EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
L. Douglas Baker
dblp:89/454
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 91% 3D vision · 9% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation › trajectory estimation
continuous-time trajectory estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar · ICRA 2014 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM › 3D SLAM
LiDAR SLAM |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar · ICRA 2014 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar · ICRA 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud registration |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar · ICRA 2014 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Distributional Clustering of Words for Text Classification · SIGIR 1998 |
Data mining › clustering › probabilistic clustering
distribution clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Distributional Clustering of Words for Text Classification · SIGIR 1998 |
Data mining › text mining
text classification |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Distributional Clustering of Words for Text Classification · SIGIR 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterative closest point · 0.2basis function representation · 0.2mutual information feature selection · 0.0latent semantic indexing · 0.0distributional clustering · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidarabstractWe extend the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm to obtain a method for continuous-time trajectory estimation (CICP) suitable for SLAM from actuated lidar. Traditional solutions to SLAM from actuated lidar rely heavily on the accuracy of an auxiliary pose sensor to form rigid frames. These frames are then used with ICP to obtain accurate pose estimates. However, since lidar records a single range sample at time, any error in inter-sample sensor motion must be accounted for. This is not possible if the frame is treated as a rigid point cloud. In this work, instead of ICP we estimate a continuous-time trajectory that takes into account inter-sample pose errors. The trajectory is represented as a linear combination of basis functions and formulated as a solution to a (sparse) linear system without restrictive assumptions on sensor motion. We evaluate the algorithm on synthetic and real data and show improved accuracy in open-loop SLAM in comparison to state-of-the-art rigid registration methods. Hatem Alismail, L. Douglas Baker, Brett Browning |
ICRA | 2 |
| 1998 | Distributional Clustering of Words for Text ClassificationabstractThis paper describes the application of Distributional Clustering [20] to document classification. This approach clusters words into groups based on the distribution of class labels associated with each word. Thus, unlike some other unsupervised dimensionalityreduction techniques, such as Latent Semantic Indexing, we are able to compress the feature space much more aggressively, while still maintaining high document classification accuracy. Experimental results obtained on three real-world data sets show that we can reduce the feature dimensionality by three orders of magnitude and lose only 2% accuracy---significantly better than Latent Semantic Indexing [6], class-based clustering [1], feature selection by mutual information [23], or Markov-blanket-based feature selection [13]. We also show that less aggressive clustering sometimes results in improved classification accuracy over classification without clustering. 1 Introduction The popularity of the Internet has caused an exponent... L. Douglas Baker, Andrew McCallum |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 1992 | Using Gateways To Build A Route Map
David Kortenkamp, L. Douglas Baker, Terry E. Weymouth |
IROS | 2 |