EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nitin Indurkhya
dblp:89/3263
· DBLP profile ↗
21ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 6 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Data mining · 91% Information retrieval · 9% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 52% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 40% Learning theory · 8% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.1 | 3 | 2001 | Solving regression problems with rule-based ensemble classifiers · KDD 2001 Lightweight Rule Induction · ICML 2000 Small Sample Decision tree Pruning · ICML 1994 |
Data mining › text mining
text classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Experiments in high-dimensional text categorization · SIGIR 2002 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Solving regression problems with rule-based ensemble classifiers · KDD 2001 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
regression |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Solving regression problems with rule-based ensemble classifiers · KDD 2001 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
rule induction |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Lightweight Rule Induction · ICML 2000 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Decision Tree Pruning: Biased or Optimal? · AAAI 1994 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree learning
decision tree pruning |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Decision Tree Pruning: Biased or Optimal? · AAAI 1994 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
decision tree learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Small Sample Decision tree Pruning · ICML 1994 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › decision tree learning
decision tree pruning |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Small Sample Decision tree Pruning · ICML 1994 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Experiments in high-dimensional text categorization · SIGIR 2002 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Experiments in high-dimensional text categorization · SIGIR 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Transmembrane Segment Prediction from Protein Sequence Data · ISMB 1993 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › membrane protein structure prediction › transmembrane topology prediction
transmembrane helix prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Transmembrane Segment Prediction from Protein Sequence Data · ISMB 1993 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
rule learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Reduced Complexity Rule Induction · IJCAI 1991 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
bias-variance tradeoff |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Decision Tree Pruning: Biased or Optimal? · AAAI 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse feature representation · 0.0linear classifier · 0.0decision tree · 0.0k-means clustering · 0.0decision-rule ensembles · 0.0rule induction · 0.0pruning · 0.0decision tree pruning · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Condition-transforming Variational Autoencoder for Conversation Response GenerationabstractThis paper proposes a new model, called condition-transforming variational autoencoder (CTVAE), to improve the performance of conversation response generation using conditional variational autoencoders (CVAEs). In conventional CVAEs , the prior distribution of latent variable z follows a multivariate Gaussian distribution with mean and variance modulated by the input conditions. Previous work found that this distribution tends to become condition-independent in practical application. In our proposed CTVAE model, the latent variable z is sampled by performing a non-linear transformation on the combination of the input conditions and the samples from a condition-independent prior distribution N(0,I). In our objective evaluations, the CTVAE model outperforms the CVAE model on fluency metrics and surpasses a sequence-to-sequence (Seq2Seq) model on diversity metrics. In subjective preference tests, our proposed CTVAE model performs significantly better than CVAE and Seq2Seq models on generating fluency, informative and topic relevant responses. Yu-Ping Ruan, Zhen-Hua Ling, Quan Liu 0003, Zhigang Chen 0003, Nitin Indurkhya |
ICASSP | 5 |
| 2008 | Estimating Sales Opportunity Using Similarity-Based Methods
Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 2 |
| 2004 | Text categorization for a comprehensive time-dependent benchmark
Fred J. Damerau, Tong Zhang 0001, Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 4 |
| 2002 | Experiments in high-dimensional text categorizationabstractWe present results for automated text categorization of the Reuters-810000 collection of news stories. Our experiments use the entire one-year collection of 810,000 stories and the entire subject index. We divide the data into monthly groups and provide an initial benchmark of text categorization performance on the complete collection. Experimental results show that efficient sparse-feature implementations of linear methods and decision trees, using a global unstemmed dictionary, can readily handle applications of this size. Predictive performance is approximately as strong as the best results for the much smaller older Reuters collections. Detailed results are provided over time periods. It is shown that a smaller time horizon does not diminish predictive quality, implying reduced demands for retraining when sample size is large. Fred J. Damerau, Tong Zhang 0001, Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
SIGIR | 4 |
| 2001 | Solving regression problems with rule-based ensemble classifiersabstractWe describe a lightweight learning method that induces an ensemble of decision-rule solutions for regression problems. Instead of direct prediction of a continuous output variable, the method discretizes the variable by k-means clustering and solves the resultant classification problem. Predictions on new examples are made by averaging the mean values of classes with votes that are close in number to the most likely class. We provide experimental evidence that this indirect approach can often yield strong results for many applications, generally outperforming direct approaches such as regression trees and rivaling bagged regression trees. Nitin Indurkhya, Sholom M. Weiss |
KDD | 1 |
| 2001 | Lightweight Collaborative Filtering Method for Binary-Encoded Data
Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
PKDD | 2 |
| 2000 | Lightweight Rule Induction
Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
ICML | 2 |
| 1998 | Estimating Performance Gains for Voted Decision TreesabstractDecision tree induction is a prominent learning method, typically yielding quick results with competitive predictive performance. However, it is not unusual to find other automated learning methods that exceed the predictive performance of a decision tree on the same application. To achieve near-optimal classification results, resampling techniques can be employed to generate multiple decision-tree solutions. These decision trees are individually applied and their answers voted. The potential for exceptionally strong performance is counterbalanced by the substantial increase in computing time to induce many decision trees. We describe estimators of predictive performance for voted decision trees induced from bootstrap (bagged) or adaptive (boosted) resampling. The estimates are found by examining the performance of a single tree and its pruned subtrees over a single, training set and a large test set. Using publicly available collections of data, we show that these estimates are usually quite accurate, with occasional weaker estimates. The great advantage of these estimates is that they reveal the predictive potential of voted decision trees prior to applying expensive computational procedures. Nitin Indurkhya, Sholom M. Weiss |
Intell. Data Anal. | 1 |
| 1996 | Selecting the Right-Size Model for Prediction
Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
Appl. Intell. | 2 |
| 1995 | Using Case Data to Improve on Rule-based Function Approximation
Nitin Indurkhya, Sholom M. Weiss |
ICCBR | 1 |
| 1995 | Rule-based Machine Learning Methods for Functional PredictionabstractWe describe a machine learning method for predicting the value of a real-valued function, given the values of multiple input variables. The method induces solutions from samples in the form of ordered disjunctive normal form (DNF) decision rules. A central objective of the method and representation is the induction of compact, easily interpretable solutions. This rule-based decision model can be extended to search efficiently for similar cases prior to approximating function values. Experimental results on real-world data demonstrate that the new techniques are competitive with existing machine learning and statistical methods and can sometimes yield superior regression performance. Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 2 |
| 1994 | Decision Tree Pruning: Biased or Optimal?
Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
AAAI | 2 |
| 1994 | Small Sample Decision tree Pruning
Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
ICML | 2 |
| 1994 | Guest editors' introduction
Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
Appl. Intell. | 2 |
| 1994 | Graph-based induction as a unified learning framework
Hiroshi Motoda, Nitin Indurkhya |
Appl. Intell. | 3 |
| 1993 | Rule-Based Regression
Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 1993 | Transmembrane Segment Prediction from Protein Sequence Data
Sholom M. Weiss, Dawn M. Cohen, Nitin Indurkhya |
ISMB | 3 |
| 1992 | Heuristic configuration of single hidden-layer feed-forward neural networks
Nitin Indurkhya, Sholom M. Weiss |
Appl. Intell. | 1 |
| 1991 | Reduced Complexity Rule Induction
Sholom M. Weiss, Nitin Indurkhya |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 1991 | Iterative rule induction methods
Nitin Indurkhya, Sholom M. Weiss |
Appl. Intell. | 1 |
| 1989 | Models for measuring performance of medical expert systems
Nitin Indurkhya, Sholom M. Weiss |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 1 |