Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph M. Milner

dblp:89/366 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 70% Computational geometry · 23% Algorithms and data structures · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational geometry › motion planning › assembly planning
assembly sequence planning
0.011994
Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.011994
Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994
Mathematical optimization
metaheuristic optimization
0.011994
Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994
Mathematical optimization › metaheuristic optimization
simulated annealing
0.011994
Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.011994
Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated annealing · 0.0genetic algorithm · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences
abstract
Applies simulated annealing (SA) to find the probable least cost assembly sequence for a mechanical product from among the thousands of feasible sequences. The sequences are represented by the assembly sequence network introduced by De Fazio and Whitney (1987). Candidate sequences are selected one at a time by the SA algorithm and their cost is estimated by designing a minimum unit cost concept assembly system using a dynamic programming algorithm. Alternate sequences are selected by perturbing the path through the sequence network in a way similar to a genetic algorithm. This method differs from that normally used to select least cost sequences, in which an engineer edits the thousands of sequences using judgment and experience, and then obtains the costs of a few that survive editing. Here, the search for a least cost sequence is done without prior editing. In the examples studied, there appear to be a large number of sequences that are technically quite different but of similar cost.>
Joseph M. Milner, Stephen C. Graves, Daniel E. Whitney
ICRA1