Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rita Casadonte
dblp:89/3745
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-9054-4786ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
mass spectrometry imaging |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
convolutional neural network classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sensitivity analysis · 0.7cross-validation · 0.7deep convolutional networks · 0.3deep convolutional network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometryabstractMotivation: Tumor classification using imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) data has a high potential for future applications in pathology. Due to the complexity and size of the data, automated feature extraction and classification steps are required to fully process the data. Since mass spectra exhibit certain structural similarities to image data, deep learning may offer a promising strategy for classification of IMS data as it has been successfully applied to image classification. Results: Methodologically, we propose an adapted architecture based on deep convolutional networks to handle the characteristics of mass spectrometry data, as well as a strategy to interpret the learned model in the spectral domain based on a sensitivity analysis. The proposed methods are evaluated on two algorithmically challenging tumor classification tasks and compared to a baseline approach. Competitiveness of the proposed methods is shown on both tasks by studying the performance via cross-validation. Moreover, the learned models are analyzed by the proposed sensitivity analysis revealing biologically plausible effects as well as confounding factors of the considered tasks. Thus, this study may serve as a starting point for further development of deep learning approaches in IMS classification tasks. Availability and implementation: https://gitlab.informatik.uni-bremen.de/digipath/Deep_Learning_for_Tumor_Classification_in_IMS. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jens Behrmann, Christian Etmann, Tobias Boskamp, Rita Casadonte, Jörg Kriegsmann, Peter Maass |
Bioinform. | 4 |