Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joseph M. Milner
dblp:89/366
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 70% Computational geometry · 23% Algorithms and data structures · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational geometry › motion planning › assembly planning
assembly sequence planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994 |
Mathematical optimization
metaheuristic optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994 |
Mathematical optimization › metaheuristic optimization
simulated annealing |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994 |
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly Sequences · ICRA 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulated annealing · 0.0genetic algorithm · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Using Simulated Annealing to Select Least-Cost Assembly SequencesabstractApplies simulated annealing (SA) to find the probable least cost assembly sequence for a mechanical product from among the thousands of feasible sequences. The sequences are represented by the assembly sequence network introduced by De Fazio and Whitney (1987). Candidate sequences are selected one at a time by the SA algorithm and their cost is estimated by designing a minimum unit cost concept assembly system using a dynamic programming algorithm. Alternate sequences are selected by perturbing the path through the sequence network in a way similar to a genetic algorithm. This method differs from that normally used to select least cost sequences, in which an engineer edits the thousands of sequences using judgment and experience, and then obtains the costs of a few that survive editing. Here, the search for a least cost sequence is done without prior editing. In the examples studied, there appear to be a large number of sequences that are technically quite different but of similar cost.> Joseph M. Milner, Stephen C. Graves, Daniel E. Whitney |
ICRA | 1 |