, Anthony Lee, David S. Leslie
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2