Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mitchell P. Marcus

dblp:89/2801 · also Mitch Marcus, Mitchell Marcus · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
32ranked-venue papers
8as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 26 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 5 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 65% Language models and text generation · 23% Machine translation · 12%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Automata and formal languages · 74% Algorithms and data structures · 24% Information theory · 1%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis
0.412020
Modeling Morphological Typology for Unsupervised Learning of Language Morphology · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.222012
Exploring Deterministic Constraints: from a Constrained English POS Tagger to an Efficient ILP Solution to Chinese Word Segmentation · ACL (1) 2012
A Simple Unsupervised Learner for POS Disambiguation Rules Given Only a Minimal Lexicon · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
multi-document summarization
0.212015
System Combination for Multi-document Summarization · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
system combination
0.212015
System Combination for Multi-document Summarization · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.212015
System Combination for Multi-document Summarization · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.232012
Dynamic Programming for Higher Order Parsing of Gap-Minding Trees · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Parsing a Natural Language Using Mutual Information Statistics · AAAI 1990
Towards Minimal Data Structures for Deterministic Parsing · IJCAI 1979
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word segmentation
chinese word segmentation
0.112012
Exploring Deterministic Constraints: from a Constrained English POS Tagger to an Efficient ILP Solution to Chinese Word Segmentation · ACL (1) 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word segmentation
0.112012
Exploring Deterministic Constraints: from a Constrained English POS Tagger to an Efficient ILP Solution to Chinese Word Segmentation · ACL (1) 2012
Human-robot interaction › robot communication
natural language instruction
0.112012
Situation understanding bot through language and environment · HRI 2012
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.112012
Dynamic Programming for Higher Order Parsing of Gap-Minding Trees · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphosyntactic analysis
0.112007
Determining Case in Arabic: Learning Complex Linguistic Behavior Requires Complex Linguistic Features · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Human-robot interaction
autonomous robot
0.012012
Situation understanding bot through language and environment · HRI 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
statistical parsing
0.011990
Parsing a Natural Language Using Mutual Information Statistics · AAAI 1990
Information theory › information measures
mutual information
0.011990
Parsing a Natural Language Using Mutual Information Statistics · AAAI 1990
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics
0.011989
Automatic Acquisition of the Lexical Semantics of Verbs from Sentence Frames · ACL 1989
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
predicate-argument structure
0.011989
Automatic Acquisition of the Lexical Semantics of Verbs from Sentence Frames · ACL 1989
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
deterministic parsing
0.011979
Towards Minimal Data Structures for Deterministic Parsing · IJCAI 1979
Automata and formal languages
parsing
0.011979
Towards Minimal Data Structures for Deterministic Parsing · IJCAI 1979
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design
0.041969
S-R-T Flip-Flop · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969
Cascaded Binary Counters with Feedback · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1963
Relay Essential Hazards · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1963
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design › sequential circuit design
flip-flop
0.011969
S-R-T Flip-Flop · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.041969
Cascaded Binary Counters with Feedback · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1963
S-R-T Flip-Flop · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969
Minimization of the Partially-Developed Transfer Tree · IRE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1957
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
sequential circuit design
0.011969
S-R-T Flip-Flop · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969
Electronic design automation › physical design
multiterminal nets
0.011957
Minimization of the Partially-Developed Transfer Tree · IRE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1957
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design › switching circuits
relay circuit
0.011963
Relay Essential Hazards · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1963

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constrained stem change rules · 0.9dynamic programming · 0.3supervised models · 0.2feature engineering · 0.2semantic analysis · 0.1integer linear programming · 0.1constrained tagging · 0.1unsupervised learning · 0.1mutual information statistics · 0.0structured overcommitment · 0.0tree rearrangement · 0.0tables of combinations · 0.0state analysis · 0.0operating characteristic analysis · 0.0hazard analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Annotating Chinese Word Senses with English WordNet: A Practice on OntoNotes Chinese Sense Inventories
abstract
In this paper, we present our exploration of annotating Chinese word senses using English WordNet synsets, with examples extracted from OntoNotes Chinese sense inventories. Given a target word along with the example that contains it, the annotators select a WordNet synset that best describes the meaning of the target word in the context. The result demonstrates an inter-annotator agreement of 38% between two annotators. We delve into the instances of disagreement by comparing the two annotated synsets, including their positions within the WordNet hierarchy. The examination reveals intriguing patterns among closely related synsets, shedding light on similar concepts represented within the WordNet structure. The data offers as an indirect linking of Chinese word senses defined in OntoNotes Chinese sense inventories to WordNet sysnets, and thus promotes the value of the OntoNotes corpus. Compared to a direct linking of Chinese word senses to WordNet synsets, the example-based annotation has the merit of not being affected by inaccurate sense definitions and thus offers a new way of mapping WordNets of different languages. At the same time, the annotated data also serves as a valuable linguistic resource for exploring potential lexical differences between English and Chinese, with potential contributions to the broader understanding of cross-linguistic semantic mapping
Hongzhi Xu, Jingxia Lin, Sameer Pradhan, Mitchell P. Marcus
LREC/COLING4
2021 A Grounded Approach to Modeling Generic Knowledge Acquisition
Deniz Beser, Joe Cecil 0002, Marjorie Freedman, Jacob A. Lichtefeld, Mitchell P. Marcus, Sarah R. B. Payne, Charles Yang 0001
CogSci5
2021 Grounding Word Learning Across Situations
Ryan Gabbard, Jacob A. Lichtefeld, Deniz Beser, Joe Cecil 0002, Mitchell P. Marcus, Sarah R. B. Payne, Charles Yang 0001, Marjorie Freedman
CogSci5
2020 Modeling Morphological Typology for Unsupervised Learning of Language Morphology
abstract
This paper describes a language-independent model for fully unsupervised morphological analysis that exploits a universal framework leveraging morphological typology.By modeling morphological processes including suffixation, prefixation, infixation, and full and partial reduplication with constrained stem change rules, our system effectively constrains the search space and offers a wide coverage in terms of morphological typology.The system is tested on nine typologically and genetically diverse languages, and shows superior performance over leading systems.We also investigate the effect of an oracle that provides only a handful of bits per language to signal morphological type.
Hongzhi Xu, Jordan Kodner, Mitchell P. Marcus, Charles Yang 0001
ACL3
2020 Morphological Segmentation for Low Resource Languages
abstract
This paper describes a new morphology resource created by Linguistic Data Consortium and the University of Pennsylvania for the DARPA LORELEI Program. The data consists of approximately 2000 tokens annotated for morphological segmentation in each of 9 low resource languages, along with root information for 7 of the languages. The languages annotated show a broad diversity of typological features. A minimal annotation scheme for segmentation was developed such that it could capture the patterns of a wide range of languages and also be performed reliably by non-linguist annotators. The basic annotation guidelines were designed to be language-independent, but included language-specific morphological paradigms and other specifications. The resulting annotated corpus is designed to support and stimulate the development of unsupervised morphological segmenters and analyzers by providing a gold standard for their evaluation on a more typologically diverse set of languages than has previously been available. By providing root annotation, this corpus is also a step toward supporting research in identifying richer morphological structures than simple morpheme boundaries.
Justin Mott, Ann Bies, Stephanie M. Strassel, Jordan Kodner, Caitlin Richter, Hongzhi Xu, Mitchell P. Marcus
LREC7
2018 Unsupervised Morphology Learning with Statistical Paradigms
abstract
This paper describes an unsupervised model for morphological segmentation that exploits the notion of paradigms, which are sets of morphological categories (e.g., suffixes) that can be applied to a homogeneous set of words (e.g., nouns or verbs). Our algorithm identifies statistically reliable paradigms from the morphological segmentation result of a probabilistic model, and chooses reliable suffixes from them. The new suffixes can be fed back iteratively to improve the accuracy of the probabilistic model. Finally, the unreliable paradigms are subjected to pruning to eliminate unreliable morphological relations between words. The paradigm-based algorithm significantly improves segmentation accuracy. Our method achieves start-of-the-art results on experiments using the Morpho-Challenge data, including English, Turkish, and Finnish.
Hongzhi Xu, Mitchell P. Marcus, Charles Yang 0001, Lyle H. Ungar
COLING2
2018 Low-resource Post Processing of Noisy OCR Output for Historical Corpus Digitisation
Caitlin Richter, Matthew Wickes, Deniz Beser, Mitchell P. Marcus
LREC4
2015 System Combination for Multi-document Summarization
abstract
We present a novel framework of system combination for multi-document summarization.For each input set (input), we generate candidate summaries by combining whole sentences from the summaries generated by different systems.We show that the oracle among these candidates is much better than the summaries that we have combined.We then present a supervised model to select among the candidates.The model relies on a rich set of features that capture content importance from different perspectives.Our model performs better than the systems that we combined based on manual and automatic evaluations.We also achieve very competitive performance on six DUC/TAC datasets, comparable to the state-of-the-art on most datasets.
Kai Hong, Mitchell P. Marcus, Ani Nenkova
EMNLP2
2013 Finding Optimal 1-Endpoint-Crossing Trees
abstract
Dependency parsing algorithms capable of producing the types of crossing dependencies seen in natural language sentences have traditionally been orders of magnitude slower than algorithms for projective trees. For 95.8–99.8% of dependency parses in various natural language treebanks, whenever an edge is crossed, the edges that cross it all have a common vertex. The optimal dependency tree that satisfies this 1-Endpoint-Crossing property can be found with an O( n4) parsing algorithm that recursively combines forests over intervals with one exterior point. 1-Endpoint-Crossing trees also have natural connections to linguistics and another class of graphs that has been studied in NLP.
Emily Pitler, Sampath Kannan, Mitchell P. Marcus
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics3
2012 Exploring Deterministic Constraints: from a Constrained English POS Tagger to an Efficient ILP Solution to Chinese Word Segmentation
Qiuye Zhao, Mitchell P. Marcus
ACL (1)2
2012 Long-Tail Distributions and Unsupervised Learning of Morphology
Qiuye Zhao, Mitchell P. Marcus
COLING2
2012 Dynamic Programming for Higher Order Parsing of Gap-Minding Trees
Emily Pitler, Sampath Kannan, Mitchell P. Marcus
EMNLP-CoNLL3
2012 Situation understanding bot through language and environment
abstract
This video shows a demonstration of a fully autonomous robot, an iRobot ATRV-JR, which can be given commands using natural language. Users type commands to the robot on a tablet computer, which are then parsed and processed using semantic analysis. This information is used to build a plan representing the high level autonomous behaviors the robot should perform [2][1]. The robot can be given commands to be executed immediately (e.g., "Search the floor for hostages.") as well as standing orders for use over the entire run (e.g., "Let me know if you see any bombs.").
Daniel J. Brooks, Constantine Lignos, Mikhail S. Medvedev, Ian Perera, Cameron Finucane, Vasumathi Raman, Abraham Shultz, Sean McSheehy, Adam Norton, Hadas Kress-Gazit, Mitchell P. Marcus, Holly A. Yanco
HRI11
2011 Functional Elements and POS Categories
Qiuye Zhao, Mitchell P. Marcus
IJCNLP2
2009 A Simple Unsupervised Learner for POS Disambiguation Rules Given Only a Minimal Lexicon
Qiuye Zhao, Mitchell P. Marcus
EMNLP2
2009 Human Aided Computer Assessment for Exhaustive Search
abstract
Human-computer interaction has been proposed as a means for more effectively dealing with the challenges posed by information retrieval. However, within the hierarchy of information needs, certain kinds of needs are only poorly handled by existing techniques. Information needs requiring thoroughness (exhaustive research, information discovery) are not well served by existing models of human-computer information retrieval (HCIR). Information needs such as these are commonplace in legal, patent, medical and intelligence searches. In such applications, high recall with high precision is the primary consideration, and the standard model, which treats human interaction as a kind of post-processing filter, does not yield a system with desired characteristics. In this paper, we propose an alternative model of HCIR which yields systems whose properties are more closely aligned with the needs of the exhaustive research task, and describe an implementation of such a system, demonstrating its effectiveness over the standard model in a task that models real-world conditions.
Christopher Hogan, Dan Brassil, Mitchell P. Marcus
SMC3
2007 Determining Case in Arabic: Learning Complex Linguistic Behavior Requires Complex Linguistic Features
Nizar Habash, Ryan Gabbard, Owen Rambow, Seth Kulick, Mitchell P. Marcus
EMNLP-CoNLL5
2006 Fully Parsing the Penn Treebank
Ryan Gabbard, Seth Kulick, Mitchell P. Marcus
HLT-NAACL3
2006 OntoNotes: The 90% Solution
Eduard H. Hovy, Mitchell P. Marcus, Martha Palmer, Lance A. Ramshaw, Ralph M. Weischedel
HLT-NAACL2
2000 Developing Guidelines and Ensuring Consistency for Chinese Text Annotation
Fei Xia 0004, Martha Palmer, Nianwen Xue, Mary Ellen Okurowski, John Kovarik, Fu-Dong Chiou, Shizhe Huang, Tony Kroch, Mitchell P. Marcus
LREC9
1993 Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz
Comput. Linguistics1
1991 Pearl: A Probabilistic Chart Parser
David M. Magerman, Mitchell P. Marcus
EACL2
1990 Parsing a Natural Language Using Mutual Information Statistics
David M. Magerman, Mitchell P. Marcus
AAAI2
1989 Automatic Acquisition of the Lexical Semantics of Verbs from Sentence Frames
abstract
This paper presents a computational model of verb acquisition which uses what we will call the principle of structured overcommitment to eliminate the need for negative evidence. The learner escapes from the need to be told that certain possibilities cannot occur (i.e., are "ungrammatical") by one simple expedient: It assumes that all properties it has observed are either obligatory or forbidden until it sees otherwise, at which point it decides that what it thought was either obligatory or forbidden is merely optional. This model is built upon a classification of verbs based upon a simple three-valued set of features which represents key aspects of a verb's syntactic structure, its predicate/argument structure, and the mapping between them.
Mort Webster, Mitchell P. Marcus
ACL2
1983 D-Theory: Talking about Talking about Trees
abstract
Linguists, including computational linguists, have always been fond of talking about trees. In this paper, we outline a theory of linguistic structure which talks about talking about trees; we call this theory Description theory (D-theory). While important issues must be resolved before a complete picture of D-theory emerges (and also before we can build programs which utilize it), we believe that this theory will ultimately provide a framework for explaining the syntax and semantics of natural language in a manner which is intrinsically computational. This paper will focus primarily on one set of motivations for this theory, those engendered by attempts to handle certain syntactic phenomena within the framework of deterministic parsing.
Mitchell P. Marcus, Donald Hindle, Margaret M. Fleck
ACL1
1982 Building Non-Normative Systems - the Search for Robustness an Overview
abstract
No abstract available.
Mitchell P. Marcus
ACL1
1979 Towards Minimal Data Structures for Deterministic Parsing
David W. Shipman, Mitchell P. Marcus
IJCAI2
1969 S-R-T Flip-Flop
abstract
Two different definitions for the operating characteristics of the S-R-T flip-flop exist in the literature. These two definitions are discussed, and it is argued that one definition is unnecessarily restrictive while the second is not only more logically correct but leads to more economical circuitry.
Mitchell P. Marcus
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1963 Cascaded Binary Counters with Feedback
abstract
A simple general method for analyzing any given cascaded binary counter feedback configuration is presented. The count can be determined directly from the diagram without the need of writing equations of any form. The synthesis of cascaded binary counter feedback configurations is also discussed, and a table of feedback configurations with the minimum number of feedback connections is presented.
Mitchell P. Marcus
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput.1
1963 Relay Essential Hazards
Mitchell P. Marcus
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput.1
1957 Minimization of the Partially-Developed Transfer Tree
abstract
A transfer tree is a particular type of multiterminal network having a single input which may be connected to any one of a number of outputs. An n-relay transfer tree is partially developed if it has less than the 2n possible output terminals. Rearrangement of a partially-developed tree can lead to a reduction in the total number of transfers required. This paper presents a method of obtaining a required partially-developed transfer tree with the minimum number of transfers.
Mitchell P. Marcus
IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.1
1956 The Detection and Identification of Symmetric Switching Functions with the Use of Tables of Combinations
Mitchell P. Marcus
IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.1